Sponsored by HowLifeWorks
How Private Online Shopping Clubs Work view!
howlifeworks.com - How to become a member and get discounts of up to 80% on must-have luxury goods
5 Comments
- DigiDave, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6I was wondering what blog was going to point this out first.
I wasn't going to complain too much when Digg removed the top digger list. But this seems like it's going to far. I have no context for my OWN profile now. Am I a good social bookmarker? I don't know -- I have no way to compare myself to anyone. It's one thing to try and fight spam and gamming. But this takes away something completetly different from the Digg interface. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Digg simply will never be the same. Social bookmarking without the social, Sad
- UglieJosh, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I'm glad they are implementing these changes. The old way made it almost impossible for someone like me (relatively new to Digg) to submit a story and have it become popular. I've submitted one story and probably won't bother with any more because I know, even if it's a great story, it won't get Dugg. Later on, however, a more popular Digger will submit the same story and it will hit the front page in a matter of hours.
- HMTKSteve, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Unless they change the algorithm we are not yet on an equal footing.
- xtmno3, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3"Social bookmarking without the social, Sad"
I say social bookmarking without the hierarchical layout. Everyone on even playing field.
(And before you comment on "where is the motivation now?": the motivation is sharing good information...which should help limit the amount of garbage submissions)
What is Digg?