What is Digg?71 Comments
- sharpfork, on 11/05/2007, -1/+91Bush apologists- spare us the ad hominem attacks on thinkprogress and unrelated "but Clinton did it" crap and explain why your boy w should be allowed to get away with this.
W can bitch and bitch about investigations by the Democrats; but, it's crap like this that shows he has stuff to hide. - hawkeye17, on 11/05/2007, -1/+63Someday this stuff will all come out and history will NOT be kind to Bush. Enjoy the 'legacy' Dumbya.
- IrishJoe, on 11/01/2007, -0/+51Remember how when this Abramoff news started Bush said he hardly knew him, and didn't remember him, and that his administration had limited contact with him. 600 pages of documents that they refuse to turn over later it looks like those were another series of Bush lies.
- shawnfassett, on 11/01/2007, -0/+37If you've got nothing to hide....isn't that the defense people use when they give up their rights?? What does Bush have to hide?
- SeethisPass, on 11/01/2007, -1/+26Insane criminal in chief, When did we vote for one of those? His arrest is the only justice possible.
- Frei, on 11/08/2007, -1/+23There is so much ***** coming out of this administration it's getting hard to keep track.
- pintomp3, on 11/02/2007, -1/+22reagan was a racist who supported white aparthied south africa and opposed martin luther king day. he ran up the national debt and took more vacation days than any previous president. he took partisan politics to a new level with his commandment "though shall not speak ill of a fellow republican". he delayed the freeing of hostages to coincide with his inauguration. he loosened regulation paving the way for the corporate media/propoganda outlets to take over. he sold arms to iran in order to fund the contras. he may not be as bad bush, but he wasn't much better.
- pintomp3, on 11/05/2007, -5/+26don't be too sure about that, history has been rewritten to paint reagan in a positive light.
- obliviousfool, on 11/01/2007, -0/+18http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/artic ...
There was a case in Guam against Abramoff which never went forward because Bush removed the federal prosecutor. This prosecutor was replaced by one who was handpicked by the Republican Party (and Karl Rove himself) who could not prosecute the case because he was related to one of the defendants. In other words, Abramoff has been involved in stuff that Bush really doesn't want people to know about. - inactive, on 11/01/2007, -2/+18When will the other two branches of government or federal judges arrest these people and their staff? "But my boss asked me break the law" is no excuse for criminal behavior. Bush can't protect them for much longer. Many will go to jail.
- obliviousfool, on 11/01/2007, -0/+13...getting? This BS has been hard to track for years now! You'd have to make it a full time job to do it properly.
- Frei, on 11/01/2007, -0/+12Maybe we can find some people to track it, we'll hire them from all over the nation and use them as a check to his executive power. Lets call them congressmen, they should be able to do something about this.
Wait...*****. - inactive, on 11/01/2007, -0/+11It's what he doesn't hide that makes people wonder WTF he IS hiding!
- scabbers, on 11/01/2007, -0/+11All politicians do this kind of crap. It needs to stop and especially with Bush. Why? Because he's going to get us all killed / broke.
- inactive, on 11/01/2007, -0/+11Neocons are cowards http://reasontraditionandliberty.blogspot.com/2007 ...
- inactive, on 11/01/2007, -0/+10The next administration is going to have to appoint a staff, most likely creating a new department just to sort it out.
- sensoukami, on 11/02/2007, -0/+9Conservite response to worries about civil liberties and domestic spying -> "If you're innocent you have nothign to hide"
Funny how that doesn't apply to this governments insane level of secrecy. How quickly people change their tune... - paganmonkeyboy, on 11/01/2007, -0/+7Dr Mr President
Why does it look like you and your administration are CROOKS ?
Thank You,
Concerned Taxpayer - kholburn, on 11/01/2007, -0/+7I'll raise you: more crap. It's a myth that Reagan defeated the USSR.:
http://www.counterpunch.org/blum06072004.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/opinion/10mann.h ... - scorchedearth, on 11/01/2007, -0/+7Yeah, like hosting Mohammad Atta on his gambling boat prior to 9.11
- azAZ09, on 11/01/2007, -3/+10It interests me that both progressives and conservatives like to talk about the president's ~conviction~. Of course, they are talking about completely different things. One involves sentencing, and the other involves stubbornness.
- BlacklabelSAR, on 11/01/2007, -0/+6Reagan was step 1, W is step 2, both on the same path.
- inactive, on 11/01/2007, -0/+5gw bush is a liar
- azAZ09, on 11/08/2007, -0/+5You're entitled to your emotional response. After all --It is well deserved.
However, hatred can be bad for you physically. And the hatred actually feeds the divisiveness, as well as the essentialist facet of the conservative ideological project--the false argument that a given group of beliefs define a certain group. Remember that those who push political conservatism have also made themselves into victims of their own propaganda. Metaphorically speaking, They are the senior citizens who have fallen for a phone scam, brag about their coming riches, and argue with you about when you try to ease them into the truth. They are so vested in the illusion they have created, they will irrationally fight tooth and nail against anything you say.
Apply pity instead. Those who use differences to build their identity thrive on hate. - BlacklabelSAR, on 11/02/2007, -0/+5p0s3r's resume:
Thinkprogress. Buried as *****. (see comment) 18
Rawstory. Buried as *****. (see comment) 1303
Rawstory. Buried as *****. (see comment)
p0s3r. Buried as troll with nothing intelligent to add and afraid to speak to the issues. - BlacklabelSAR, on 11/01/2007, -0/+4Man you are working extremely hard to find a bright side. Let's focus on the point shall we? That point would be obstruction of justice, and un-precedented corruption in the White House.
- TheLoneHoot, on 11/02/2007, -0/+4Ask the people of Honduras and El Salvador if Reagan initiated any wars or not...
- wendelgee2, on 11/01/2007, -1/+4See also: Hillary's response in the most recent debate regarding releasing archived documents on her time as first lady. (And it was Bill who introduced the FoIA, for chrissake!)
- inactive, on 11/01/2007, -0/+3HAHAHAHA :) thanks for the laugh
- Acewrap, on 11/01/2007, -0/+3The only *legal* justice possible.
- stepnw1f, on 11/02/2007, -0/+3History has been painted by a small minority controlling what Americans see and hear. That's gonna change too.
- TheLoneHoot, on 11/01/2007, -0/+3Damn - you had me right up the RP reference at the bottom there - I won't digg you down but now I have to refrain from digging you up too.
- wakananda, on 11/01/2007, -0/+3On the other hand, neocons have an historical precedent in fascism, and they are building (and profiting from) concentration camps. They are debasing the currency, trampling the Constitution, looting the treasury, putting us in debt to China, brutally suppressing dissent, replacing science with fundamentalist religion in the schools, subverting the media with tax dollars by planting propaganda as "news"... I say we bludgeon them with tire irons, plow them into the soil, and plant hemp. THEN we can pity them.
- obliviousfool, on 11/01/2007, -0/+3It's okay that congress dropped the ball on this one, we have the fine upstanding folks over at the Department of Justice waiting to investigate any accusations of impropriety coming out of the white house. Oh, wait...
- ploop, on 11/01/2007, -0/+2Clever. 8-)
- MonsterChaOS, on 11/01/2007, -0/+2You can't be serious.
My head is damned ready to implode over the fact that people still think that Fox Noise ever presents a "factual" story. - stepnw1f, on 11/02/2007, -0/+2And yet Congress will do nothing..... spare us the strongly worded letters! Remember: "Impeachment is off the table." All the corpocrats have to go! Wake up America.
- Scottamus, on 11/01/2007, -0/+2In other news the white house just received a shipment of 20 industrial shredders.
(/satire) - BlacklabelSAR, on 11/01/2007, -0/+2Let me quote the crooked attorney from the Simpsons: "What _is_"truth, anyway?"
- inactive, on 11/02/2007, -0/+2If each of these people would watch this:
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
they'd realize that this is BS issue meant to divide us and keep the CFR-Bilderberg elites in total domination of us...hillary or Rudy or any of the rest of these criminal is just going to escalate the war on the middle and lower clases.
Ron Paul is our only hope . - kd1s, on 11/01/2007, -0/+2And Bush sits there and castigates Congress for all these oversight hearings. Of course he'd have to being that he and his administration have left a miles wide by miles long trail.
This has to be the most corrupt administration I've ever witnessed and I've lived through Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II. It makes Nixon look like a saint.
I also note they've started to beat about the missing email issue too. But I say they have more than enough evidence now to draw up articles of impeachment.
Of course the remaining Republicans in the house would pretty much have no option to go along, else risk their own political careers. So I wonder whey Pelosi won't do anything. - stepnw1f, on 11/01/2007, -0/+2Sorry... Reagan had as much to do with the USSR folding as you do in molding public opinion.
- TheLoneHoot, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1They're definitely spineless for the most part -Waxman is one exception- but they're not ***quite*** as bad as the hypocritical reich wing republicans.
- Terr01, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1I think you may be ascribing just a bit too much oracular ability to him.
- TheLoneHoot, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1Frei, Oblivious, you guys rock!
- TheLoneHoot, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1Agreed - check his post history - it's FULL of the same copied and pasted lines... I'm guessing he's at least part reichbot.
- clothmonkey, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1Heh, the Department of Holy ***** this is Bad.
- obliviousfool, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1The wiki on Atta cites Sun Cruz employees. I'm not sure who broke the story. I've seen this information in lots of places on the web. I don't know if it ever made the mainstream news. I don't know if Atta's activities on the boat were put in the commission report or not. Of course, quite a lot of stuff didn't make it into that report.
- clothmonkey, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1Sure, just ask Steven Colbert or Jon Stewart.
- clothmonkey, on 11/01/2007, -0/+1Methinks you forgot the /sarcasm tag.
-
Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is