What is Digg?67 Comments
- ThePhilomath, on 10/12/2007, -4/+68Reducing Your Memory Usage In Firefox
There has been a lot of talk about how to optimize Firefox to run the most efficiently. CNet%u2019s most recent article goes through some helpful tips but doesn%u2019t jump into many details. Here I am going to explain which extensions have memory leaks or will slow down Firefox%u2019s performance.
First, before I dive into the main topic there are a few things that you should change in your Firefox settings if you really want to optimize this. Just follow this tutorial that I put together.
Okay, now let%u2019s talk about the extensions. This is the point that you may want to turn your head because I am about to bring some truth to some of the most popular extensions.
1. IE Tab 1.0.7! Yes, it is true that one of the most convenient extensions has a memory leak. I can%u2019t say that I am super shocked by this because how efficient can it be to run Internet Explorer in Firefox?
2. Session Saver 0.2.1.031 has a known memory leak.
3. ForecastFox 0.8.5 also has a memory leak%u2026and that very disappointing since most Firefox users have this sitting in their toolbar (so what is the weather like by you :) ).
4. Filterset.G Updater AND FlashGot used in conjunction will produce a memory leak.
5. FasterFox doesn%u2019t have a memory leak specifically, but it will not help your Firefox performance. It does help your browsing performance but if you decide to keep this extension at least make sure you don%u2019t have prefetching enabled.
6. Tabbrowser Extensions doesn%u2019t have memory leaks either but will definitely slow Firefox down and it has many conflicts with other extension. It can even stop Firefox from being able to startup! A better alternative is Tab Mix or Tab Mix Plus which offer the same set of features. If you don%u2019t need all the features of Tab Mix Plus then just use Tab Mix to lower the memory usage a little.
7. Please check for updates to ensure you are using the most recent version of the following extensions: Adblock 0.5.3.042, AdBlock Plus 0.6.1.1, NoScript 1.1.3.9, Search Keys 0.7.3, Thumbs 0.6.2 %u2014 each of these extensions HAD known memory leaks but they have now been fixed.
That is about it for the most popular Firefox extensions that have been tested. Another important thing to do is upgrade to Firefox 1.5.0.1 if you haven%u2019t already. This build has fixed two memory leaks that were very common: leak when selecting and leak from global scope polluter. The latest trunk also has a long list of memory leak fixes so keep your eyes peeled for a new release of Firefox.
That should eleviate the digg effect. - eklitzke, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14Coral cached link: http://tech.cybernetnews.com.nyud.net:8080/2006/04/04/reducing-your-memory-usage-in-firefox/
- jaguar, on 10/12/2007, -2/+10a cleaned up and abridged version:
1. IE Tab 1.0.7
2. Session Saver 0.2.1.031
3. ForecastFox 0.8.5
4. Filterset.G Updater AND FlashGot used in conjunction
5. FasterFox (if you have prefetching enabled)
6. Tabbrowser Extensions
7. non-updated Adblock 0.5.3.042, AdBlock Plus 0.6.1.1, NoScript 1.1.3.9, Search Keys 0.7.3, Thumbs 0.6.2
Edit: Why is the previous comment being modded down? I just posted the text for those that can't get to the page! I'm sorry that the comment system wouldn't let me edit it. - richwklein, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9We know Forecastfox 0.8.5 has some memory leaks. We are planning on doing a full leak analysis for 1.0. In the mean time, I've been actively working on resolving some of the leaks, and I think I've made some good progress for our 0.9 release.
- ArisBoch, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7I use everyone of those listed. Plus a few more. I think I once saw Firefox using 330 MB of RAM on my machine. So I think the solution is obvious: I'm going to have to buy more RAM :) If anyone needs me, I'll be browsing Newegg.
- Strangers, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7A lot of the best ones are there unfortunately.
Digg - feanor512, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4When I tried it, the Google Safe Browsing extension took up ~35MB of RAM and crashed Firefox a lot.
- dashifen, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Thanks for your hard work!
- bmobile, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6Agreed...a lot of the best ones are there but I was able to find out some that I had no idea were even out there. For example, ForecastFox is friggin awesome!
- jfox00, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I really think everyone is "digging" this article, becuase they really WANT a way to decrease the memory footprint. Hey Firefox developer guys, you hear us!? I tried uninstalling a few of these, I've tweaked every memory setting in my about:config, and my firefox still climbs right up to 200,000K of memory after about 8 hours of use. I know, I should just close firefox and reopen it. And i do. But I dont have to do this with Outlook, or IE, or Trillian, or my own applications. Something is still not right. And its hard to recommend an amazing browser like firefox when I can't trust the way it manages the memory.
- Xoligy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3It's being modded down because it's not needed. They aren't modding it down because they have a personal vengeance against you.
- techferret, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5Some of us never think about the extensions as one of the problems related to Firefox's obvious Memory Leak. Its nice to know which extensions are causing leaks. I'll think twice about the extensions that I have on my computer (except for the Adblock-Filterset.G Updater>__
- mvprj84, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3My host and I have gotten the site back up.
- maggoty, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3the memory problem used to be a big hassle for me, but since 1.5 has come along and also since I've settled on a number of extensions that all seem to work with each other and not crap out, everything has been fine.
Flashblock caused me so much heart ache when I think about it. I don't use it anymore, but since then, firefox takes about 85megs on average, and is finally stable. - rollercoaster37, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I'm running FF2a1 - It's using less than half of the RAM 1.5 would consume (Although, that was never a major problem for me - I've got plenty of RAM.)
- asym, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3@metal guru: Almost all of the GUI customization in Opera is drag-and-drop, similiar to Firefox, except categorized and more powerful. The customization combined with the trashcan feature was enough to get me to switch within about 10 minutes of using the product.
- mvprj84, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4After talking to my host they informed me that there was an attack on my site...they are actively trying to fix it.
- zizzybaloobah, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Since I've upgraded Adblock plus and Filterset G. Updater, I've noticed a signifcant improvement in performance and reduction in memory usage. I am also using Tab Mix Plus, IE View, Web Developer, and del.icio.us extensions among others.
- haxx4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I look forward to the improved versions. Thanks!
- VeganG, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4At least they mention that Adblock is fixed.
- ViperDaimao, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2One of my extensions or some combonation of settings and extensions absolutely hates going to espn.com Often I'll go there, and firefox will simple close down with no warning or error message.
- 511pf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Google Safe Browsing didn't crash Firefox for me, but it did use a bunch of RAM and noticeably slowed down Firefox.
- vertigoblue, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2run a gig of memory and your fine...
- terminalpariah, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I've got Safe Browsing but I haven't noticed any significant increase in RAM usage. I have a tonne of extensions and I cap out at about 30MB.
- ZachPruckowski, on 10/12/2007, -6/+8I'll use Opera when it gets an easy-to-use adblocker. the ones it has now for OS X are too complicated.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Opera is okay. I use it once in awhile for something different, but it doesn't come remotely close to the tools & features I have set up on Firefox.
- mistshadow2k4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I just uninstalled forecastfox, restarted firefox and now it's only using 30 megs of memory. That's roughly the same amount of memory that Opera uses. When they get that fixed in forecastfox I'll use it again, but until then I can live without it.
- dan00b, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4i was looking for that :-D
- Chaos12, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2i only use 2 so thats good.
- loqqq, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2An almost identical list is available at http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=354828#2051115
- SmartAlx, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2“I don't know where you get your "facts" but you have negative diggs and that's a fact.”
Because my comments are in a community heavily populated by Firefox Fans. Diggs do not equal facts. They are opinions. But memory footprint, speed, and features are facts. Opera is ahead of the game in both. And besides, I can’t help but to notice that you also have negative diggs. - mvprj84, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I didn't say that prefetching makes browsing slower, I said that you should disable it because it slows down Firefox. Read Mozilla's articles, they say to disable it too.
- truebullfan, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2i have most of those on the list and i usually cap around 70 mb.
- Metal_Guru, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I was (still am) impartial to the popularity of the browser when choosing, but I found Firefox easier to use nevertheless. I've given others a choice between Firefox and Opera when switching from IE, and they chose Firefox in the end after running both. Opera just has too many buttons laying around that are no always needed and hard to get rid of easily. Overall, it's harder for even an experienced user like me to customize it, let alone noobs.
Sure, there are many that will find it a piece of cake, but I've found that there are many more that don't. - Burmask, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1But it's still CSS 2.0 compliant.......these extensions are the Achilles heel of firefix. Maybe if they charged for it and developed a profit model then good developers could get paid to fix the problems. Until then, it's just still CSS 2.0 compliant.
- Flux0r, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4Related Story:
http://www.digg.com/software/10_Ways_To_Optimize_Firefox - Danie, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Is there any way of seeing how much memory each extension actually is using?
- SmeRndmGy, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1ha they tell you to disable fasterfox prefetching, the very thing which makes it faster. They claim it does not make browsing any faster. I know fore sure that it DOES make it faster. Maybe they are saying that because they don't like how it causes extra bandwidth use costs on their servers. At very least they shouldnt lie about it though.
- HvitRavn, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2Firefox requires extensions to be a memory hog? I didn't know. I thought it already did the job quite well itself.
- teh_toaster, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2Article text:
http://www.shorttext.com/tenny - Peacemaker, on 10/12/2007, -1/+01. Don't leave your browser open all day long, especially if your running windows!
2. Memory is cheap, get more memory! - richwklein, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0With Mozilla's XPCOM classes your extension can cross programming language boundaries. Javascript can call C++ which can call Python etc.. A lot of leaks are caused by circular references between objects that cross language boundaries so they are never released. Here is a good explanation http://www.mozilla.org/scriptable/avoiding-leaks.html. I also think bug #206520 is another reason alot of extensions leak.
- MyNameIsLee, on 10/12/2007, -6/+5quit being a fanboy....we don't care which product you think is better.
- alphamerik, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Thanks for posting the text!
Why do these extensions even cause memory leaks? To make these extensions cross-platform they have to be written in Javascript. Javascript has basically no memory management. Are these developers dumb and creating ever-expanding arrays or is there some more basic issue with Javascript in Firefox? - Leech, on 10/12/2007, -6/+4damn digg effect...
- osuchasenuts, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2Sigh...
Can someone just post a page of text that has what extensions the website lists - MyNameIsLee, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2"It IS better. It's not an opinion. It's a fact."
I don't know where you get your "facts" but you have negative diggs and that's a fact. - davidmonaghan, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1"500 Internal Server Error"
Sounds interesting though, will check out mirrors and copies... Thanks. - Pentarix, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2haha firefox crashed while viewing that page... what a p.o.s.
-
Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is