What is Digg?14 Comments
- oceanrain, on 01/10/2008, -1/+4The Bush/Clinton crime family ensuring their lasting dynasty by rigging the machines for the Hildabeast. As long as this dynasty continues, voting has become a waste of time.
- morrislevy, on 01/09/2008, -3/+6This is huge. Front page NOW.
- grunk, on 01/09/2008, -4/+7Obama was polling 8-11% over Hillary, then loses by 3%? You guys better start asking questions. Hillary does lunch with neocon Rupert Murdoch.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/0 ... - WhiteRaven, on 01/10/2008, -0/+2It is perfectly normal for different districts to have different outcomes. If you were to *randomly* separate them into two different groups and evaluate there votes, a difference of 5% would not be unusual. The fact that hand-counting tends to take place in smaller districts provides us with a built-in demographic distinction... smaller communities vs larger. While I will not speculate on the actual reasoning and causes of the distinction, on it's face the fact that those living in larger communities tend to favor one candidate while smaller communities favor another is not merely believable, it's pretty much inevitable.
Okay, I *will* speculate. Hillary's excellent "get out the vote" apparatus is more effective in (or focused on) larger communities. So, it all makes perfect sense. - dukeeeey, on 01/10/2008, -1/+3ron paul got ZERO votes in new hampshire
then a whole load of people turned up and said they had voted for him
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/0 ...
I smell a rat. - Berkana, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1Perhaps you mean Ron Paul got zero votes in some districts? I remember hearing that he got something like 8% as officially reported. Still, something seems suspicious about this whole thing.
- lobster1, on 01/09/2008, -1/+2Wouldn't only the largest municipalities use electronic voting machines?
- Falldog, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1What about the results in Iowa? Were they off too?
- dubbleenerd, on 01/09/2008, -2/+3every single 'parody' poster about Diebold on this page is a winner: http://homepage.mac.com/rcareaga/diebold/adworks.h ...
- chugger1992, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT
- LoriPriceCLG, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1Thank you, morrislevy! --Lori
- inactive, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1what's funny is that pbs, which is not MSM, is not reporting on this at all. if anyone, i thought it would be pbs.
- dukeeeey, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1correction appreciated
yes in some districts he got 0
which is more than suspicious - xoomac, on 01/13/2008, -0/+0Yes...Yes...Yes...A resounding Yes!
You need to find the You Tube videos for Jim Condit Jr. to understand why.
" Votescam Conspiracy Against America (all key elections can be fixed). 98% of all ballots in the USA are counted in secret by a few private mega-companies, with citizens and candidates barred from the count by police guard. -- Yes, this is a conspiracy."
www.realnews247.com
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is