What is Digg?Sponsored by Travelzoo
Take Advantage of Ridiculously Low Holiday Airfares view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year. But move on it now.
27 Comments
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I wouldn't want to work for most of them.
Also, I see that L3 is on there. Funny story....
If you go to maps.google.com and do a search for "gay strip clubs near 500 eldorado blvd, 80021" (which is where the big Sun campus is a few blocks from the L3 campus), the VERY FIRST RESULT for "gay strip clubs" in that area will be Level 3!
Don't ask me how I found this out. - Kamatz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Morons read the Methodology on the right under the charts.
"To find the B2 100, we started with 2,000 publicly traded tech companies ..." - willin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Umm, math? Where exactly is the math? One of the companies has a listed growth of
0.5 (revenue) -10.6 (stock price). No math here. - MasterDwarf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Well one flaw is that they are all publically traded companies. Private companies could be growing faster, but then nobody would really know...until it's too late.
- algorythm, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Seumas (1),
Level 3 is not the same as L-3 Communications - willin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The methodology is interesting largely because of its vagueness Out of 2000 companies, they narrowed it down according to their criteria and then what? The 100th ranked company has a revenue growth of 92.8% and the stock price has lost -37.9%. The 91st ranked company has a revenue growth of 30.6 % and the stock price has lost -70.3%. In other words, according to the numbers published here company no. 100 should be ahead of company no. 91 by both measures.
- Arramol, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0#7 - Biosite. Isn't that the company that makes the Chimaera virus in Mission Impossible 2? Somebody call Tom Cruise.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Scary that 10% of them are military. Thanks GW!
- linuxrebel, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Sorry but this really isn't a very good "list". My reason is that they aren't taking into account privately held companies. For example a company I am interviewing with has experienced a 278% growth in traffic volume (they are an ISP) over the last year basically taking them from top 50 to top 10 nationally and they aren't listed. I know of server companies like this in the Valley here and not a single one of them is listed because they are all pre-IPO. IMHO this is a stat designed so that board (bored?) members can pat each other on the back and people playing the stock lotto will buy on Monday.
- mikeporter, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1old news...saw this list about two months ago
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Where's Google!?
- DigitAl56K, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Is this list PLC only?
- Kamatz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I'm just waiting for someone to bitch about what #1 is. Only a matter of time.
- MasterDwarf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Peace sells, but who's buying.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0They should also add Mercora
www.Mercora.com - grayBot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0o and peace would sell if we were smart.....
just think if 500 billion went into funding research for alternative energy sources, national high speed wi-fi and a computer literate society ( able to code ) .... our economy would be bursting and we could leave the silly petroleum wars to Brazil, Russia , India and China - grayBot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0ok ..... ok ...... google hasnt been traded "for the last three years " ..... but requiring the company to be public for at least 3 years make this a really bad list for high growth tech companies ??
I suspect there are many high growth tech companies that have gone public within the last 3 years..... No seagate or google.... boo - ceeze, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"...narrowed the list to companies that have been trading for at least three years, have a market capitalization of at least $50 million, and have positive cash flow over the most recently reported 12 months."
Leaves out a lot of the companies discussed here. - schroeder, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0would have bought bought apple stock if i had the money... no brainer... but where IS google? Maybe it was the recent drop...
- muzikandpics, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0wow alot of unkowns
- grayBot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Google grew at near 100% in both revenue and stock return... why arent they on the list ? .....
- Tetra, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0It's more revealing that many are "military electronics" companies. We know why they're growing fast.
http://bsalert.com/ - mbajax, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Interesting none of the Web2.0 companies are in the top 10. Maybe a year from now some of them will. It proves once again that by the time they make it to CNN, it's too late a news for making investment return.
#1 CRDN is a body armor maker for military, a sure bet 2 years ago. Find out more about them on http://www.stockdigg.com - sparkmonkeyz, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0this is gay, adn how the hell did McAffee get on the list. I think its the worst program out there. When i downloaded it to my computer, my other virus program found more viruses, because i think that they make them to make you think that they are finding ones your other programs didnt
- abbtech, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0Amazing how many are medical and electronic in nature...
-------------------------------------
http://hackedgadgets.com - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0I was expecting to see google on there.
http://aljitech.com/ Digg's Playground - handeyman, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0this list is bs
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is