What is Digg?49 Comments
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -3/+24Excellent article and a great read.
Scientists did have data about the formation of the universe and the short lived stars, also big bang was considered merely a theory by most, but this computer simulation of how the few stars were formed proofs the fact that big bang really did occur and how short lived stars were formed 300 million years after the Big Bang. But the question still remains, how did these first stars died? - inactive, on 08/01/2008, -0/+12Those first stars sound pretty much like me when I was younger.....I just never died. ;-D
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -0/+10The rest are all Grunts
- terminalcode, on 08/01/2008, -1/+11Really great article...awesome!!
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -0/+8Wow way to bring the science
- spen949, on 08/01/2008, -2/+9Your right, I should just sit down and shut up while the most ignorant people in our society continue to push their worldview into our public schools and governmental policy.
It's politically correct pussies like you that allowed them to get this far in the first place! - ironeus, on 08/01/2008, -3/+9I like the poetic analogy, they're like the Kirk Cobain of our universe.
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -0/+6This article is why the NTL GEO channel has become my fav.
- fegul, on 08/01/2008, -0/+6Only the good die young...
Or so I've heard. - louiebaur, on 08/01/2008, -0/+6Good find! This is an excellent article.
- SaladCactusKing, on 08/01/2008, -0/+6Once known as thetans...
- spen949, on 08/01/2008, -3/+8But..but wait I thought the universe was only 10,000 years old! My entire world view is closing in around me! Noooooooooooooo
- ebcreasoner, on 08/01/2008, -0/+5What?
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -0/+5The universe is an amazing place, great article.
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -0/+5"We" get it, but do they?
- JulyZerg, on 08/01/2008, -0/+5TRANSLATION: I am a fundamentalist. I hate science, and am a hypocrite because I am using a computer.
I have a question for you, then. What was there before "God" created the universe? Did he bang a universe out of no universe?
Biggup to preachers for some lame ass theories still! - JulyZerg, on 08/02/2008, -0/+4TRANSLATION: Science IS cool, just not when it contradicts your views.
- leerayIG88, on 08/01/2008, -0/+4What did these 'monsters' eat?
- BXRWXR, on 08/01/2008, -0/+3Except stars can't put shotguns in their mouths.
- notoneofus, on 08/01/2008, -0/+3Kirk Cobain? And I swear...that I don't...have...a...GUN.
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -1/+4Word. Religion doesn't deserve one iota of respect.
- SQLserver, on 08/01/2008, -2/+5Yeah, we get it, Creationists are really stupid, but please: You're giving atheists a bad name with all the sarcasm and trolling.
- wankelrotary, on 08/01/2008, -0/+3Answer unclear. Please try again.
- twertyto, on 08/02/2008, -0/+3So what's your point? Scientific theories are best explanations for certain behavior that are based on observational facts and verifiable physical laws. People who say "just a theory" usually understand nothing about the process.
- rz8472, on 08/02/2008, -0/+3I think this has been known for a while. The size of a star and how long it will survive is inversely exponential, while the largest stars only surviving for a few million years until running out of fuel and going supernova. Conversely, it is speculated that the universe is not yet old enough for some of the smallest red dwarfs from burning out. But during that time, their nuclear fusion creates the heavy elements that are critical for the formation of terrestrial planets. If this did not happen, then every atom in the universe would be hydrogen.
In other words, every part of our body was once part of a fusion reaction taking place in one of these massive, short-lived supergiant stars. - imdeanlabouty, on 08/01/2008, -0/+3It's Kurt, you *****.
- daflo, on 08/01/2008, -0/+2Themselves.
- harrisbradley, on 08/01/2008, -1/+3...yeah but the first star gazer was a Spartan
- Pixelante, on 08/02/2008, -0/+2Live fast, die young, leave a good-looking black hole.
- JakeyG14, on 08/01/2008, -0/+1So are dinosaur "photos" though. You just need to use your imagination a bit.
http://home9.inet.tele.dk/mha/Images/jesus-dinosau ... - FORELS, on 08/02/2008, -1/+2***** god! God didnt create *****.... Energy doesnt start or finish...And science IS cool!!! but this ***** is dumb!
- DeskFlyer, on 08/02/2008, -0/+1Billy Joel approves.
- mriegger, on 08/02/2008, -0/+1I think I would be happy to die young at the tender age of one million
- fluxion, on 08/02/2008, -0/+1read a theory a while back that the first stars were made out of dark matter. that wouldve been awesome
- inactive, on 08/02/2008, -0/+1hehe
- twertyto, on 08/02/2008, -0/+1These are known as Population III stars and they have been theorized for some time now but nothing has been known about their nature. The fact that no Pop III stars have been found yet in the field suggest an explanation just as this but theory is only recently catching up with speculation.
- disrupter, on 08/01/2008, -5/+5I'm getting laid tonite :)
- rosekevin, on 08/01/2008, -0/+0So the stars were actually governed by the Covenant in the beginning
- inactive, on 08/01/2008, -1/+1I've got PHOTOS!!!!! oh yeah... it's a computer model. Great theory that I truly find fascinating... but in the end, it's just a theory.
- spen949, on 08/01/2008, -0/+0And what is this maverick of astronomys' theory for the creation of the universe then? Oh...lemme guess..GODDIDIT?
Thanks for playing. - soso33, on 11/20/2008, -0/+0
Thank you for the useful information
افلام
, توبيكات
,
منتديات
,
دردشه
,
برامج
,
فساتين
,
اناشيد اطفال
,
دليل مواقع
,
مسلسل الاجنحه المنكسره ,
مسجات - babygirlcrib, on 11/15/2008, -0/+0http://generalelectricdishwasher.blogspot.com/
http://davisweatherstation.blogspot.com/
http://designerbabybeddingreviews.blogspot.com/
http://roundcribbeddingreviews.blogspot.com/
http://babygirlcribbeddingreviews.blogspot.com/
http://dianevonfurstenbergluggage.blogspot.com/
http://zerohalliburtonluggage.blogspot.com/
http://sheepskinseatcovers.blogspot.com/
http://bedspreadsandcomforters.blogspot.com/
http://daybedcomfortersets.blogspot.com/ - honeybrass, on 08/02/2008, -0/+0And this article is about when the universe was spartan, so somewhat apt don't you think?
- honeybrass, on 08/02/2008, -0/+0So.... when do the "End of dark ages" tours start? I want my own photos too.
- bees1210, on 08/04/2008, -0/+0Great article...and even better because the picture is a visualization made by my cousin xD
- oilcan, on 08/02/2008, -1/+0i see you resorted to chiding remarks without even thinking about examining some of the information in the link which I so graciously included to assist in your understanding of an alternative theory. well played. how will I ever recover!
and no, sorry but Big Bang is way more akin to GODDIDIT than the theories of Arp, Lerner, and other plasma physicists here and there. however, you obviously don't care, so I won't bother elaborating for you any further. bye now, have a nice day! :) - inactive, on 08/01/2008, -3/+0Tell Mrs. Palm that she owes me money.
- oilcan, on 08/01/2008, -7/+0the only difference between Big Bang and Creation is a relatively few years. Both of them fail to capture the grand ages it would require to form even our local supercluster, and both presume a pretty magical set of circumstances for the act of a beginning to a universe.
if you want to learn more about why I say these things check out Halton Arp and Eric Lerner. The primary 'proof' of big bang is 'redshift', which is popularly explained only by doppler effect. yet there are binary galactic systems, in other words adjacent, that have vastly different redshifts. Big Bang theorists answer this conundrum by saying they look only adjacent, when there is incredibly obvious observation of distended isophotes indicating that they are in fact adjacent....but yet with vastly different redshifts. this blows apart the redshift = expansion paradigm, but because Big Bang is so loved and embraced by mainstream cosmology dogma that all evidence that refutes it is swept under the rug, blocked from publication, and the scientists that present the refutational data ostracized by the cosmology community.
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm
this is a very basic good start for anybody interested in exploring just how screwed up modern cosmology is. now proceed to digg me way down ye devoted acolytes of modern dogma! - FORELS, on 08/01/2008, -11/+1Big Bang theory is for losers who must have an explanation for things they will never understand.... Like as if there would have been nothing at all before that big bang *****.... Then suddenly out of no Universe bangs out a Universe... *****! But biggup to Hawkins and his Robo-Voice for some kick ass theories still!
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 