What is Digg?Sponsored by HTC
Who knows you better than your phone? view!
youtube.com - See you from the perspective of your phone.
19 Comments
- unloud, on 10/11/2007, -0/+14Here are the actual greasemonkey scripts individually:
*Header Navigation Switcher: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8507
*ToDo List: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/3827
*Display Current Time: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/7873
*Gmail Secure: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1404
(sorry, the edit box on my previous post timed out) - javip, on 10/11/2007, -2/+12Buried as lame for using IE7 =D
- stephenwq, on 10/11/2007, -1/+4@unloud
"Javascript hackers have come up with some great Greasemonkey user scripts that make GCal easier to use, so I've compiled a few of my favorites into a single Firefox extension"
Perhaps for 1 click ease of use with a toggle on/off?
As it says, its a compilation. - cruzlee, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3NOTE: The ToDO list sucks, because it is stored locally.
- unloud, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3Why didn't they just release it as a greasemonkey script?
- cruzlee, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Wow, this is very cool. I like the bigger view it enables.
One question; why doesn't the ToDo allow me to add a task?
EDIT: I found out: because I didn't restart FF for the 2nd time. Works now! - srok, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@srok (#6693296)
oops... in the scripts that "Unloud" noted (thanks, btw) he lists one for a To Do list that doesn't store info on the web... but the author of that script points out this script as being one that does.
http://gimite.ddo.jp/archive/user_js/googlecalendartodolist.user.js
(copied from http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/3827 ) - Flipsen, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Thanks for that to-do list, that was my only gripe with Google Calendar.
- srok, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@cruzlee (#6689810)
On this page http://lifehacker.com/photogallery/Better-GCal/1860668
it says "View a task list on the left sidebar. (Tasks are stored in GCal and are therefore available from any computer.)"
Haven't checked it out yet myself, so I don't know. I think I will go with the Greasemonkey scripts for
A) more control over the scripts
B) no restart of FF (always a plus)
C) better for individual component updates - Goosemaster, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1well that sucks...
- rawdiggie, on 12/04/2007, -0/+0very useful functions...and thx a lot for the to-do list
- syafthegeek, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Cool Firefox extensions. I will try it.
- um1001, on 10/23/2009, -0/+0Crazy that it is finally coming out http://worldofwarcraftvideo.org
- HeikoBe, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Great Firefox Extension
- hebbet, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Air Skin is form me.
- infekt, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0Filed under "useful"...
- unloud, on 10/11/2007, -4/+1Yeah, but greasemonkey gives the exact same toggle options if they would have just listed each section individually and let people choose. I guess as a programmer I don't like redundant interfaces and I don't like it being called a greasemonkey script since it's actually an extension formulated from one and doesn't allow any of the flexibility that greasemonkey does.
It also slightly irks me that they credit "Gina Trapani" and don't list the original script writers, although this is listed in the addon "help" section - nick0909, on 10/11/2007, -10/+294 diggs and no comments... is this thing good or bad or what?
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -16/+2Buried as lame doesn't work with IE7
Screw you guys I am going home.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is