What is Digg?20 Comments
- GlobalistShill, on 10/31/2008, -0/+38This is an excellent documentary that helps to explain part of the reason why America has become as utterly f*cked up as it currently is.
Although I would say that FOX News is the most blatant example, ALL of the "mainstream" media news sources are being manipulated at the top by a tiny handful of ultra-wealthy elite with a self-centered agenda.
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master." - Pravil Lal - inactive, on 10/31/2008, -0/+37This is what happens when you let someone/a corporation have so much control over what a population watches. We'd make the nazis proud.
- Catspaw, on 10/31/2008, -0/+27That is a very good documentary. There is so much propaganda emanating from Fox and the other main channels that it is easy to get the feeling we are living in a war zone and being treated like an enemy. Also, it appears these stations don't appear to give a damn about losing their reputations in pumping out ***** - it therefore appears that this is part of an endgame.
Orwell Rolls In His Grave is another documentary which deals with this issue:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1925114769 ... - GovernmentSp00k, on 10/31/2008, -1/+24TV is largely controlled by 6 corporations. It exists for the advertising. To insure you remain a spend-frenzied consumer, not a citizen. To sell you an 'image', a lifestyle and more useless trinkets you don't need. I don't believe anything they tell me on Illuminati state TV, much less their papers. It pays to always remember that if and when you are watching TV that 99.99% of everything you see/hear is nothing but overt government propaganda, playin' your mind and conscience. The markets are being played by the bankers. It doesn't matter who we vote for. They don't follow the Constitution anyway.
Americans are TV hypnotized, drugged up, dumbed down and so utterly dependent that in general they are incapable of critical thought and are disinterested in discovering how the media is adversely affecting their lives. America turn off the *****' TV and the controlled "news.".. - UselessTrivia, on 10/31/2008, -1/+17The good news here is that it's pretty easy to just not watch Fox News.
People watch the news they agree with these days. It's lame, but at least there's players on both sides of the fence. Checks and balances so to speak. - JenniferInMO, on 11/01/2008, -0/+13I am glad to see this online. If you haven't seen this yet, you are wayyy behind the times. This is a MUST WATCH movie!
- Catspaw, on 10/31/2008, -0/+10I think it exists for more than advertising. It exists to misinform, mislead and dumb down. The people are the target of an infowar and Fox is being used as a weapon.
- col381, on 11/01/2008, -0/+9Any "News" channel that repeatedly must remind it's viewers every 5 minutes or so how "Fair & Balanced" it is should immediately ring alarm bells in the mind of any rational person. The very notion of "Fox News" is an Oxymoron, this is nothing but a propganda delivery system pure and simple.
The very BEST thing anyone could ever do for this country, would be to break up these large corporations so that they do not have so much power over us in order to shape our opinions - How many people do you know didn't vote for Gore because he was a quote "Flip Flopper" - and how many of you would have even thought of this if not for the co-ordinated and relentless campaign by the Corporate MSM to push this image into your head?
1. Break up the media, one company/owner = one media outlet, be it print, TV or whatever.
2. Editorial control should be placed into the hands of the inidividual Journalists, not Station Editors, and certainly not the corporations that own the stations/newspapers/etc. - inactive, on 11/01/2008, -0/+8It's not just Fox. The 2 parties are actively engaged in controlling Presidential politics through the media. The prime example is the Presidential Debates which are now controlled by the 2 parties themselves.
In 1988, the League of Women Voters released this statement: [We are] withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter... The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/In_1988_Women_Vo ...
Please digg. - GovernmentSp00k, on 10/31/2008, -1/+9Great quote.. *ALL* is right.
- wherearemymeds, on 10/31/2008, -0/+7No, they don't give a damn. Only when the money stops rolling in, will they give a damn.
- plumcider, on 11/01/2008, -0/+7Kill the media giants--support bloggers.
- mozarker, on 11/02/2008, -0/+6The mainstream media are not news organizations, they are paid lobbyists. That explains why they and our government are so scr**** up. Lobbyists write our laws and hand them to the House and Senate members with expectations of their being passed. The MSM is simply the PR lobbyist branch used to explain to us why these laws are going to be sooooo good for us.
- neurobox, on 10/31/2008, -0/+6Indeed. Now that we see it, watch for a false-flag event to play out "Corruption in the Press?!" Somebody gets fired, and the public goes "there that's handled," and in doing so prevents further discussion.
- mistertrogdor, on 11/01/2008, -1/+6SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUT UP!
LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS!
"Illuminated Journalism"?
http://i38.tinypic.com/2dua3ux.jpg - Stonecutters' Sacred Parchmant
http://www.vyzygoth.com/simpson.jpg Wat, coincidence. Paranoid much?
Some people say some of Fox's products have some interestingly coincidental things in it...
Some people say the Simpson's Movie's eerie plot of the government trying to kill everyone in a bubble pushes the envelope.
The fact is the Simpson's is an example of what American Family should be like.
Full of strange stories, sometimes involving the imminent tragic devastation resulting of the corrupt decisions of a construction site manager to embezzle funds by building a sub-prime dam made to fail, Or maybe an evil cult leader, wanting to steal your money, or the evil Globex Corporation bent on taking over the world?
Fair and Balanced analysis of Fox and it's affiliates.
"The family is relieved that they are able to think for themselves again. Suddenly, the Fox logo appears on their television with an announcer stating, "you are watching Fox." The family repeats, "We are watching Fox." (simultaneous mono-tonal droning) - Catspaw, on 10/31/2008, -0/+4I think the corruption is too widespread for them to pull that one. I think the public realizes that just about the whole mainstream media system is rotten to the core. One person being fired would be as effective as moving one deck chair on the Titanic.
- UselessTrivia, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1First of all...there was no such thing as Liberal Media until Fox News came along and created a market for it by introducing Conservative Media.
Secondly, Rupert Murdock and NewsCorp own more combined media than the "five corporate Judeo-liberal news networks" that you mention put together.
Third...do you know where I can get a tinfoil hat? I'm afraid the jews are trying to read my mind. - Catspaw, on 11/02/2008, -0/+1 This is not about money - watch 'Endgame' at Google Video.
- BrendanSheehan, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1Both sides, I know what you mean. But I think the point is no one in the media is on the side of the people - only caring about the facts and not the "entertainment factor". The BBC news in the UK is way more democratic, and better. Some of the documentaries on channel 4, even better.
- inactive, on 11/01/2008, -1/+1UT: There are five corporate Judeo-liberal news networks, and one corporate Judeo-imperialist network. While I agree that competition creates a little bit of balance, the news is still being shaped from a minority elitist agenda. FNC isn't as biased against conservatives/straights/whites/Christians as the others, but FNC is adamant about trumpeting the war horn in order to send young American men to their deaths for a Jewish takeover of the Arab oil-producing states. That doesn't imply real respect for viewers or diversity of viewpoints. It's not a real choice. This lack of choice and representative viewpoints, as well as a yearning for the truth, is what is driving millions of Americans to the internet to read articles from news outlets around the world.
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
