What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
109 Comments
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -12/+98 The War on Terror is plainly the War on America's liberties. Anyone who endorses it is ignorant or is an enemy of the American republic.
- cjdunn, on 10/12/2007, -14/+80That man is hopelessly addicted to Iraq.
- jamie1415, on 10/12/2007, -10/+55It makes you wonder how some people can sit and believe what he is saying. Seriously, how long does he think he can pull the 9/11 thing...?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -13/+52Your chances of being murdered in Washington D.C. are higher than being killed by a terrorist: http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm
So are your chances of being killed by cancer, a drunk driver, or second-hand cigarette smoke. The list goes on and on. - mikeyeah, on 10/12/2007, -1/+36Every Bush Speech...
Iraq...freedom...9/11...terror...freedom...terrorist...9/11
My personal message to Bush...
You are a criminal. You are a every rich man's hero, and every average man's worst enemy. You are a disgrace to this country and the Constitution it was founded on. Not only should you be impeached, you should be imprisoned. Karma's a bitch, it owes you big time. - DOCKAUF55, on 10/12/2007, -5/+40And he says it all with that dumbass smile on his face
- themanmachine, on 10/12/2007, -10/+44What the ***** is up with his smirk? He says, "Enemies that could just as easily come here to kill us" at the end then shows off that impish little smirk of his.
- marmanukem, on 10/12/2007, -3/+32So why the ***** are we in Iraq?
Why does he continue to link Iraq to 9/11?
Because he is dishonest and a fear-monger. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -7/+35why would "terrorists" wait to come to America until after the troops left?
wouldn't a smart "terrorist" come here and start hitting "soft targets"
instead of the suicide mission that is trying to fight the vastly superior US military?
think about it - chase001, on 10/12/2007, -4/+30NEWS FLASH: Bin Laden is not in Iraq and never has been despite what Fox "News" tells you. Getting behind his invasion and occupation of that country would do nothing to stop the people that attacked us on 9/11. Perhaps if we had invaded Bush's bosses in Saudi Arabia it might have since most of the highjackers came from there.
- buster99, on 10/12/2007, -9/+30Every time I see little kids on TV talking about their parents serving in Iraq I think of those bastards Cheney and Rumsfeld. Very sad. They hijacked the system.
- forumgirl, on 10/12/2007, -4/+24@ o0lllll0o
Didn't you get the memo?
No one has cared what people like you think for quite a while now. You've been wrong so consistently and for so long that your opinions are no longer part of the public discourse. - MCMookie, on 10/12/2007, -6/+22My buddy is 22 and in the service. I called him yesterday to congratulate him on his wife having a baby. He ships out to Iraq TOMORROW.
What. The. *****. - deesnutz, on 10/12/2007, -1/+16Well someone has to keep this ***** war going. How else can the war profiteers like Haliburton, United Defense, DynCorp, and the long list of others are going to make a profit? Come on, did you really think this is about "security" and Al Qaeda? This is about the bottom line and with out George W. Bush, the companies mentioned above won't have much of one.
Think about it, on Sept. 11, 2001 we were attacked by 19 men with box cutters. An operation that most likely cost at the most 1 million dollars to achieve. We are spending over $11 million every hour in Iraq & Afghanistan. We have killed more American soldiers during this war than died on Sept. 11th. And continue to kill & debilitate more on a daily basis. The Taliban has regrouped. Bin Laden is still alive. Al Qaeda still exists. And all this after 4 years.
And who has gained from all this? The war profiteers and the oil companies, who used this as an excuse to increase their profits. So again, this isn't about terror, security or defense. It's about pure profits. "The wolf has been in the hen house" since George W. Bush too office. - p0tent1al, on 10/12/2007, -3/+18This is just sickening.
I want to see the response from the people that actually agree with this man's way of thinking, or think that people are exaggerating the situation at hand (or I want to see the faces of the people who say this is just all propaganda *cough*geekee*cough*) when the President of the United States turns into the "King" of the United States.
Then what will you stupid ***** say then. - CogitatorX, on 10/12/2007, -2/+16Did anyone catch "America at a Crossroads" on PBS yesterday? bin Laden has made it perfectly clear for about a decade now that Al Qaeda wanted to provoke America into a "cowboy response" and bog the USA down in a war of attrition in either Iraq, Afghanistan or Somalia. He's smarter than our leadership and knew Bush and the Chickenhawk administration could easily be baited. His plan is to bankrupt the USA as he did the USSR and it's working.
How nice of Great Leader Bush to accommodate the terrorists and play the game the way they want it played. - therealrico, on 10/12/2007, -2/+16God I hate Bush with every inch of my body. I am so embarrassed as an American knowing he represents our country, at least when I talk to some one from another country I can immediately find something in common with them when I mention how much I hate my president.
- Dumbledorito, on 10/12/2007, -0/+12News flash: Opposition to Bush, his policies, and the war ARE the current mainstream. Public opinion has abandoned him, over 70% of voters disapprove of him, so enough with the "lib'rulls are just against Dubya" stuff. Wake up.
- yumyym, on 10/12/2007, -8/+18this makes me sick.
i certainly hope that people didn't stand up and applause during his speech. - fuzzmeister, on 10/12/2007, -8/+18Don't feed the trolls...
- InetRoadkill, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9That grin is what got him the title "The Smirking Chimp".
FYI:: You can easily tell when Bush is telling a whopper of a lie; He start signals it with that *****-eating smirk. He'll often hunch over onto the podium with one arm across the top supporting his weight and that's when the smirk goes into overdrive and the lies get really thick and heavy. The smirk basically says "Yeah, I'm lying my ass off and you can't do a ***** thing about it!"
The other signal which can be used to tell when he's lying (besides his lips moving) is when he opens a paragraph with "Some people say..." or a variation to that effect. This is when the mega straw man of Bush's imagination gets put into play who is then valiantly defeated by whatever line of ***** he's trying promote.
Watch some of his old press conferences and see for yourself. - ruminate, on 10/12/2007, -15/+24A well as oil and money, and don't forget the sanctity of life. Our fearless leader is is an idiot.
- geoboy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9You forget that digg is not purely a site with American users. There are many people on digg from all across the globe, and there are plenty of people in the rest of the world who absolutely hate Bush and his foreign policies... probably moreso than the average American. Why should it come as a surprise, then, that websites with global access often have communities which show a hatred/opposition to Bush?
- dwxpub, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9@doom777
Or maybe, their first priority will be to keep the devil in their land for as long as possible, driving up resentment in both Iraq and many other places in the Middle East? With the added bonus of creating many, many angry young men who blame the US for what happened to their country? And since those young men may never have witnessed Sadaam's atrocities, they won't clearly see what their other option was?
So many questions. If only the president could answer *some* of those. - overtoke, on 10/12/2007, -3/+11What needs to be said cannot be legally said by me.
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10Bush has earned an execution time and time again.
Why is this monster making policy for America? He's a traitor on so many levels.
Granted, he's got many sphincter-lampreys to cover his ass, but they're generally weak both mentally and spiritually.
Death to traitors! Death to Bush! - Fieri, on 10/12/2007, -8/+15Speed of diggs is what determines front-paging, not number.
And Digg is still very left-wing overall, but it's improving as it becomes mainstreamed. - monkeyrun, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Sad ... fear's probably Bush's only ally right now.
- Shaman760, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Tell you what- get out of iraq, give us back our guns, and let Americans take care of our own because it's been proven time and again that the government can't and won't.
- Influsion, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Your buddy shouldn't have joined the military knowing Bush was commander-in-chief.
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8gerbil,
Most of the world hates the Bush administration for reasons that someone of your miserable quality could never appreciate.
Kill yourself. Painfully. - overtoke, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6as if there are articles that make bush look good
- InetRoadkill, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6It's been his only ally for a long time now.
- Dumbledorito, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6@geekee: How does that change the content of his speech?
- HunterTV, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7Yeah and the way he sways back and forth from one side of the podium to the other. Is he on springs or what?
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -4/+10Screw you, idiot. Your craven diaper-filling is what is wrong with America.
- dwxpub, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7Blogspam no - wrong topic (political opinion) maybe, but spam is pushing it.
Next time, just say that you're in disagreement that Bush is fear mongering, instead of making things up. - InetRoadkill, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5I don't think it was a trap so much as it was symbiosis. Bush needs terrorism to promote his Orwellian agenda and the turr'ists need Bush to inflame the Muslim world thus providing a source of hatred, money, and recruits.
- Drakkor, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Psychopathic personalities, or “PPs.”
What has allowed so many PPs to rise so high in corporations, and now in government, is that they are so decisive. Unlike normal people, they are never filled with doubts, for the simple reason that they cannot care what happens next. Simply can’t. Do this! Do that! Mobilize the reserves! Privatize the public schools! Attack Iraq! Cut health care! Tap everybody’s telephone! Cut taxes on the rich! Build a trillion-dollar missile shield! ***** /habeas corpus/ and the Sierra Club and /In These Times,/ and kiss my ass! Bush should be in a rubber room !!
Kurt Vonnegut 2003 - dftpnkezln, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Sorry, al-Qaeda sympathisers and Iran? I think you've got your enemies mixed up. They're about as likely to cooperate with one another as the Israelis with the Palestinians. A very strong part of al-Qaeda ideology is hatred for Shiites, particularly those of a Persian bent. If you don't grasp this basic fact, then you come off sounding like you're the one who doesn't understand geopolitics.
The Iranian brand of 'terrorism' does not trend towards anti-western attacks like al Qaeda (who obviously do), but towards liberationist movements in the middle-east (Hezbollah, the Mahdi army) with Shiite leanings. There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Iran would try or even desire attacks in Western countries.
I'll tell you whats really strengthening radicals and terrorist groups right now - the ability to point to the great big western occupation in the middle of the region and say "see, we're right".
As for withdrawal and the ensuing chaos, its going to happen whether we do it now or do it in 2 years. The only difference is how many US and Coalition fatalities you're prepared to sacrifice to sustain the (increasingly laughable) argument that we still have a chance of 'winning'. - hcl40u, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6Yup his plan of bankrupting America appears to be going quite well. I wonder how much money we are wasting in this war and add to the fact that we appear to be willing to go at it again with another war against Iran.
- cmost, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7Bush and his "axis of evil" administration of corrupted fat asses just need to shut the hell up already. They've already screwed up our economy, our lives, and our civil rights; all in the name of lies. Not to mention what they've done to tarnish the United States' reputation globally. I sincerely hope Bush drops dead.
- FromACanteen, on 10/12/2007, -6/+11Pretty ***** to say this stuff after the VT massacre. “death and destruction…here in America.” Very convenient.
- Influsion, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5@marmanuken
Actually, terrormonger is a better term than fearmonger when applied to the president and neocons - andrewgreve, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5"It's us or them." He isn't lying. He is threatening us.
- icewater, on 10/12/2007, -3/+8I'm so glad people are starting to realize how bad Bush and his administration are for everyone. He's making history all right, the very worst kind.
- tilroh, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4I'm an american living overseas and am very glad that people in the US are finally catching on to what the rest of the world has known for a long time.
- AhmedB, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4dwxpub, very well put logical conclusion, this is really what they're not aware of (or maybe aware of and ignoring) if 17 or so did the 9/11, this war is putting hatred into the hearts of millions. I've said it before, if Iraqis are killing each other and American soldiers every day, get the troops out and leave them to kill each other (yes there will be a 'power' vacuum but they are fighting anyway even with power there!)
- carpespasm, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5when they were allowed to run unchecked for over a DECADE. it hit the news that france warned us about exactly what happened on 9/11 months ahead of time with a report that had bin-laden's plan set out in a "transparent" way. the response from the US intelligence agency when asked about the infromation "we do not recall".
- pyrolizard, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5I just wish someone would explain to me... how will we be successful in Iraq? What has to be done to go home? Shouldn't our goal be to end the civil war? If so which side are we fighting for? Who among the Iraqi's are we fighting against?
All the Iraqi soldiers are dead. The only ones left are those who picked up the guns that fell from their dead family, and neighbor's hands. They are the ones that have suffered loss. Shouldn't we be fighting for them? Ooh, right. We're fighting against them. -
Show 51 - 100 of 109 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is