digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About
See the original image at tutzone.org

What Would Web 3.0 Look Like?

tutzone.org — The hottest topic for all geeks around the globe is just talking about technology. They are always excited in their own persona. When it comes to Web 3.0, experts have distributed predictions for its structure.

Who dugg this?

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

15 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • sithmaster, on 04/09/2009, -2/+9Oh man I am just getting a handle on web 2.0 lets not even THINK about 3.0!!
  • mwtapp, on 10/11/2009, -3/+8Smart phones, the cloud, & Wi-Max.
  • dcast, on 04/09/2009, -0/+3Isn't half of this stuff already available in "Web 2.0"? Remote logins? Online storage space? Internet on portable devices? Internet radio?
  • inactive, on 04/09/2009, -1/+4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web
  • arsenyv, on 04/10/2009, -0/+2Web 3.0 would look like a bunch of logos combined into an abortion? Pass.
  • GroundIsSound, on 04/10/2009, -0/+1organic LED? just saying it sounds awesome.
  • vili89, on 04/10/2009, -0/+1So web 3.0 will be interesting innovation, but what is the purpose of it.
    Everything is supported now.
  • fluidfoundation, on 04/10/2009, -0/+1Whatever it looks like, I'll be looking at it in Firefox.
  • sanjayvyas21, on 04/10/2009, -0/+1waiting for these excellent online services........
  • Falldog, on 04/10/2009, -0/+1Something like this, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3XzPhdBx9g
  • Anukul, on 04/09/2009, -2/+2Gosh!
    And I thought I was just catching up with Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 is on prowl already..
  • jcre8tive, on 04/11/2009, -0/+0It's not surprising that people are going to try and be the first to come up with a reason to coin the term "Web 3.0" and have it actually mean something. After all, "Web 2.0" did wonders for O'Reilly. But I haven't seen a definition or set of parameters yet that actually sets Web 3.0 apart. Maybe one day....but as far as I'm concerned, the true elements of 3.0 probably haven't even been imagined yet.
  • shinkou, on 04/10/2009, -1/+1Web 3.0 Fail
    World Wide Web FTW!
  • lms1, on 04/10/2009, -0/+0Interesting.
  • johnwiz, on 04/09/2009, -2/+2what would porn 3.0 look like?

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.