What is Digg?93 Comments
- drmangrum, on 08/26/2008, -3/+60Buried for using a HORRIBLE format to display 100 items.
- Farmer77, on 08/26/2008, -1/+30What, no PirateBay? No YouPorn? This list is incomplete.
- chrissku, on 08/26/2008, -6/+32I disagree with Yahoo Mail being on this list. Gmail is much better at controlling spam than Yahoo.
Yahoo Mail sucks. - zecreven, on 08/25/2008, -5/+21some people are listing their fav sites doesn't mean that they are the top 100 classic web sites..
- mediaspree, on 08/26/2008, -0/+11They were all pretty much like this http://www.angelfire.com/super/badwebs/
- airj1012, on 08/26/2008, -3/+14But...2008 isn't over yet.
- inactive, on 08/26/2008, -4/+14I'm very pleased to find MakeUseOf in this list. Being a part of the team, it's certainly a great feeling !
- ritubpant, on 08/25/2008, -6/+13messed up the URL a little in submission but click next twice and u shud get there ;-) or click here to get directly http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328651,00.as ...
Ok, ok am not that smart.....you all cracked it ;-) njoy guys - fuckingusername, on 08/26/2008, -3/+9100 tops site on 1 of the worst sites!
- brock2020, on 08/26/2008, -2/+8I would like to see the 100 Best and Top Classic Website of the early 1990's instead
- username7410, on 08/26/2008, -0/+6PCmag certainly isn't on any best list for websites, their site is horrible!
*edit: I spoke too soon! They've actually included themselves! lol - dan222555, on 08/26/2008, -1/+6Huffington Post?
No thanks. - fhernand, on 08/26/2008, -0/+4yahoo mail? really?
- BrendanSheehan, on 08/26/2008, -0/+3No problem. The issue I have is them including CNN in that list.
- marcz, on 08/26/2008, -0/+3How did this get to front page? Dugg down.
- inactive, on 08/26/2008, -0/+3HamsterDance!
- Burrito, on 08/26/2008, -0/+3I completely agree with you. Gmail is leaps and bounds above Yahoo Mail, but My.Yahoo.com has been my homepage for years and it's fantastic. Firefox makes it easy to have the best of both worlds.
- mibi, on 08/26/2008, -5/+8They list their own site as well as a few of their sister sites too.
- inactive, on 08/26/2008, -0/+3How is that ironic?
- wickensworth, on 08/26/2008, -0/+3Here are a few: http://ekarj.com/internet96.
- venicerocco, on 08/26/2008, -3/+5Ironically it's all bundled up in the WORST looking and operating website ever. NEXT NEXT NEXT
Crap. - benstl, on 08/26/2008, -1/+3pcmag.com is definitely not on the list.
- Gravey9, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2some of the bests on one of the worsts
- LLamaStar, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2anyone else notice that this site is ***** horrible?
- Aksumka, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2If you're going to include a site that showcases Flash games, why would you not use Newgrounds? On the wiki for addicting games (the whole paragraph) it claims to be one of the first flash game sites. Ok, why not list the first?
I'm sorry, but Newgrounds is ten times better than addicting games. - Yooree, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2No joke. This is a dumb list. I don't understand how 'Indexed' got up there. It's a just a Wordpress template.
- inactive, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2I agree yahoo mail is terrible !!!
- amped27, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2you would think they would show some actual creative variety. all of the sites look the same, show the flash honda site
if you don't know what i am talking about here is the link.
http://www.problemplayground.com/ - dilbert, on 08/26/2008, -5/+7Classic as in the classic movie "The Dark Knight"?
- inactive, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2buried for huffpo
- JCH897, on 08/26/2008, -1/+3I didn't see meatspin or lemonparty on that list....what's up with that?
- gaapgod, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2I liked the use of categories but clicking 50 times is never fun.
- MOJIRA, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2Not to mention a ***** list, ***** title, and ***** idea.
- kylethompson1, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2I love how they add their own website to the list, and praise it.
- banmeagaindigg, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2*ahem*
http://www.dump.com - fnv2001, on 08/26/2008, -1/+3
More Importantly, Where is the porn section? - stutimandal, on 08/26/2008, -1/+3Born in 2008 and already classic? Buried.
- diggtochina, on 08/26/2008, -2/+4***** you and your multiple clicks to see things..
- autoy, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2I can't begin to explain how disgustingly ugly is the layout and design of http://www.pcmag.com It will surely be on my next list of "Top 100 ugly site designs" and -by popular demand- "Top 100 awful calssic web designs".
- tedrock, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2garbage
- captZEEbo, on 08/26/2008, -1/+3on the 100 best and top classic websites of 1998
- mk3k, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2classic and best!
- digginamish, on 08/26/2008, -0/+2Does anyone else find it odd that they are declaring a best of the year list before the year is actually over? Are they trying to beat the year-end rush?
- Len4a, on 08/29/2008, -0/+1Hmm what somebody thinks is not a not an indicator. Opinions are always subjective!
- HorseloverFat8, on 08/27/2008, -0/+1http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=JGWqtwhS2KY
- gmtwilight, on 08/27/2008, -0/+1Buried. Has xkcd but not Hulu.
- roarus, on 08/31/2008, -0/+1goatse?
- ptFoe, on 08/27/2008, -0/+1http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/
looks interesting - dougbot, on 07/14/2009, -0/+1no http://www.freerice.com ? Lame.
- Versh, on 08/26/2008, -0/+1Agreed. But try this configuration:
http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow/0,1206,l=231195&s=2 ...
it's somewhat better... sort of. -
Show 51 - 96 of 96 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is