5 Comments
- Homez, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Yup I was there too, very interesting.
- Dracos, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Dreamweaver (and probably GoLive) is the reason why som many self-proclaimed "web designers" can't write simple, valid HTML (much less XHTML, which these programs have yet to fully comprehend), are inept at Javascipt, and still fail to understand CSS beyond colors and fonts.
@RyeBrye:
I'm all for killing Fireworks as long as they keep abusing PNG as a source storage format. Nothing else I've seen can read the layer data Fireworks inserts. PNG is an output format (like gif and jpg), not a source storage format (as in psd or tiff). - RyeBrye, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Now the question is: Fireworks or ImageReady? [I pull for Fireworks] Freehand or Illustrator? [Illustrator, obviously]
- patachon, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"I'm all for killing Fireworks as long as they keep abusing PNG as a source storage format."
I can't understand how they let people comment who know nothing about design -- particularly graphic design. Even two seconds on Fireworks would be enough to tell you that the default format of PNG on Fireworks is for storage much like PSD is for Photoshop. As almost anyone who's ever used Fireworks knows, you need to EXPORT your final image for the web. Complaining that you can't read these storage PNG files in other applications is like complaining that you can't do the same with PSD's.
Schees, how uninformed can you get.
Fireworks by the way is a fantastic product precisely because it makes working with both bitmaps and vector shapes a breeze -- contrary to Photoshop where working with vector shapes is nothing but a headache. - kodeiko, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Why don't they just abandon GoLive and go with Dreamweaver already?


What is Digg?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our