Sponsored by Threadless
$9 t-shirts today only view!
threadless.com - Today's the day to snag a deal on t-shirts! Threadless.com. $9. Every. Single. Tee.
79 Comments
- unluckier, on 05/09/2008, -2/+55Sounds like a scheme to get page views and clicks, if you ask me...
- GRTWHT, on 05/09/2008, -6/+45Burying to try to stop this asshat from getting page views for NOT identifying the vulnerability.
Identify it and I would support him 100%, pull this crap and he's just a lowlife. - fuhcough, on 05/09/2008, -2/+31I'm discovered both the meaning of life AND the location of the fountain of youth... I've hidden both in my eBay auction's high bidder notification email........
- Chucara, on 05/09/2008, -3/+31Somewhere in my van, I've hidden candy.. Just come on in to check it out.. Really..
Buried for same reasons as above. - MrFurious2k, on 05/09/2008, -4/+19Translation: My blog needs hits!
- ironmim, on 05/09/2008, -7/+19IE is a giant bug !
- michaelGregoire, on 05/09/2008, -0/+10Non-IE page views anyway. IF I used IE I wouldn't be visiting his site anytime soon.
- SevenTwo, on 05/09/2008, -5/+15Using IE is the bug.
- kris33, on 05/09/2008, -0/+9Do you have any idea of what you are talking about? IE8 is still in beta 1 and is not even close to pass the ACID3Â test.
- justjoehere, on 05/09/2008, -1/+10Talk about social engineering...
- Bigbro69, on 05/09/2008, -0/+7Obviously you don't...
- pdiddy827, on 05/09/2008, -10/+16IE nothing but bugs
- DanBoodro, on 05/09/2008, -0/+5"When triggered, Raff's proof-of-concept code launches two copies of Microsoft's calculator software on the victim's computer, but it could be altered to do something malicious."
Divide by zero? - inactive, on 05/09/2008, -1/+6WTF?! I guess that doesn't surprise me. Well.....yeah it does!
- mikephimikephi, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5I'm digging you down because I don't want to see another one of those god-damn comment threads that are 50 responses long and they all start with
"*obligatory -insert dumbass comment" - ElbertF, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4So? 6 and 7 could also still be victim of a zero-day exploit.
- iRelinquish, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4and then later to see it on the front page as a .gif
- AlfredR, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_day_attack
- shadowspawn, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3I'd think it would be any OS's (win32/win64) IE, since it has to do with registry changes...
- mikephimikephi, on 05/09/2008, -1/+4Don't digg much, do you?
- luchid, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2Link?
Besides 16k people is NOTHING compared to the amount of people who got had by IE's ***** security. That number is more in the hundreds of millions. - FKnight, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2I clicked that KNOWING it was a Rick-Roll. I love that song.
- purzzzell, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2I like puzzles. Unfortunately, I'm not programming savvy enough to solve this one :(
- VortexSpin, on 05/09/2008, -2/+4I stopped using IE when it began breaking webpages...
- purzzzell, on 05/09/2008, -5/+7Dugg b/c the idea was TO get hits for the purpose of forcing a patch - he said he made them aware of the vulnerability, since they didn't patch it immediately, he was going public.
Just announcing it would have gotten a little publicity, making a game of it makes it HUGE, which forces them to patch it more quickly. - netsnake24, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2If there was a company called windows... amateurs!
- grumpyrain, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2What I want to know is whether it can get around protected mode and UAC.
- ElbertF, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2Who wears pants? And why?
- inactive, on 05/09/2008, -2/+4On my web page I've hidden pr0n. See if you can find it.
- jeriqo, on 05/09/2008, -1/+3Digg users are full of frustration and jealousy, this is not surprising at all.
- mikephimikephi, on 05/09/2008, -0/+2I think if IE8 emulated IE6, that would make it truly useful for developers.
(yes, i'm aware of ie tab in FF) - nakedman, on 05/09/2008, -2/+4I agree. Windows sure is a crap company.
- Lubinski, on 05/12/2008, -0/+1Sorry wrong wording. Let me substitute in Microsoft. My Bad. They do have to be more agile though.
- pudds, on 05/09/2008, -1/+2What a dick.
- kevdotbadger, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1You got multiple IEs? (google it). You get standalone versions of 3.0/4.01/5.01/5.5/6. It's awesome, although i agree that if IE8 had the ability to emu IE6 it would be perfect (well, when i say perfect...).
- kevdotbadger, on 05/09/2008, -3/+4It's in his pants.
- dygel, on 05/09/2008, -3/+4Supremely lame. "Boost my traffic and ad revenue to find the 0day vulnerability!"
2-to-1 says there is no exploit. - AlfredR, on 05/09/2008, -1/+2You know, if the bug was actually in firefox, telling people you hid an IE vulnerability would be a great way to drive them there.
- inactive, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1I go on the Internet. That "majority" you speak off are the morons who don't know any better and just use the computer for email and chat.
- grumpyrain, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1No, much worse than that. It could even install Norton on the unsuspecting user.
- RubineBoy, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1Is this the google van?
- luchid, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1Daok: market share for IE means NOTHING. Of course it's going to have the biggest market share, it's ***** shoved down everyone's throat, bundled in with Windows!
- HillerMylife, on 07/24/2008, -1/+2This sounds like a really obscure bug.
- RubineBoy, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1Yeah! Pics or it didn't happen!
- galvo, on 05/09/2008, -2/+3I work in IT, and no one, and I mean no one, would ever take any browser over Firefox. Go ahead, call me a FF fan.. you sound like a corny ass IE douchebag fanboy. Look at all of your comments in this digg. You're an insecure piece of *****. Why do you feel the need to defend IE and bash Firefox when FF is clearly the better browser? Oh yeah, because you're an insecure piece of *****.
- wallyhartshorn, on 05/09/2008, -2/+2If you RTFA (*gasp*), you will see that he isn't keeping this a secret. He had already told Microsoft about the vulnerability, but after waiting a few days with no response, he decided to semi-publish the exploit as a way to put pressure on Microsoft to fix it more quickly.
From RTFA:
When he has followed Microsoft's responsible disclosure guidelines in the past, the company has been too slow to fix bugs, he said via instant message. "The last time I used their Responsible Disclosure policy it took them six months to fix one line of code."
He says that he will be publishing details of the exploit on Wednesday. - Shadowgamers, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1Now I wonder how many people will actually do it...
- MagicIcarus, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1Pshh, this is the same thing I tell girls.
"I've found your vulnerability in my pants. You will have to-" slap
Yeah, how come if it works for him it doesn't work for me? - netsnake24, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1you, I guess!
- FKnight, on 05/09/2008, -2/+2I noticed this 'researcher' didn't bother to mention which OS was vulnerable, seeing as IE under Vista (unlike XP) is locked inside an account restricted sandbox (unless you're a computer dork who turned off UAC because 'it's lame').
-
Show 51 - 80 of 80 discussions




What is Digg?