6 Comments
- p9s50W5k4GUD2c6, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3O'Reilly will get barbequed for this arrogant legal stunt.
WEB 2.0! There - I said it! - p9s50W5k4GUD2c6, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2According to Google, the term "Web 2.0" appears 77,700,000 times on the web.
Just how many lawyers DO you have Timmy Boy? - playfulmind, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1this link was the original but the dup got more popular, that kinda sucks
http://digg.com/technology/O%E2%80%99Reilly_trademarks_%E2%80%9CWeb_2.0%E2%80%B3_and_sets_lawyers_on_IT@Cork#c1812040 - blogsceptic, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Hahahahha
What an idiot - postapoc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1dead link
flickr link
http://www.flickr.com/photos/traftery/153074441/ - danco, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0O'Reilly is only claiming that this is copyrighted in association with conferences. This is because they have a conference called the "Web 2.0 Conference". They aren't trying to make wide sweeping claims. They're just trying to protect the trademark of their conference. Whether you think that they should try to protect this, don't blow it out of proportion.


What is Digg?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our