digg

Join DiggAbout

The FOX-McAuliffe Love Fest Must Stop watch!

bravenewfilms.org — FOX is now using McAuliffe's praise as a TV ad to prove just how fair and balanced they are. Help us tell McAuliffe the truth.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • themightylex, on 04/27/2008, -12/+30When I saw the footage of McAuliffe say this the morning after the primary, I was sickened. It seemed so low, as if the Clinton Machine was willing to suck up to FOX if it meant more votes. To be interviewed is just free press, but to be sycophantic is disgusting.
    • JimmySpaza, on 04/27/2008, -17/+7Disgusting? You obviously haven't seen the latest Moyers-Wright marketing campaign video...er, interview.
      • ichbeineinrcg, on 04/27/2008, -6/+9Buried for putting Bill Moyers in the same context as Fox News. Murdoch's mercenaries with they had half the chops that Bill has shown for decades.
        • NoStoppingUs, on 04/27/2008, -4/+1LOL

          someone forgot their sarcasm tag. :(
      • jbenson2, on 04/27/2008, -10/+2JimmySpaza - Good counter point. However, Moyers is a has-been who was sent out to pasture. The only thing he can do is throw softball questions to racists and anti-American people who share the perverted views of Moyers.
    • NoStoppingUs, on 04/27/2008, -8/+3you guys are just ***** off that clinton is gaining on you guys. actually, obama's just collapsing. clinton isn't doing anything new. obama's sucking up to fox news as well, ladies. didnt you see the chris wallace interview?

      waaa waaa waaaaaaa
      • offspring06, on 04/27/2008, -1/+5Sorry but Hillary didn't gain much when she won Pennsylvania. She is still way behind in the delegate count.
    • NoStoppingUs, on 04/27/2008, -9/+2p.s. heres the smart thing to do. push for obama to drop out for the 'good of the party' because clearly clinton wont drop out. mccain will win when the obama supporters are so furious at clinton that they stay home and let mccain win. obama campaigns for four years saying "i told you so", he runs in 2012 and wins.

      but thats just thinking logically, and clearly the obombers don't think logically.
    • nofrickenway, on 04/27/2008, -1/+0CNN can give her the state when only 10% (or less, I started watching at 10%) of the vote is counted? Then they talk about just what will be the margin, 10%, 5% 1%?!?!?! How can you declare a winner, knowing that it could be 1%? Doesn't that mean it could even swing 1%+ more and give him the slight victory? Fox declared BEFORE CNN? All pre-primary polls aside, this is *****.
    • charlietuna, on 04/27/2008, -1/+5I am convinced Fox wants Hillary as the nominee. She would unite the Republican base in their shared hatred of her. The GOP knows how to attack her. In contrast Obama is perhaps more teflon than Bill was.
  • curtstoff, on 04/27/2008, -10/+23This is a continuation of the shameless right wing media courting of the Clinton campaign.
    • lunagrace, on 04/27/2008, -3/+12Or is it the Clinton Campaign joining the Right Wing Conspiracy? Hillary is looking a lot like Karl Rove these days.
    • Moxsea, on 04/27/2008, -6/+4I digg your comment, but might sound contemptuous when I say get a clue: Clinton is right wing.
    • defektiv, on 04/27/2008, -2/+3of course they are. its the only chance they have at getting mccain in the white house. why people don't generally question to themselves why neocons would be praising a democrat is beyond me. that fact alone would have me running the other way from whoever they supported.
  • nezualimon, on 04/27/2008, -8/+36okay is there any doubt left that the clinton campaign is not ethical and hungers for power at ANY cost? i mean come on this is FOX!!!
  • bmwg84, on 04/27/2008, -8/+20It's a travesty and frankly a stab in the back to the Democratic party for McAuliffe to make those comments. I was watching live when Hillary carried PA, and as neutral as I would like to feel, this McAuliffe guy sounded completely ludicrous and ridiculous. This is a great example of how LOW & Slimy the Clinton campaign is; and then for FOX to have the AUDACITY to use McAuliffe's own words support themselves when they are aware *FOX* are the real extremists.. it is absolutely disgusting.
  • VP505, on 04/27/2008, -10/+15Praising FAUX Noise is about as disgusting as Hillary praising McSameasBu$h
  • wardropper, on 04/27/2008, -4/+20Do we HAVE a Democratic Party any more?
    • billyjack1958, on 04/27/2008, -8/+10We should be asking the same question about the Republican Party which has totally abandoned conservatives everywhere with their push for mcbush. I am going to solve the dilemna for me personally by voting for Ron Paul no matter what. I am Sick of the status quo and Dr Paul is the ONLY candidate who presents us with the opportunity to save our beloved republic and its Constitution. The fact that he is an economic scholar is icing on the cake....
    • cuda72, on 04/27/2008, -3/+6Yes there is a democratic party.And its bigger than ever.It now includes most of the republican party.
    • NonLeftistDiggr, on 04/27/2008, -6/+1Is that a joke? There have never been more democrats by % in the history of the country when all the closet democrats who like to wrongly think of themselves as moderate independents are counted.
    • stonewaljacksn, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1nope. as you can tell, the Bush administration pretty much dumped all the small government, conserve money principles of the old Republicans and have now met the Democrats at the center. bow down to future president, McClintoBama, the ultimate operative for Wall Street. (don't believe me? check out what bankers are supporting all 3 of em. Wall Street is winning this election no matter what)
      I too am writing in Ron Paul.
  • iknowjackshit, on 04/27/2008, -8/+5Now we all know what the definition of "is" is. As in . . . "We (the Clinton campaign) will do whatever "is" necessary to win." Now if they will just get off their knees.
  • fredricktoo, on 04/27/2008, -5/+10what next? she appears on Limbaugh's show?
    • rivercs, on 04/27/2008, -4/+1Her husband has already guest-hosted Limbaugh's show.
    • sassip, on 04/27/2008, -1/+4She runs ads on there. She ran 4 ads the day Limblow called for "Riots @ the Dems Convention"
  • Martita12count, on 04/27/2008, -7/+10Why would any objective person listen to so called journalists who are blatantly tools of division and misinformation. A phony news organization designed to prop up the illegal and unconstitutional deeds of the most corrupt and destructive government in recorded history. Hitler would be jealous of such an indoctrination machine.
  • sh27696, on 04/27/2008, -9/+6Well not an organized one, hey Howard Dean are you off of vacation yet? We can't hope to beat Fox, if we don't oppose fox, this is sort of like what Pelosi and Reed have been doing for the last 2 years, having tried to withhold money for the occupation of Iraq once the president vetoed the bill, and Reed an Pelosi, have been unwilling to lead the fight to stop spending money like a drunken sailor in Iraq ever since. you can't hope to defeat an enemy that you don't actually oppose. Fox Lies, and now McCauliffe swears to it, when a few short years ago he privately swore at Fox . have we learned nothing in 8 years, fox calling a race first, doesn't even mean they have it right, in 2000 the Fox guy who called it for Bush on the night of the election, was a cousin of W's eventually the Supreme Court said W could be president, because Fox and others (who don't have corporate votes just individuals) said he won an election, that when counted by any measure he lost. the supreme Court merely said, we don't care what the votes really were we don't intend to count them, because if we did, George W Bush might be embarrassed to have acted like he won an election he lost, well obviously fox hasn't changed it's tune in the last 8 years, but McCauliffe sure has. Hillary and Co. this has to stop, you don't really think that Fox is going to help you rather than John (Bomb Iran) McCain in the general election. We stopped Fox from sponsoring a Democratic debate early in the primary season, we need to shut them out of Democratic party discourse for the remainder of the Presidential election season.
    • Stevanoski, on 04/27/2008, -4/+3Yes, stopped the NAACP sponsored debate, you racist.
  • Hathaway000, on 04/27/2008, -5/+14Very simple. McAullife kissing FoxNoises ass, means Obama gets my vote.
  • oldguru, on 04/27/2008, -8/+9I am wondering just what the difference is between Hillary and the Republicans. Her tactics are the same. She has accepted support from Murdoch and Scaife. She seems to believe that she is entitled to the presidency. Bill seems to think that he is entitled to a third term with her as a figurehead. I say it is time for a decent human being as president. I support Obama.
  • bcamp1973, on 04/27/2008, -7/+6I think i just threw up a little bit in my mouth...
  • DiggLive, on 04/27/2008, -18/+12Fox News is WAY more balanced than Digg. At least they gave credit for Hillary winning PA by double digits. Digg users resorted to digging up fake stories about how she'll only win one delegate, and making a big deal out of a few tenths of a percent.

    Digg hypocrisy at it again.
    • mattfiller, on 04/27/2008, -9/+10Only people who would kiss the Fox's butt hold on to 9.2% as 2 digits. Sorry, but the math isn't there. As if it mattered. She needed to win by 25% to even make a small dent in Obama's lead in delegates. She needed the 10% that was there overnight before the late returns came in to raise some money.

      The real problem with Hillary & Co. is that she'd rather have Fox and friends in charge for another 4 years so she can try again in 2012 than let Obama get in and make the Repers stop digging the hole we are in deeper for another 8 years. Why do you support that?
      • DiggLive, on 04/27/2008, -8/+5I support it because I'd rather see Clinton or McCain as president than Obama, and I'm going to do everything in my power to see that it happens. It would make Digg an interesting place for the election because nothing positive about Clinton or negative about Obama ever gains exposure here. It's nothing more than groupthink.
        • theLensman, on 04/27/2008, -4/+2Keep drinking that Clinton Koolaid. I believe with all my Heart that if McCain is elected it will be the finishing blow to democracy in this country. I am a full supporter of Obama but I would rather see Hillary(republican lite) as president than McCain. And if she steals the nomination from Barack then I will reluctantly vote for her. But STEALING is the only way she is going to get it.
        • Joe11Blue, on 04/27/2008, -2/+1You're joking right? You want a person that actively lies to try and get support? Lies about being under fire, and hides her ill gotten gains? A crook and a liar.

          Wow, I remember when people wanted someone that had even a little integrity as their president. Now people just seem to have given up, and will take whoever is the most authoritative. 20 year's ago behavior like this was unacceptable. WTF happened in this country?
    • BN2L, on 04/27/2008, -3/+2Digg doesn't pretend to be 'fair and balanced'. Its a community controlled website.
  • gmbi007, on 04/27/2008, -5/+7So glad McAuliffe is out and Dean is in.
    Go Obama!
    • Stevanoski, on 04/27/2008, -7/+5Me too because Mcal. got a democrat elected to Pres. twice while Dean has lost the Presidency to Republicans twice. Go Dean Go, oops I mean stay.
      • Joe11Blue, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1Yeah, cause we can sacrifice decency for a win right? Win at all costs. That's the thinking that's making this country do so well right?
        • Stevanoski, on 04/27/2008, -2/+2And Gore didn't try to steal the election going to an all democrat (committed, die hard) Florida Supreme court making the SCOTUS enter and restore order. That is ethical? I'll take the way it has turned out any day.
  • mattfiller, on 04/27/2008, -3/+6Hillary and her "friends" see the world mainly in terms of actors they can due business with. That is why I support Obama.
  • sallyb36, on 04/27/2008, -8/+1Daffy Duck couldn't have done better, or, is that worse?
    When I was a kid, many years ago, my mother cautioned to "never put anything in writing" because it could be used against you. The "writings" of today include modern technology like TV interviews. McCauliffe chose to disregard Fox's past and chose to write his message to the present. Hmmm.. pride goes before a great fall... or is that before a great fool?
  • sulu, on 04/27/2008, -8/+3May I be excused? Gotta go vomit..............
  • writebites, on 04/27/2008, -7/+9This is no love fest. Terry is PANDERING, which makes him a perfect match for Hillary. Who will they grovel to next, Karl Rove? Guess if you can't beat the "right-wing conspiracy" you join it.
    • Stevanoski, on 04/27/2008, -6/+3But he was your hero just a few years ago, go figure.
  • DJBALL, on 04/27/2008, -6/+8The 2 party system is pure theatre.
    I'm smh that you people are actually surprised by this.
    The Democrats report to the same corporate masters that the ***** serve.
  • marabout40, on 04/27/2008, -4/+4The Shameful Hypocrisy Of Clinton Chair Terry McAuliffe
    politicalbase.com — In a staggering episode of hypocrisy, Terry McAuliffe as DNC chair in 2003 threatened to harshly sanction Michigan if it moved-up its presidential primary, arguing that "I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules." Now, he's arguing that both Michigan and Florida should be counted to help Clinton.
    http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/The_Shameful_Hyp ...
    • runCMD, on 04/27/2008, -0/+1I've said that all along. Florida and Michigan voters should not be disenfrachised becuase some dufus in charge made a dumb statement - not even if Obama says their voices should not be counted. But because it's the RIGHT thing to do.
  • DaDrake, on 04/27/2008, -8/+4This is retarded.... from what I could see, each of those clips are from one of their debate shows. When one person calls Hillary the b-word, the other person is rolling her eyes... its obvious they have people of different opinions on their show. We didn't see the rebuttals to these comments which makes this video pointless.
    • theLensman, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1the point is there were no rebuttals (on Fox at least)
    • Joe11Blue, on 04/27/2008, -0/+0Using derogatory word's doesn't form an opinion. It's simple conjecture, and makes for a good sale, while still leaving the person open to agree with the slandered person. Must be this new Jerry Springer generation that's here now.
  • Stevanoski, on 04/27/2008, -8/+7And don't forget, die hard Dem. Ed Rendell says Fox is the only network covering the Dem.s in a fair and balanced way. Bet some tinfoil hats blew up when the loonbats wearing them heard that.
  • Brickem, on 04/27/2008, -3/+6This is disgraceful! Fox News is quite obviously anything but "fair and balanced." Fox News is an abomination and a mockery to responsible TV journalism.
    • runCMD, on 04/27/2008, -0/+1: ) Lets see .. if a news program shows a tipping interest in your candidate - then they have it RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!! ... but if they have a different story to tell - then they are the worst kind of journalism on the face of the earth . LOL
      You guys are hilarious. Better than TV.
  • Stonecipher26, on 04/27/2008, -2/+6McAullife is the epitome of what is wrong with the Democratic Party. He is the absolute worst.
  • cuda72, on 04/27/2008, -2/+4WOW So many act surprised about this.Like there is a difference between dem and a rep in our one party system.You would have thought pelosi would have been the the light to the truth of the deception for the snoozer out there.Well imagine that. And is it any wonder they call em Libtards?
  • Ewsheehan, on 04/27/2008, -3/+3The Clinton camp is showing its dark roots. I hope Terry McAuliffe was being sarcastic in calling Fox News "fair and balanced." However a senior political leader shouldn't risk being so misunderstood. Doesn't Hillary stand for anything? She should distance herself from that callous and bigoted remark of McAuliffe.
    • talktuff2, on 04/27/2008, -2/+2It is not likely when she probably told him to do it. They have gone over to the dark side. Clinton complimenting McCain who is a war monger and idiot who flip flops on just about everything he ever stood for and continues to flip flop non-stop about just about any issue. Although not smart at all he is getting a pass from the media who are snakes who only want to make sure a republican wins even one as incompetent and mean and vindictive as McCain is.
  • access88200, on 04/27/2008, -2/+3It comes as no real surprise that Terry would do this. Unfortunately this is simply how the Clinton's and those around them operate. Hillary and Bill will say ANYTHING to anybody in order to win. They are simply the most reprehensible and most disingenuous persons ever to rise to the top of the party. That's why we must all work to replace them with Barrack. No one should be under any illusions whatsoever that "Billary" should they not secure this year's nomination, will do everything behind the scenes to see that Barrack loses in November so that Hillary can come back in 2012. These people need to be eradicated from the Democratic Party. The only way to do that is to crush them like the bugs that they are. Barrack is attempting to take the high road and rightfully so, but the rest of us on the progressive side of the party need to take every opportunity through whatever means necessary (letters, emails, canvassing, etc.) to make sure these folks are put back under the rocks that they came from.
    • runCMD, on 04/27/2008, -0/+1You say all of that like there is some overriding truth to it. People like you, access - and Obama - make these broad statements with absolutely zero backup. Other like minded people drink it down and repeat with with their own changes in the mix. You are faux news! : ) But for real. For the rest of us that see past the sweet cadence and lovely tune of Barack's pied piper routine ... it's unfortunate to watch - but if you have to be led astray, then go. BUT, you're not taking my vote - or HALF the party's vote with you. We are standing firmly behind the Strongest candidate in this race ... Hillary Clinton. Barry blew it.
  • NonLeftistDiggr, on 04/27/2008, -4/+7Foxnews is the most biased media outlet I've ever seen in my life; as a digger that's why I must listen to Bill moyers, read Daily Kos, and subscribe to any blog-o-spam that says what I want to hear.
    • p51d007, on 04/27/2008, -0/+3Wow.......what an OPEN mind you have! You ONLY get your "news" from places that have the same opinion that you have.
      I get my news from VARIOUS sources. I'm conservative (not to be confused with Republican). I listen/watch various news sources, including those from foreign countries.
      That is the problem with liberals. They only want news/opinion that agrees with what they believe, and want to ban those
      with opposing views.
      • NonLeftistDiggr, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Economist is probably my favorite.
  • TypicalAfrican, on 04/27/2008, -3/+2It is a fact that the media is controlled by the CFR AND the Bush Administration compounded with the bloombarg crew. The Oppression Must End.
  • cheezeme, on 04/27/2008, -8/+1Who should they trot out there? Who do the Obama nerds want to see? There only going with the front runner, they smell blood in the water, and they want to cover the riots in Coloroda
  • TaraDiana, on 04/27/2008, -3/+3I am appalled that anyone in the Democratic Party, let alone it's leader, would praise Fox News for anything. What on earth could he have been thinking!
  • Lyingsack, on 04/27/2008, -2/+2The bed Hillary climbed in with Scaife and Rupert Murdoch is getting pretty crowded what with Terry McAuliffe and Ed Rendell climbing in too. It seems to me that since Hillary has been having a hard time raising money from Democrats she has resorted to courting the trash-talking right-wingers who did such a number on her and Bill to do the dirty work of attacking Obama on her behalf. Although at the beginning of the campaign I liked her, her tactics have completely turned me against her.
    • talktuff2, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1Amen. They have turned me off too.
  • boomernet, on 04/27/2008, -4/+4Why does everyone insist on calling FOX 'news'? I mean, putting the word news in their name is part of their marketing, but I don't think we need to buy in. If you watch the structure of a FOX broadcast it's essentially 'get people riled up, raise their heart rate, make people angry, and then go to commercial and as they calm down show them a product for them to buy'. I'm a trained hypnotist, and the structure of FOX broadcasts employs something called anchoring, where the products marketed during the commercials start to be linked unconsciously to the emotion of calm (or in this case, a lack of anger). Eventually, unconsciously, the subject will buy the product based on the fact that every time they see the ad they feel less angry. It's sick.
    • p51d007, on 04/27/2008, -0/+3Ok, how about Dan Rather and CBS news report on the FORGED documents, NBC blowing up a truck back in the 80's, etc etc etc.
  • talktuff2, on 04/27/2008, -2/+3How revolting that the Clintons are throwing themselves to the republicans that did nothing but make their lives miserable for 8 years and some. This is really stooping low by the Clintons and says to me how much we do not need Clintons in the whitehouse ever again. No McCain who Hilliary keeps praising, and no Clinton who will be a big mistake to truth that she says.
  • attic4fester, on 04/27/2008, -2/+2What is McAuliffe trying to get Obama elected?
  • buhbyebot, on 04/27/2008, -4/+2Hillary would sleep with Rush Limbaugh if it meant she could just get the nomination. She'd even go further than that to get elected. (suck her husband's *****)
    • p51d007, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1Rush wouldn't take any amount of money from that old sea hag.
  • tekhak, on 04/27/2008, -6/+8...Proof Positive that DIGG is anything but Fair and Balanced.
    • mrsammercer, on 04/27/2008, -2/+3Does is claim to be? Is it broadcast into millions of homes claiming that it is "fair and balanced" and in the position of being one of the major National news outlets? Fox News=/Digg.com The comparison is ridiculous and if you can't see that, it's safe to say that you are a ***** inbred.
    • Joe11Blue, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1You're an assdart, you know that right?
  • etzim, on 04/27/2008, -2/+2The fact that Faux News calls the results of an election early is neither laudable nor is it a comfort for Democrats. Anyone recall the Florida vote in November 2000? Wake up already.
    • p51d007, on 04/27/2008, -1/+3You mean the same Florida recount where Bush won EVER recount? Or the same one where Algore wanted to pick & choose the counties to recount? Or the same election where Algore wanted to BAN the overseas vote from members of the U.S. military?
      • Joe11Blue, on 04/27/2008, -0/+0Maybe you should listen to him. Bush won the electoral votes, not the popular vote.

        Even in the end the vote's had no bearing as the Federal Supreme court stepped in and declared the recount unconstitutional.

  • jjive, on 04/27/2008, -2/+2Why are you picking on Faux News?
    It's almost as funny as the "Daily Show", without the script.
    • Lazydriver, on 04/27/2008, -1/+2Because naive sons of a bitches believe in Fox News, whereas most people who watch the Daily Show/Colbert Report know it's sarcastic.
  • NYPD, on 04/27/2008, -10/+2As soon as NBC, CBS, ABC, MLSLD aka: PMS-NBC and CNN let go of BO's coat. O wait they are the "fair & balanced" News.

    WRONG AGAIN, YOU LIBS SUCK. Why are you Libs, well LIBS!
    • offspring06, on 04/27/2008, -1/+4Why are the right wing so unintelligent?
    • albatross5000, on 04/27/2008, -0/+1NYPD, you're an idiot dude. Sucks huh? Go read something -- do some research. Think a little ok? I mean, if you can...
  • JointVenture, on 04/27/2008, -4/+6Yet you suck Olbermanns virtual ***** on a nightly basis.

    How can one call themselves unbiased and bash Fox news for being bias(which they are) and then not acknowledge that folks like Olbermann are just as bad?
  • p51d007, on 04/27/2008, -5/+5Amazing to see the loony left come out anytime you mention the word Fox news.
    Sucks to be you guys that they have so many viewers.
    Shame your ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/NPR ratings are so bad that you have to resort to "get Fox off the air"
    propaganda. If Fox were so bad, their ratings would be as bad as CNN's
  • HikingDog, on 04/27/2008, -1/+0Hillary is working to destroy not only the Democratic party, she is destroying any chance Bill's administration will be remembered fondly by ANYONE.
    • runCMD, on 04/27/2008, -0/+1Hillary is working for me. And every level headed thinker who has chosen her over Senator Obama. Instead of attacking her - why not praise your own candidate ? She is doing what's required to carry my vote forward. Thank you Hillary! I am still behind you and still support your fight for what's right in this country. ( not that Obama isn't doing the same - it's just compared to Senator Clinton - he's the weaker candidate. ) IMHO.
  • PolymathicMan, on 04/27/2008, -2/+5LOL, I love how that video takes sarcastic hyperbole out of context and presents it as the truth.

    Digg will never change.
    • sovereign3, on 04/27/2008, -1/+2I'd like to believe you, but many Fox News viewers will see sarcastic hyperbole and interpret it as truth. Remember all those people who still believe Iraq has WMDs? I guarantee you they are also Fox News viewers.
    • edgedmurasame, on 05/11/2008, -0/+1Congratulations on being banned, polymathicman.
  • averagejoesgym, on 04/27/2008, -2/+4Fox News' popularity is the #1 example of why Obama was right when he said Americans are bitter. Fox is like crack to bitter people. Fox plays on their weaknesses and encourages their xenophobia.......that makes them more irrational and bitter which in turn makes them enjoy Fox even more....and on and on.
  • coustoe, on 04/27/2008, -2/+4liberals like to hear themselves whine.

    thats why you get those useless liberal art degrees and then live in your moms basements so you can cry to her every night.
  • 10ofDiamonds, on 04/27/2008, -3/+2All comments in this video were taken out of context. Also all but one of the comments were made by guests, not by fox news staff. There are plenty of legitamate reasons to dislike Fox, but this is *****. Try again libtards.
  • perrym, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1IM OUTRAGED AT FAOUX!!! IM SHAKING MY FISTS IN ANGER!!!!!!111111111111

    WE NEED TO STOP THEIR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS!!!!!!1111111111

    thank the FSM that there is yet another anti-fnc article on digg that i can express my outrage over.
    • runCMD, on 04/27/2008, -1/+1LOL. How un-democratic of you perrym. Sickening you might say. TAKE AWAY THEIR RIGHT TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS! Wait - this is America. They can voice their opinion. I can voice mine. And you can say whatever you want in your depends ... : )
  • polekitty, on 04/27/2008, -0/+2we report you decide,I did decide,I pulled the plug on that bunch of hate mongers. No way could I pray away that much sin.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 54 of 54 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.