digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

Very Cool Javascript Effects Library

moofx.mad4milk.net — It's easy to use, fast, cross-browser, standards compliant, provides controls to modify Height, Width, and Opacity with builtin checks that won't let a user break the effect with multiple crazy clicks.

Who dugg this? Made popular Oct 27, 2005

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

35 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • tylermenezes, on 08/08/2008, -0/+1Digg is not your personal bookmark manager. Though you can use it as one, I guess.

    Comment necromancy.
  • mcspectrum, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I'll be sticking with scriptaculous, still cool tho.
  • donpdonp, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1check out openrico.org
  • billizm, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1eye candy effects are what help make modern apps apealing. ie: digg.com - when a user diggs a story, notice the fading effect? They didn't have to use eye candy javascript, but its cool.

    +digg
  • ryanguill, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Was just about to submit this. Does anyone else agree that digg's search sucks?
  • kewldude606, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I'm using it now to display stats on my clan's roster. You click the name and fragrate, etc comes up. Unfortunately, everything is fully open when the page loads and I can't figure out a way to make them start closed including placing an onLoad event in the tag.
  • 6dust, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"Java applets are highly compatible..."

    Depends on the applet. I've had a lot of trouble in my company with different JVM versions. Most people with Microsoft's VM have no problems, but with Sun's it all depends on what version number they have installed. Plus, if it's used on a secure site, the users have to login to the application w/ their browsers and again with the applet. Damn you Sun!

    Personally, I say go with Flash and server side remoting/web services. Less for the client to have to download, wide compatibility, less code than AJAX. Of course, I'm sure to be flamed for this opinion too... :)
  • tpimental, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I thought it was cool and just wanted it bookmarked for future reference... never expected it to get to the homepage ;)
  • ebenthurston, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2cool. dugg. rtphokie is a donkey.
  • Famouspunk, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"I've used this before. It's very nice."
    What did you use it for if I may ask? or is just something to have for fun and play around with?
  • freakystyley, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Doesn't work in Netscape 4.x! Hehehe, just kidding :P. Suh-weeeeet, just in time too... just when I was beginning to think that prototype.js was too simple and script.aculo.us was too heavy...
  • leprasmurf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"On an unrelated topic does anyone have any thoughts on whether to use an ActiveX applet or a Java applet on a webpage? (other than just "microsoft sucks")
    posted by spirion (1) at 11:33 AM 10/27/05"

    First and main thought: ActiveX applets are useful and very powerful, however they are not very good on compatibility; they don't work in any browser save IE. Java applets are highly compatibile and can be just as powerful.
  • Dan?!, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1A little ironic the page has JavaScript errors.
  • brian2k1, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I like Flash over Java/ActiveX or AJAX but the price to enter with the supported remoting is high. And there is still no way to protect the code since the entire file is downloaded and placed on the client before being executed.
  • Famouspunk, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Nice thing,but what can it be used for? I mean what's the purpose?
  • abrudtkuhl, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I've used this before. It's very nice.
  • senzafine, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0definitely cool. i'm using scriptaculous but this seems like a great implementation of prototype.js.
    +dugg
  • dave_colorado, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"On an unrelated topic does anyone have any thoughts on whether to use an ActiveX applet or a Java applet on a webpage? (other than just "microsoft sucks")
    posted by spirion (1) at 11:33 AM 10/27/05"

    personally, i'd avoid both if you can. if you absolutely must, make minimal use of activeX/java/flash.
  • perchef, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0just awesome...
    +dugg
  • adiaga, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0cool, I probably use it soon

    ---
    http://www.bluelightsoft.com
  • olivejuice, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0wow! makes me want to start working on my site.

    ++digg
  • standsolid, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0sweet, much better than script.aculo.us imho.

    Very light, easy to extend.

    +digg
  • kanenas.net, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0I am really going to use it !!!
  • sc0re, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0"A little ironic the page has JavaScript errors."

    LOL, yeah, I noticed that too. Still Dugg it though. It's time to freshen up a couple of sites and it's just what I was looking for.
  • echimu, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Dam it it really cool :) I can use it my application too
  • Kindred420, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0very cool,dugg
  • rhyno2000, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Very cool... when used judiciously.

    WebKiddies, your internet license will be taken away if you use 3 or more mooFX on your site.

    Dugg.
  • lostboy, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0this is an excellent lightweight effects library which I myself will use. definate +digg
  • dvd14, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Niiice. Dugg.
  • andyd273, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0awesome... I'm going to put these to work
    dugg
  • Blizaine, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0nice.... dugg
  • outerspaceapple, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0i was able to break it.
  • jkearney, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0omglollers
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+0eye candy effects. Nothing really useful here. No digg.

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...

© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.