5 Comments
- Kylde, on 01/24/2008, -0/+9"many long time patrons of the site feel betrayed, and that things are being engineered so that they can no longer effectively use the site as they’ve grown accustomed" ... as a marketing tool maybe? That's not how I see Digg, or how it's TOS reads, I think it NEEDS change
- nonforma, on 01/24/2008, -0/+8Rebel forces? These blogs trying to stir up hype (and traffic) are getting more and more alarmist to try and top each other. A few more versions and I think we may have potential plot for another episode of 24.
- charlief, on 01/24/2008, -0/+6Everyone is uncomfortable with change.
Remember when the interface was redone?
Remember when the top diggers were removed?
Remember when the digg algorhythm changed the first time around?
Digg me down if you want..but seriously.. Digg is growing up by changing their code. Everyone else whos complaining needs to grow up now too. It's part of a growing company. - diggymow, on 01/24/2008, -0/+4Hey todays hot topic! Be alarmist about a change on digg to make some quick traffic! And once again friend you are buried.
- DraggingTheLake, on 01/24/2008, -0/+1OMG, you mean I can't use fake online friends to push me to the front page anymore?



What is Digg?