What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Check out new footage. view!
DragonAge.BioWare.com - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
581 Comments
- duggtodeath, on 04/26/2008, -31/+393Here we ***** go. Another war that will waste time, money, effort and lives. ***** the neocons.
- Stryder81, on 04/26/2008, -18/+165If this does go through, people need to stop digging and posting and reading and get the f- up and do something. This has gone too far, these sob's want a WW3.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XQan1qo8T4 - Adamande, on 04/26/2008, -12/+148I don't see how your economy can take another war without collapsing completely. Attacking Iran, would in my opinion also include destroying the US.
- Kazaki, on 04/26/2008, -13/+109IRAN HASN'T DONE ***** TO US
- inactive, on 04/26/2008, -7/+82Good point, could you please send a memo to that effect to:
Occupant
1600 Pennsylannia Ave.
Washington, DC 20500 - AlwaysAwake, on 04/26/2008, -21/+96With his surrogate John Dubya2 McCain likely to fail at the polls, His Majesty, the not-lame-duck has his minions paving the way for his emergency seizure of the government for "national security" reasons/
- The3rdjj, on 04/26/2008, -7/+81I think Canada is gonna have an immigration problem soon
- Look4Truth, on 04/26/2008, -13/+70It's just a matter of time before the global lunatics kick off WW3.
- inactive, on 04/26/2008, -6/+61In other news, oil surges $350/barrel and the Bush and Cheney family fortune increases by $50 billion a second.
- NATED066, on 04/26/2008, -8/+62*****.. off... Bush... quit snorting coke and screwing your country.
Seriously... can you even THINK of a worse president.... EVER???
America used to have the BEST economy in the world... and in 8 short years he has turned you into a laughing stock. You have the power as voters.... please fix it.
Signed,
The rest of the world - Sassanix, on 04/26/2008, -8/+61I got family in Iran :(
- pintomp3, on 04/26/2008, -12/+56it's not about what's good or bad for our economy. it's about what's good for the military industrial complex, the contractors and mercenaries, and israel.
- inactive, on 04/26/2008, -15/+58Thank You Israel
- americangoy, on 04/26/2008, -14/+55Uh oh.
And this is washington post....
I really do NOT want to take this seriously, but I can see the AIPAC and pro Israel crowd in Congress making this idiot retard president take this desperate, idiotic step... - inactive, on 04/26/2008, -10/+49***** WAR
- Ruger11mcrdpi, on 04/26/2008, -8/+45Unlike the 99.9% of the people who post here... I am a Marine infantryman. It'll be my ass out there getting shot at if we did this crap, not you. that said it's totally impossible right now. Our military is stretched too thin already and we're deploying more Marines to afghanistan to combat the rise in violence there. We simply dont have the resources. This post is not founded in fact. Plain and simple. Anyone who doubts this, just know we have about 700,000 active duty army and Marines in any fields, and of those about 10% are trigger pullers, with up to 40% deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq at any time. Show me on paper where the hell we'd have troops for another war and I'll show you a farce.
- SilverBlade2k, on 04/26/2008, -7/+43Attacking Iran will be suicide for the U.S in practically all matters. Oil will go skyrocketing. $200+ per barrel? Lets see ANYONE try to live within their means when oil is that high.
Iran will respond back. Maybe by pulling their oil from the market, maybe by military response by Iran and it's allies. Maybe both. But if the U.S invades Iran and begins to attack them, the U.S is *****..the whole world is *****. We would have entered WW3 at that time. - JoeLosFeliz, on 04/26/2008, -6/+41This disgusts me.
- str1fe, on 04/26/2008, -4/+38The hilarious part is that John McCain has a decent portion of the anti-war vote. Are people actually that blind? This country confuses me.
- db0255, on 04/26/2008, -7/+40neither did iraq, now stop yelling.
- felman87, on 04/26/2008, -10/+42Here's what I don't understand. We're allies with the Maliki Govt, so is Iran. Hell, they like Iran more than they like us. Shouldn't we be working together to bring stability to the country?
- chaosium, on 04/26/2008, -5/+35You're forgetting the millions of willing Americans who hate Ay-rabs, to the point where they confuse them for Persians.
- urgeigh, on 04/26/2008, -1/+24If you don't think Israel has anything to do with Iran then there's not enough time here to explain it to you. You could do a little research yourself but if you think AIPAC is just there to make sure people don't forget about the Holocause you're sadly mistaken.
- kolinkoolface2, on 04/26/2008, -5/+28it's not just neocons mate, hilary warned of tking nuclear action against iran and even obama said he supports action against pakistan
- pintomp3, on 04/26/2008, -3/+26they are just being duped into supporting it, they don't benefit from it.
- TripleAStacked, on 04/26/2008, -6/+27At this rate the American dollar will be worth less than the peso
- mrsteveman1, on 04/26/2008, -2/+23Obama said he would support striking terrorist camps in Pakistan given good intelligence, he said nothing about invading an entire country.
- schmitey, on 04/26/2008, -8/+28If we invade, and pure speculation here on my part, the military is going to have a full fledged ***** mutiny on its hands mark my works. If I were a serviceman/woman (and I'm not only because my hearing sucks BTW) facing my third+ deployment I wouldn't want to have anything to do with this *****. If enough military personal put their foot down there's no way they could court martial everyone...and the nation would never stand for it anyways. And a draft? ***** forget about it!
- chaosium, on 04/26/2008, -3/+23Well yeah, the people Republicans court the most receive the worst ***** from their policies.
- tifosiuno, on 04/26/2008, -7/+27This is why our stupid congress needs to impeach Bush and Cheney!
- Pherdnut, on 04/26/2008, -2/+21Um... yeah, Pelosi? Back on the table please. Right !@#$ing now.
- Motivaaator, on 04/26/2008, -9/+28Luckily for us, the US is broke, our military is already overextended, and there's no way we could start another war without instituting a draft, which would lead to mass public opposition.
- bitcloud, on 04/26/2008, -0/+17in related related news, Exonn Mobil posts largest profit of any company EVER, ANYWHERE.
this is liquidation of assets... they know oil has had it's day and they are scrambling to liquidate as much as they can as quickly as they can...
makes me sick - bitcloud, on 04/26/2008, -1/+18you're a terrible person... honestly, you're a monsterous person. You're voicing really poorly conceived opinions which demonstrate an almost inhumane level of compassion, understanding and intelligence...
good luck with that. - TrancePX, on 04/26/2008, -3/+19There is another way to save American lives, stop sending them to countries that aren't doing ***** to us and trying to make everyone obey our will.
- kolinkoolface2, on 04/26/2008, -3/+19yea and then the rest of us males between the ages of 18 and 25.
- selfobsessed, on 04/26/2008, -3/+19I'm going to call as many of my state and congressional representatives as I can tomorrow. I urge you all to do the same.
Enough is enough. These warmongers are not taking any more money and more importantly men and women from my country. - Dumbledorito, on 04/26/2008, -4/+20Your side is guilty of cherry-picking intel, listening to Chalabi and "curveball," and not disclosing the craptastic sources they were trusting about Iraq.
And who's all for this little adventure? Which party is that again?
Do us all a favor and stop your own Dear Leader before he COMPLETELY flushes this country down the toilet. - Brasky, on 04/26/2008, -2/+18Since when does public support matter to these *****?
- drowningfish, on 04/26/2008, -0/+15The problem with your logic Jabber is that this time the United States is the aggressor not a force of defense. We have killed tens of thousands since going into Iraq. So how many more people are going to die from our neocon-induced menstrual cycles?
In a world where mass death can occur by a flip of switch - war should never come easy. The very putrid smell of modern warfare on a global scale should be enough to keep zealots at bay. But unfortunately; in today's world, the zealots like you are in control right now. People like you hold humanity hostage for the benefit of an almighty dollar arrogantly sucking on oil's ***** so you can continue a lifestyle of over exuberance at the expense of others. People like you hold the world hostage in the name of a bastardized religion; expelling innocent lives on a daily basis in the name of prophet.
***** you. - str1fe, on 04/26/2008, -2/+17I don't care how good your comment might have been, I saw all caps and buried on principle. If you want your point to get across, use some semblance of grammar. Thank you.
- inactive, on 04/26/2008, -4/+19Along those lines, why does everyone in the media automatically believe the story about the Syrian "nuclear reactor"?
The administration lied us into Iraq, can't they remember that far into the past? - motivatedmama, on 04/26/2008, -1/+15Powerful, disturbing and the truth. A must see. Pitchfork anyone?
- patientzero, on 04/26/2008, -2/+16"We used to be huge allies with Iran and gave them a ***** of money and arms, until the Iran contra thing happened where they turned their backs on us, what do we do?"
We "traded" weapons to Iran in exchange for money and hostages, used the money to support insurgents in Nicaragua who were known to rape, murder, peddle cocaine, and destroy crops.
How exactly did they turn their backs on us? Are you saying they snitched? Its nice that you're bringing this whole blow-back thing to light, but get it straight: no one turned their backs on us. We're one big Geppetto country that likes to play with the comparably smaller Pinocchio countries for *****, giggles, and--very often--profit.
We couldn't give a ***** about revenge. *****, with all of the weapons we have we could blow the entire world up dozens of times over until it looked like a cored apple. Who needs revenge? - bjornski, on 04/26/2008, -1/+15Russia has already said they'd defend Iran. And China would be none too happy if we invaded one of their prime resource suppliers also.
If we attack Iran, I can see the Chinese stopping shipments of goods to us, which would cripple us within months. They wouldn't even have to fire a shot to take down this country. How would we respond? MORE war threats? Paid for by whom? China?
And yet, during this war and the upcoming one, the screams for "tax cuts" just continues.
Tax cuts should be ILLEGAL in a time of war. Pick a priority. You can't have both. - urgeigh, on 04/26/2008, -7/+21And you are an idiot. Any military action forced on Iran by the United States is not because our people fear it. But because Zionists, AIPAC and the rest of the Jewish community does not want Iran to have nuclear capabilities because they fear the implications it may have on Israel. The lack of comments on this thread regarding Israel just goes to show how little the American people really know about the state of our foreign affairs. Israel and the Jewish lobby in Washington have EVERYTHING to do with what's going to happen between the U.S. and Iran in the near future. And anyone who speaks out against their opinions is automatically labeled an anti-Semite, regardless of their actual beliefs. Trust me, no one is worried about Iran actually nuking us, that's just what they have to tell John Q. Taxpayer in order to get support for yet another unconstitutional, fruitless military invasion of a sovereign country. And most of you are buying it. Look into Iran's energy crisis and you might see why this country wants nuclear power. And believe it or not, most Persians (Iranians) very much love the American people, they just don't trust our government, much the same as we don't trust their psychotic leaders or our own Government. It's really kind of Ironic if you ever can see the true full picture. Watch videos about AIPAC and the Jewish Lobby, read about it. Hell, write a letter to someone. And just so you know, calling people essentially un-American because they don't agree that we should be going gung-ho into Iran just shows your utter ignorance and misunderstanding of diplomacy and all the morals and ideas the U.S. was founded on. I say you're the one who doesn't appear to be a U.S. citizen. If you're really worried about a nuclear holocaust why aren't you asking why the U.S. government still harbors the most deadly arsenal of weaponry ever assembled in the history of the world. And why won't we ever dismantle ours?
- KJGJ, on 04/26/2008, -2/+16Mass public opposition would be putting it lightly.
- MxM111, on 04/26/2008, -7/+21I do not think that the article is true. There must be plans already for attack of most of the countries, and they always should have been - it is military - they have to be ready for everything. Of cause, those plans are updated from time to time. But existence of this plans has nothing to do with actual going to war!
-
Show 51 - 100 of 595 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is