What is Digg?Sponsored by newegg
Ready. Set. Shop view!
newegg.com - Newegg.com Black Friday Sale starting 11/25 3PM PST. No Lines, No Crowds, Click and Save.
94 Comments
- NewChar, on 10/10/2007, -2/+145Fool proof?
- OBKenobi, on 10/10/2007, -6/+66How To Spell Check Your Digg Stories.
- mmalone, on 10/10/2007, -6/+39He's Russian, give him a break.
BTW, editable title/description on Digg FTW. - l3omb, on 10/10/2007, -6/+23When I read the title, I thought I was going to find a way to fully optimize my Counter Strike Source settings.
- relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -3/+18how do i fullproofed css
- ayeroxor, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17In Soviet Russia, internet ruins YOU
- iashraf, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12You don't need to capitalize the first letter of each word!
- dimitry, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12Whoops, my Russianess kicked in again. Pardon the typo.
@Antonian: No, it's a web service so it has no access to your hard drive. - withincontext, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8Those selectors are obviously for errors. If there are no errors on the page, then those selectors aren't being used. It's working as-designed.
- innominate, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7is this like 'french' benefits?
- spyrochaete, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6Exceptionally well stated. Here's your second paragraph translated and re-translated at http://translation2.paralink.com/
If you have the second language, you should try this realization: not observing process, ask, that someone has written a phrase in English and operated it through utility of machine translation (as Google or Babelfish) to translate it on your second language. Then the person should cipher a few some of words. Double some letters, remove letters, public changes to various, switch places of letters. Then see as you can well read through that it speaks. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9no excuses
- crisrose, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9FOOL!!
- CraigJ, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6this is not fool proofing. this just tells you what CSS selectors you have defined but not used. Useful, but not as advertised...
- hudson99, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Shut up, you're just being fullish
- parax, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6It's because there are people who don't have English as their first language that spelling and grammar are so important. People with English as a second or third language have a difficult enough time translating things that are spelled correctly, translating misspelled words can be an insurmountable task. Misspelled word don't translate through computer translation tools either.
If you have a second language, you should try this exercise: Without observing the process, ask someone to write a phrase in English and run it through an automatic translation utility (like Google or Babelfish) to translate it to your second language. Then the person should slightly scramble some of the words. Double some letters, remove letters, change vowels to different ones, switch the places of letters. Then see how well you can read what it says. - BlackAle, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7Duh, not everyone uses English / American as their native language.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5So that means we can't correct him? How's he ever going to learn then?
- edwardbc, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Really cool! I just opened it and is already giving me results without giving it a url to check!......
...
oh wait...
NoMethodError in Tasks#index
Showing app/views/tasks/_form.rhtml where line #10 raised:
You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!
The error occurred while evaluating nil.pages - tdous, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Don't get carried away. We'll take the US back one day ;)
- infovore, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Hello, I'm Tom. I wrote the original script the webservice based upon. The script is command-line based, which makes it (in many ways) a lot more useful, but perhaps a bit less friendly for beginners.
Anyhow, if you're interested in running this locally (where it's much faster), check out:
http://infovore.org/archives/2007/07/06/the-css-redundancy-checker/
and the relevant Google Code site, which you can find here:
http://code.google.com/p/css-redundancy-checker/
And get in touch / log issues if you find bugs with it. I'm using it with some colleagues at the moment and it works pretty well for us - if you read the documentation right :) - mmalone, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Not yet, might add that as a feature (an upload option). Also thinking about making a sitemap parser... Check out http://immike.net/blog/2007/07/24/css-redundancy-checker/ for more info, or http://infovore.org/archives/2007/07/06/the-css-redundancy-checker/ for a package that will check files on a local drive (ruby required).
- snoox, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4my css' will never be full now
- goaliegirl, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4As opposed to emptyproof?
- btucker, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3gack, a production rails app running in the development environment. The horrors.
- davecor, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Thank you! Sometime in the '80s we went from NOT being able to care less, to being able to care less.
Good luck trying to explain the difference to the young whippersnappers these days. - darkhero, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Tool stopped working. ***** diggers.
- manitoba98xp, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Someone should double-check their Rails code...(and it shouldn't be running in development...public users shouldn't see stack traces...)
Here's a hint: @task is returning nil, so either you have a bug in your code, or the database is not functioning. - dogstylee, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4Full proof.... almost as nonsensical as "I could care less"...
- mmalone, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Just a little bug... should work now if you try again.
- brownspank, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2He's being optimistic.
- bpapa, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Did you look at the tool? Doing it your way would be retarded.
- NoNamesLeft, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2These are legitimate unused CSS selectors, there is no error there.
Hang your head in shame. - NoNamesLeft, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2"Unused CSS Selectors (6):"
Damn, I wanted to break the tubes with unnecessary coding... mission failure - jandeloo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Wear kevlar.
- Dojikami, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It works now with https. Cool page.
- mrkmrk, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Aww, now we feel bad :(.
- MichelangeloPM, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2This is full of fools
- Antonian, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4Can it check files on a local drive?
- apotropaic, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2This is awesome... if you could, make it crawl the site! Thats would make it a lot better and easier to use :)
- toggo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1What could be stronger that full proof? Mine's a double!
- bmcnitt, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Step 1. http://services.immike.net/css-checker/stylesheets/scaffold.css
Step 2. http://services.immike.net/css-checker/
Step 3. Unused CSS Selectors (20). - jzahra, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2You might want to look into fool proofing your rails code / database.
- rickcarson, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2It is saying that technically it would be possible to care less than they do now, but since that would require effort, they can't be bothered.
So their marginal utility of not caring has diminished to below 0 thereby trying to lower it any further would fail the cost/benefit analysis. - bmcnitt, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Step 1. http://services.immike.net/css-checker/stylesheets/scaffold.css
Step 2. http://services.immike.net/css-checker/
Step 3: Unused CSS Selectors (20). - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There's nothing about getting headshots or owning newbs. Lame
- svivian, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1First we need to get them to write "lose" instead of "loose".
- bpapa, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1If you have a CSS file with a lot of rules and change your site around, you might forget to remove unused CSS rules. That's where this tool comes in.
- infovore, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Yes, do check out http://infovore.org/archives/2007/07/06/the-css-redundancy-checker/ , given that's the source code that Mike based his web version on.
- tungsai, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1FRENCH benefits!?! LOL THat's awesome.
-
Show 51 - 95 of 95 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is