What is Digg?23 Comments
- lux55, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Wouldn't the following be better written using just a class or id, and storing all that style info in CSS? For something discussing design patterns of developing in Javascript, I think something like this is a bit of an important oversight.
div.style.position = “absolute”;
div.style.top = “50%”;
div.style.left = “50%”;
div.style.width = “200px”;
div.style.margin = “-12px 0 0 -100px”;
div.style.border = “0px”;
div.style.padding = “20px”;
div.style.opacity = “0.85″;
div.style.backgroundColor = “#353555″;
div.style.border = “1px solid #CFCFFF”;
div.style.color = “#CFCFFF”;
div.style.fontSize = “25px”;
div.style.textAlign = “center”; - Xell, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Nicely written story with tons of info for the average techie interested in ... hello? digg was once about tech stuff, remember?
I like it. Dugg! - Thierry, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Interesting, dugg.
Too bad some people are stupid enough to think blog==spam. I've seen dugg web sites with way less informations than this blog article. - DannoHung, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1It's not a bad article, but I think calling what the author presents as design patterns might be a little misleading.
I was expecting something a little more high level, like about structuring your JavaScript/Server Side code to make more clean and efficient use of XMLHTTPRequest capabilities. - ezkiel, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0a blog with content!
digg+f-ing+ - SeVeNish, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Intresting en enlightning, good to see an usefull quality article about ajax
- Phragm3nt, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0and this has what to do with design patterns?
- persaltier, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0no digg.
nice code.
badly misleading though. - splatter, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I'm with persaltier on this. Horribly misleading title. No digg. Tho kudos are in order for not mentioning "Web 2.0."
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I admit that the title may not be the best but WikiPedia says the following on the subject of Design Patterns:
In software engineering, a design pattern is a general repeatable solution to a commonly-occurring problem in software design.
Since I'm showing an approach to a problem that may be used, with small changes, to solve an entire class of problems, I think "Design Patterns" is a word that can be used for this :-)
As for the people complaining that the tutorial is not finished: The purpose of this part was to show an overall structure and to implement a small example. The example can be extended and this is exactly what I'll do in the next parts.
Greets,
Snyke - james.britt, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0" ... and we have to start talking about a more Event Driven architecture, or MVC-Model if you prefer."
Well, which is it? They're not the same thing. Not a good start for a tech article.
And ditto what KamikazeH20mln said.. Many people are using the term 'pattern' when they are describing a code cookbook entry. - richardtallent, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1*Real* AJAX/DHTML design patterns: www.ajaxpatterns.org
- KamikazeH20mln, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I can't stand these damn AJAX tutorials that only give you *one* step into the coding...and then say "more later!" Stop digging crap like this. Digg it if its a COMPLETE tutorial, not just the beginning.
- landlord, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0A lot of good information! Dugg!
---------------------------------------
John - http://www.TopGarageBands.com - BlindIrishman, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1AJAX Sack Taps your mom
- tsangal, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Misleading title. No digg.
- wyattearp, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0The code monkey gives you a digg
- landincoldfire, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0yet another dead link
- humblemagii, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0Marked this as spam it's a blog and contains no news or useful information.
Please stop posting crap - humblemagii, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0Please report this as spam people keep posting their own blogs which is just useless trash of the internet. Post this crap on a forum anything but a site like this.
Hint: you suck
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is