What is Digg?310 Comments
- sockpuppets, on 11/25/2007, -14/+439A pig just flew by my window.
- guestaccount, on 11/25/2007, -13/+302Holy *****.... on Fox News... Can I really only digg this once?
- samcrut, on 11/25/2007, -9/+180No. Actually you can digg it each time it gets dredged up and reposted under a new name. See that (2) up there in the title? Well, I think that's because a few months ago it was posted under the same title, sans the "(2)."
- Remmiz, on 11/25/2007, -2/+161the zoom in on the mouth was very awkward...
- Slade605, on 11/25/2007, -6/+156Think that's odd? I got laid.
- ivanpk, on 11/25/2007, -8/+92This is the result of the two laptops controlling each other on the front page.
- inactive, on 11/25/2007, -18/+99Napolitano should be on the Supreme Court. But I bet you wouldn't like his opinions on abortion, freedom to worship and freedom to bear arms.
- georgemason01, on 11/25/2007, -11/+92e.
- luet, on 11/25/2007, -33/+108This has already been posted. The title of this even has (2) at the end. You don't have to post this over and over again.
- Rikushix, on 11/25/2007, -8/+80The ground feels curiously cold. I think hell just froze over.
- baalzebub, on 11/25/2007, -0/+55The tree of Liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. - Thomas Jefferson
that tree is getting pretty thirsty... - TheEducated, on 11/25/2007, -11/+59The original link to the video is gone.
This is the new one.
"Nation Of Sheep" - Rikkochet, on 11/25/2007, -6/+48I guess all that's left is monkeys flying out of..
OW ***** JESUS - inactive, on 11/25/2007, -4/+46I always enjoy listening to / watching Napolitano. His comments are tightly reasoned and eloquently expressed . . . this is but one example.
- savetheusa1, on 11/25/2007, -23/+64Dup
- Speed, on 11/25/2007, -3/+38Pics or it didn't happen
- romistrub, on 11/25/2007, -5/+38The editing threw me off. Freaked me out for a sec.
- novask, on 11/25/2007, -0/+27Next you'll tell me she was conscious and sober.
- getoffmybridge, on 05/05/2009, -2/+26Yeah uhmm, it was on Fox news. Kinda has like, nothing to do with RP. Great post though.
- pbone, on 11/25/2007, -1/+24it's just a little airborne! it's still good! it's still good!
- jperdomo, on 11/25/2007, -2/+25Fox News or otherwise. This is not a red or blue issue. He is bluntly illustrating just one example of the rights the constitution granted but, we allow the current government to take away. It has to have become pandemic for Fox News to be running the story. Hell if your truly a Republican you should be completely against the Patriot Act and the federal government getting all up in your *****.
- billbillbilly, on 11/25/2007, -1/+22hands dont count
- ekravchenko, on 11/25/2007, -3/+23no, it's just your crappy dial up connection. Get a better provider.
- XercesAD, on 11/25/2007, -4/+22Hmm... Last time i checked this was America. You know... home of the free.... protectors of unalienable rights... What a ridiculous country we live in if all you have to do is get a few people here and a few people there to sign some dotted lines to bypass the rights this country was founded on. Down with Bush!
- seanpetrash, on 11/25/2007, -7/+25yeah, i like the judge. He's for Ron Paul too.
- bobrice830, on 11/25/2007, -0/+18Napolitano is always good, despite being on FOX. Him saying things like this isn't exactly new. His opinions are always well thought out, smart, and he's not afraid to challenge people like John Gibson.
- knightblade2oo4, on 11/25/2007, -0/+17it's just a little airborne, it's still good, it's still good.
- trentasaurus, on 11/25/2007, -3/+19Yeah... conspiracy people are always doing weird awkward ***** like that, but i guess you take you're allies where you can get them.
- Defuser, on 11/25/2007, -3/+19Why do you ask? Is he an immature ***** that thinks everyone in the nation is an Atheist Ron Paul Supporting Mac User?
- DubbedOver, on 11/25/2007, -4/+20And despite this being a duplicate, are our basic human rights not an important enough message to make it to the front page of digg.com?
- LiceHelpDotCom, on 11/25/2007, -2/+17I didn't get a chance to see it the first time. I appreciate the re-post.
I am getting a little tired of people bitching about double posts. Don't click if you have already seen it!
But no, instead, people have to continue to be selfish ("I'VE seen it so now it can go away") or false superiority ("Ha-ha, I'VE seen it so I am so much better than those of you who haven't"; "LOLz Gawd, that is soooo old, I can't believe how superior I am to have seen it and you idiots haven't")
It's like offensive stuff on TV: If you don't like it, DON'T LOOK! - Witchboy, on 11/25/2007, -2/+17Wow, even Fox News is getting wise to the horrible abuses of government occuring right now...
Everyone should read the End of America. Everyone. I just started reading it, after watching an interview with Wolfe. It's amazing. First off, it shows was an electrifying, radical group the Founding Fathers were. Second, it shows how amazing our system has been to date. However, it also shows how a couple of radical things have changed, for the first time in US history, and are undermining the Constitution. This book is short, exciting and well thought out. It lists the ten steps by which dictators assume control, then it shows how they're quickly moving along in America. My highest recommendation goes to this book. - romistrub, on 11/25/2007, -11/+26You just made me wonder if the Bush administration is much more ingenious than I expected. Perhaps they are establishing a state of affairs that is absolutely unacceptable to the American public in an effort to create a "lesser of two evils" situation, in which they can redact their aggressive totalitarian tactics and substitute them for a more friendly agenda, laden with ultraconservative stances on religion/abortion/etc.. Ingenious indeed.
- inactive, on 11/25/2007, -2/+15Napolitano has been mentioned as a possible VP candidate for Ron Paul. I'd rather see him on the Supreme Court, though.
- SpamDog, on 11/25/2007, -8/+21DUGG (again), Sometimes things need to be Dugg AGAIN to reiterate the point!
- dagnome1984, on 11/25/2007, -0/+13What are they?
Do tell. - pkonink, on 11/25/2007, -5/+18I can confirm it did freeze. I recently registered as a republican for our state's primary race.
- bigt8dogg, on 11/26/2007, -0/+12But the original video was taken down... so, that link no longer worked. It's good that people get to see this.
- goldpress, on 11/26/2007, -2/+13I can stand a few opinions that go against my way of thinking. I have a much harder time accepting people that won't uphold the Constitution they swore to protect!
I've read some that Napolitano supports Ron Paul. Let me just say this: Paul -Pres/Napolitano -VP! :) We need a duo that might be somewhat responsible in their actions. - yogione, on 11/25/2007, -6/+17OK, folks - here's the logic. I have seen this with my hometown metro newspaper. They are staunch supporters of GOP tickets because they have the belief that the GOP is "better for business." This simple judgment clouds their political minds over, every time, no exceptions. So why do they print or show the occasional dissenter?
1. Obviously so they can say - "see- fair and balanced - there's the one dissenter allowed this month!"
2. Murdoch, like Hearst, is in a business where he NEEDS anonymous sources, where he needs to be able to print or broadcast whatever material serves his purposes, whenever he wants. People like Murdoch and Hearst have secrets that they don't want ANYBODY, not even the Feds, to have access to.
3. So you have the situation in which the the big networks and newspapers want to be able to say or print whatever they want, and they want to be able to dig up information when it helps them make money, er, headline news.
4. At the same time, they want to keep the GOP in power so they keep getting pro-corporate, anti-worker laws passed, and are let off the hook when found to be violating citizen's rights, censoring the news, or otherwise falling down on their responsibilities to the citizens.
So it's a message from Murdoch to Cheney: "I'm on your side, but I have certain stakes in this too." - allan17, on 11/25/2007, -1/+11Maybe everyone didn't get a chance to see it. I'm sorry we upset the dupe Nazis.
- ShawnHunt, on 11/25/2007, -3/+13Oh, if only!
- LiceHelpDotCom, on 11/25/2007, -2/+12I didn't get a chance to see it the first time. I appreciate the re-post.
I am getting a little tired of people bitching about double posts. Don't click if you already have seen it!
But no, instead, people have to continue to be selfish ("I'VE seen it so now it can go away") or false superiority ("Ha-ha, I'VE seen it so I am so much better than those of you who haven't"; "LOLz Gawd, that is soooo old, I can't believe how superior I am to have seen it and you idiots haven't")
It's like offensive stuff on TV: If you don't like it, DON'T LOOK! - getoffmybridge, on 05/05/2009, -0/+10Yeah I did, but the video itself is not spam.
You don't have to be a Ron Paul supporter to have serious issues with the Patriot Act.
Amazing indeed.... - Konstantino, on 11/25/2007, -1/+10Hey, the more people that see this the better. It was a few weeks ago, so it's no big.
- sjl127, on 11/25/2007, -4/+13This is just making it to digg now? It's a great book - read it.
- EvaMonkey01, on 11/25/2007, -1/+10So the people who missed them the first time can hear them.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 304 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is