What is Digg?Sponsored by Travelzoo
Take Advantage of Ridiculously Low Holiday Airfares view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year. But move on it now.
46 Comments
- cr125er, on 10/12/2007, -0/+25Come on, all those incriminating names don't just Sharpie themselves out! Give them some time to cover stuff up!
- ewy99, on 10/12/2007, -2/+21@stupidppl: Please tell us what the HELL you hope to accomplish by CONSTANTLY posting this stuff on DIGG? By now, everyone is so SICK of seeing this stuff on here that I am sure noone is going to say, "Oh, gee, he keeps posting it OVER AND OVER so he must be right!". Please, if you want to discuss the issue on Digg, then fine, DISCUSS IT ON DIGG! Don't just post a stupid myspace link!
(Sorry, Digg. Just one of those days where this finally made me boil over) - BigSlacker, on 10/12/2007, -2/+19The dirty secret is that millions of documents can't be processed instantly. Shocking!
- Odweaver, on 10/12/2007, -2/+15You would of probably got dugg up if you left it at the first two lines, after that it is all tinfoil hat jokes.
- coreyb, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7@fernandez
That is what the little green thumbs up is for...
/reply abuse - catalysis, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7Check Sandy Burger's pants.
- bflfab, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Another problem that is encountered is that old documents will be marked with "Declassify on: OADR"
OADR means Originating Agency's Determination Required. The problem is that sometimes the originating agency doesn't exist anymore and there isn't really any process for reviewing this material. A lot of the time stuff that really could be out in the open is sitting around because there isn't anyone to say it is OK. - ewy99, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4stupidppl has gone by several names in the past. He has a history of spamming this same stuff on NUMEROUS topics. His username is deleted and he signs up under a new name and continues with the spamming so it is a LONG history of doing this.
- thcobbs, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4To whom are you referring Groovemaster? If it's yourself, then you really need to re-evaluate what you define as a "semi-functioning brain"
- OnAnyMouse, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Some of the most damning are already available.
Did you, for instance, like the Machurian Candidate? Request CIA MORI ID 140401, and 17748
A few links, and links to links to... Some are blogs. none are mine. I intend no spam. ymmv...etc.etc.etc..
http://www.laborlawtalk.com/showthread.php?t=97434
http://www.google.com/search?q=CIA%27s+MKULTRA
http://peyote.com/jonstef/mkultra.htm - UglieJosh, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Since you want to talk about understanding English.........
I think you meant "objectively" and not "subjectively" in your original post. Unless you meant you want people to be capable of believing in illusions.......
subjective (adj.) Existing only in the mind; illusory - 5blocksfree, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You forget...the archivists are small potatoes compared to the cost of contracts to build new facilities, upgrade those that need it, or provide related services. It certainly wouldn't surprise me if this work was going to someone who is a friend or relative of someone in the Congress or Whitehouse.
- Groovemaster, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Disgust at my ability to understand the fact that steel-framed hi-rise buildings don't fall into their own footprints at the same speed an object would fall unimpeded due to fire (WTC7), or disgust at the fact that I'm braver than you are?
Either way, you have my sympathy. It must suck being unable to face reality. - naldwell, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Soon? He's already started... Hell, Roosevelt started it. He just didn't plan for it to be as repugnant as it is now...
- undergroundman, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2This ***** should have been processed beforehand so that it was released on time. If the law is ambiguous about that, it shouldn't be.
- cbergeron, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1It's not millions of documents, it's millions of _pages_. Most of these documents will consist of more than a dozen pages (depending on their content) with some of them (like the Somalia Study Group Report) consisting of just under a thousand pages.
- AniceAtheist, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3Don't click, it is a spammer site. Ban this digg user and the IP
- nusuni, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2By your logic you better start acting nicer towards him or he may put you in jail *rolls eyes*
- nusuni, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Its Sandy Berger btw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Berger - adml_shake, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2You realize that as a "former CIA agent" you're of course being watched that that a bullet is about to find its way to your head.....if what your saying was true.
- JesusIsSatan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"To manage all this secrecy -- to store it, secure it, process it -- costs the country $7.7 billion in 2005, Leonard says."
An $8 billion annual budget and they have only 50 archivists???! WTF???! I hope I find out about the aliens they are hiding in Area 51 since the 1950s before I die. Mulder, you were right. - Travisx2, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1If we really want these documents to be processed in our lifetimes, we'd hire Google to sort this out.
It might also be cheaper than paying 50 people to go through paper files by hand for the rest of their lives. - Giga, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PEBKAC would be more suitable, as it doesn't ruin the surprise until they visit the page (unless they already know what it stands for).
- saichele, on 10/12/2007, -5/+5how in the hell did that comment intended for an entirely different thread end up here, Digg!? WTF?!
- LGgeek, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Maybe they should get Google to help them process the documents but wait then they would have to let Google disclose them (:-
- Cl1mh4224rd, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I can't speak for all the others, but I certainly didn't digg you down out of fear, Groovemaster. It's a feeling more akin to disgust...
- BigSlacker, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2The IRS has the best facility for it. I say ditch the income tax and use their labor pool.
- Groovemaster, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1You're right. I meant to say that people will no longer be swayed by subjectivity.
Thanks for the correction. :) - OnAnyMouse, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1That's where I've seen those ears before!
Bush is the Brain! Notice that he and Pinky got reel quiet just as election year 2000 ramped up...snarf! - Johnagain, on 10/12/2007, -4/+3Moron
- noddyxoi, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1I wish there was a mass digg down button.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2My ebay experience has been wonderful, I am not sure what your problem is.
- Groovemaster, on 10/12/2007, -6/+3"To whom are you referring Groovemaster?"
If you aren't capable of understanding English by now, how do you expect me to help you? - bobertfishbone, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1@ coreyb
that is what the little red thumbs down is for... - torp, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1I haven't seen it what is it?
- BigSlacker, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1Sandy Burger Pants = Porn star name?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -7/+3stupidppl == ischle?
- fernandez, on 10/12/2007, -8/+4@ odweaver
agreed - torp, on 10/12/2007, -6/+2Ok now I saw it. It's toolish but you act like the guy came and peed on your bedspread. Who cares?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1Bush has sand in his vagina.
- formerCIAagent, on 10/12/2007, -9/+2america is becoming a police state. soon bush will declare martial law and try to take over the world.
- Groovemaster, on 10/12/2007, -12/+4"You would of probably got dugg up if you left it at the first two lines, after that it is all tinfoil hat jokes."
It'd be pretty obvious to anyone with a semi-functioning brain that I wasn't expecting to be dugg up. Hence the "gullible, fearful majority" comment. - saichele, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1I've had great luck with ebay as a whole, but the user base is becoming suckier and suckier. What's the solution for that?
- sdrawkcaB, on 10/12/2007, -11/+2Oh dear, people can't read documents that probably don't matter.
- NCRider, on 10/12/2007, -19/+10***comment deleted***
***cause: too intelligent for public release*** - Groovemaster, on 10/12/2007, -27/+8The thing I find amusing about the release of these documents is that they're always covered in black marks over the parts that matter. Kind of defeats the purpose of releasing them.
As an aside, the fact that 9/11 was an inside job will only be self-evident to the majority of people in a few hundred years or so, when they're both capable of subjectivity and better educated as to what is physically possible and what isn't.
In the meantime, we have no choice but to let the gullible, fearful majority marvel at the Emperor's new clothes.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is