digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

5 Tips for Getting the Most Out of digg Traffic

erraticwisdom.com — Five simple steps for getting the Most Out of your front-page digg.

Who dugg this? Made popular Feb 5, 2006

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

34 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • jo42, on 10/12/2007, -0/+17) Replace images with goatse after first few thousand hits
  • ThankTheCheese, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Sure, but need I remind you that Digg is not here to advertise your website.

    Articles like this one will encourage people to do stupid things like link to their blog that links to the article they've submitted, rather than linking to the article directly.
  • michaelphipps, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I disagree - I don't believe this article is about fooling diggers to your site. It is about taking advantage of the traffic digg can potentially produce for you. I digg it.
  • illegal_op, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4good tips
    __________________
    http;//www.leve1.com
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4coool :) thanks some good tips


    --
    http://www.diggfans.com - digg deeper
  • mycotics, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0nice article
  • rusty_g, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1i like it...
  • MondoMan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Good tips, but mostly common sense stuff. +dugg
  • superbnerd, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1extremely ironic but very good non-the-less.
  • Mongoose, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Digg effect.
  • stenspect, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0mention of adding a feed button or subscribe button are so obvious, yet we didnt have when we got dugg a bunch of times - boo on us.
  • crea, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Very cool +digg
  • davdav, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1@perral


    People get modded down because of their sigs. I mark them as spam myself.
  • sagaciousblonde, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0I'd want to utilize these if any of my work/my was ever dugg, so +digg.
  • calhoun, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1ironic!
  • j0keR, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0This article, I digg it because it was interesting.

    Comments are for feedback. If somebody reads it and doesn't "digg it," it only makes sence to give a brief explanation as to why.
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0ironic lol
  • OmarG, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Haha, pretty funny :D
  • ctomasi, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Good info!

    I did a podcast interview with Kevin Rose about a month ago on this topic. If you would like to hear his take, check it out at: http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?page_id=129
  • paulrus, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Bah @ ctomasi - we did an entire Digg Nation podcast special & got a whopping 7 diggs.
    You'd think that at least I could get the phrase "cocktakey" on the front page.
  • abbtech, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1Good article, makes sense. I agree though... Kind of an ironic topic :)

    -------------------------------------
    http://hackedgadgets.com
  • perral1, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0WTH? Why did two perfectly good complements "coool :) thanks some good tips" and "good tips" get -3'd???

    I think the article is good, definetly worth a read for webadmins...
  • eschatonik, on 10/12/2007, -7/+4Ugg. A bunch of ***** about taking advantage of the potential of *USING* DIGG to drive traffic to your *****-ass-egocentric-blog. No surprise that the first comment is from "GeeksAreSexy" kiltak who has done nothing to support the DIGG community, but rather, has used the popularity of DIGG to drive traffic to his crap-ass-adsense-whoring piece of ***** piece of pseudo journalism by spamming his blog link in every single useless comment that he has made (which has simply just been for the purpose of propagating his link in the eyes of the search engine spiders).

    ***** you for digging this. The internet was supposed to be something better than this, You ***** are playing the numbers game to appeal to the lowest common denominator and nothing more. ***** you for not adding truly insightful information to the conversation. ***** you for developing media that is nothing more than an ad campaign towards the sheeple. ***** you with your "stickyness". ***** you. ***** you. ***** you with a whiffle ball bat.
  • chilifries, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Darn, I was hoping it would tell me how to make money off of all the traffic via ads/pr0n/scam/etc.
  • t928, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1Lame.
  • FelixdaaHack, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0new title: How to fool diggers to your site to drive up site stats
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0najs
  • GeneralChang, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0WoW Lame!

    Tip 7: Hide the fact you get a boner from getting page views.
  • ProAm500, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0lamed......:) j/k...still no digg.....
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0I digg. Although I'm not sure what is meant by it. Do they mean having an article on your blog or site that is lucky enough to get dugg?

    http://www.gfx.com
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0i really hate it when people say they dont digg, what a waste of my time to read about some little piss ass who wants to go against the majority

    i'm going to digg, out of spite for somefool91.
  • brashquido, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0I found it a very interesting read, so "***** you" eschatonik for not digging it...
  • SomeFool91, on 10/12/2007, -7/+1-Digg

    Worst article I have ever read on Digg.

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.