Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
The Child Prostitution Ring that Reached Bush Whitehouse
voxfux.com — The following archive paints a chilling portrait of what is really going on in the upper echelons of the ruling elite here in America. The story involves children from orphanages in Nebraska being flown around the United States by top Republican officials in order to engage in child sex orgies with America's ruling elite.
SeaMowse- 1577 diggs
- digg it
- PatNolan, on 10/11/2007, -106/+43Exactly what won't you loony liberals make up?
- Corvidae, on 10/11/2007, -8/+23It's not made up, it's really old news, but truth none the less.
It wouldn't have much bearing, except it was Bush Sr. in the White house and half the officials from that time are still around. A token number of them went to prison of course. That's all it was though, a token number. Most of the people involved crawled back into the wood work and are still creeping around. It might be interesting to double check staffers between Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. and see if any of them were on the fringes of this. Doubtful, since most of those involved would be in lobbying or the private sector now. - lavoie0ca, on 10/11/2007, -19/+14Lets make a list!
WMD's where there are none.
Al Qaida in Iraq
"Mission Accomplished" Speeches
Election results
Rascist disaster response.- aliengoods, on 10/11/2007, -4/+9You list is woefully short. Try this one.
http://ostroyreport.blogspot.com/2005/10/list-of-bushs-lies-and-policy-failures.html - sanman, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1It was only a matter of time before the words "Bush Whitehouse" and "Child Prostitution" came together in the same title on Digg.
- aliengoods, on 10/11/2007, -4/+9You list is woefully short. Try this one.
- CheckPlease, on 10/11/2007, -9/+13Saddam Hussein having WMD's? Iraq being tied to 9-11? Credentials for Harriet Miers, Sneaky Gonzales, Michael Brown, et al? That's a few things liberals won't make up.
- jsmith39, on 10/11/2007, -10/+15Liberals making things up, now if that isn't the pot calling kettle black.
- danarama, on 10/11/2007, -4/+3well a disturbing amount of folks seem to be un effected by the fact that the ruling elite democrates or republicans seem to be a bunch of war mongering sociopathic pedophiles. lets make it a bipartisan issue.
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -2/+7I don't know what "loony liberals" won't make up, but I'm paleo-conservative and this elitist pedophilia makes my blood boil. I suppose the real question here is, 'what evil will you insane neo-conservatives not abide?'
- ZmannR2, on 10/11/2007, -8/+2The story is fake.......digg.com has become a liberal sesspool of BS..... wanna knoow the truth go here ----> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_King
- Corvidae, on 10/11/2007, -8/+23It's not made up, it's really old news, but truth none the less.
- RoundysSince, on 10/11/2007, -49/+149This is news from 20 years ago, and apparently the information was published in The Washington Times. On top of that, it's not even the Bush we hate.
I really don't trust a site that focuses on proving the 9-11 conspiracy, especially when they claim that "somebody gave the media the script too soon", just because BBC reported something that did not happen. Voxfux is far left bias at its finest.- bobcrotch, on 10/11/2007, -13/+11I can't believe my eyes, you said left biased and no one buried your comment.
- blaze4metal, on 10/11/2007, -8/+6Yeah, maybe Digg is becoming more mature and diverse and...ooo new Snorg girl...
- pogfreak, on 10/11/2007, -16/+24Bias isn't even the right word. I'm bias towards blondes and red heads. These people are bat ***** insane rhetoric spewing conspiracy nuts.
- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -12/+7"Nuts" is your only defense? Why is it that whenever someone says something against the govenment they are automatically "insane"? It's because that's all you can say in the face of so much evidence so that you have an excuse for not knowing the truth.
- TubaTechno, on 10/11/2007, -5/+6It's because people like you don't' know how to argue. You're completely making a strawman argument. He (or she) is not simply labeling them as "nuts" because they simply are saying things against the government. It's the specific theory that 9/11 was an inside job that gets people labeled that. You are a retard.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2You just can't make your way through a comment without name calling...can you?
It's people without much to say that do the labeling.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2You just can't make your way through a comment without name calling...can you?
- mtrip, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1People who believe in the NWO, black helicopters, the eventual invasion of the U.N., etc, are far, far right nutcases. They are so far right in fact that they've gone around the other side and met the far, far left halfway, and it's in those meetings that the 911 conspiracy gets made up.
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -7/+17Just go in emule, and type:
Conspiracy of silence
Franklin cover-up
John Decamp
You will get the documentary that was banned at the last minute before being aired on the Discovery Channel, because of pressures coming from Washington.
You will also get an interview and a book by a Republican Senator from Nebraska, John Decamp, who investigated this story at first believing there was not a single pedophile in the Republican party...he soon found out he was wrong, very wrong.
Fascinating stuff, makes me think of Twin Peaks, except it is real. And much better than anything coming from Hollywood.- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -3/+6Damn it digg, I paste a few lines and several lines get joined together! I wrote this:
Just go in emule, and type:
Conspiracy of silence
Franklin cover-up
John Decamp - TubaTechno, on 10/11/2007, -8/+3And of course it was banned because it was all true....... It couldn't EVER be banned because it might have been inaccurate........
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -3/+6Damn it digg, I paste a few lines and several lines get joined together! I wrote this:
- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -14/+8It's impossible to sneak up on the Pentagon in a lumbering passenger jet. 500 mph is slow compared to the stuff they've got and radar travels at light speed. Impossible. 9/11 was an inside job.
- knobtwiddler, on 10/11/2007, -4/+6are you saying WTC7 didn't collapse?
IDIOT- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/11/2007, -8/+3They're "Troofers" of course they're idiots.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1The name calling is getting so old.
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/11/2007, -8/+3They're "Troofers" of course they're idiots.
- ByteGuerilla, on 10/11/2007, -5/+2Why do we not have a bury category for old news?
- dontspamjay, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3Yet people keep digging the story up wishing it were true...
- bobcrotch, on 10/11/2007, -13/+11I can't believe my eyes, you said left biased and no one buried your comment.
- zoeskk, on 10/11/2007, -20/+17@patnolan
yes, common sense is to blame all the liberals when someone posts a eighteen year old article.- SeaMowse, on 10/11/2007, -9/+8The description of this article states that it is from an archive, so the fact that it is an 18 year old article shouldn't be a problem.
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Right; as if the pedophilia engaged by our ruling elite is no longer a relevant issue to discuss in 2007...
- SeaMowse, on 10/11/2007, -9/+8The description of this article states that it is from an archive, so the fact that it is an 18 year old article shouldn't be a problem.
- edesignweb, on 10/11/2007, -12/+2i see what ya did here.
- alexanEmpire, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1O RLY?
- silencerider151, on 10/11/2007, -47/+78Buried as inaccurate.
- adlaidemocrat, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Agreed. I don't know how this is getting so many diggs; are people really so blinded by ideology that they are willing to disregard the fact that this story has been widely disproven? In 1990, a grand jury dismissed this story as a "carefully crafted hoax."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Franklin_Coverup - FluffyRadish, on 03/19/2008, -0/+0buried as total horse crap.
- adlaidemocrat, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Agreed. I don't know how this is getting so many diggs; are people really so blinded by ideology that they are willing to disregard the fact that this story has been widely disproven? In 1990, a grand jury dismissed this story as a "carefully crafted hoax."
- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -22/+7WOW!!!!! You should be banned from digg.....
- djskitzy, on 10/11/2007, -21/+2820 years old? Even so, the fact that it was covered up, indicates it could still be running, in which case this is a viable post. It needs to be looked into again...
- Bobski, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Chappaquiddick? That is 40 years old. Even so, the fact that is was covered up, indicates a murderer could still be on the loose. It needs to be looked into again.
- jamesallen74, on 10/11/2007, -25/+20PatNolan: "Exactly what won't you loony liberals make up?"
Like conservatives are innocent on making stuff up. Yeah right.
For example, all the crap you all created to smear Clinton, not to mention the Sovient threat (there was no real threat), Al Queda being a huge dangerous well-organized network (they're really a small group of idiots over there). I am sure a LOT more could be dug up.- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -6/+13James, your comment could be the dumbest comment I have ever read. I actually like Bill Clinton so I wont touch that but your comment on the "Soviet Threat" is insane. There was nothing made up about thousands of Nuclear weapons that the Russians possessed, and if you knew anything about history or economics then you would know that in order for communism to work it has to spread. That's why citizens of countries like North Korea and Cuba are extremely poor and famished.
- lavoie0ca, on 10/11/2007, -8/+5Theres an ignorant bastard making up a whole bunch more stuff!
Things you just made up off the top of your head:
"In order for communism to work it has to spread" -- Uh, no?
"That's why citizens of countries like North Korea and Cuba are extremely poor and famished." -- um thats not why.
Ever heard of military first?
Ever heard of STFU? - krebcycle, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1Yeah, this whole thread is hijacked by loonies. I was hoping both sides of the loony-fence would get a good laugh at the insinuations that there is some child porn ring in the white house, when the 18 year old story was about a child porn ring that contained a few rich conservatives and lobbyists. Instead we get posts that there was no soviet threat, that all liberals are crazy conspiracy theorists, it just gets dumber and dumber. Sometimes I think Digg is nothing but a bunch of stoned hippies handing out leaflets and slack-jawed crackpot libertarians shooting injuns from their back porch.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1You didn't watch the video ... did you.
- lavoie0ca, on 10/11/2007, -8/+5Theres an ignorant bastard making up a whole bunch more stuff!
- jamesallen74, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1All I can say is google video "The Power of Nightmares" and see for yourself. Oh, and by the way, in case you never heard of that, it's okay, because it wasn't shown here in the U.S.
- notque, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Great Great movie. Adam Curtis rules.
- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -6/+13James, your comment could be the dumbest comment I have ever read. I actually like Bill Clinton so I wont touch that but your comment on the "Soviet Threat" is insane. There was nothing made up about thousands of Nuclear weapons that the Russians possessed, and if you knew anything about history or economics then you would know that in order for communism to work it has to spread. That's why citizens of countries like North Korea and Cuba are extremely poor and famished.
- skytoucher, on 10/11/2007, -20/+40People should look deeper into the article before instantly burying it. Are any of the 20+ articles linked to fake? People didn't have the awareness back then that the internet has provided us today. Actually reading these articles and understanding the points being made is chilling.
- unreg, on 10/11/2007, -3/+0To John Gacy. Best Wishes. Rosalynn Carter
- SeaMowse, on 10/11/2007, -34/+60To everybody:
I found the article to be very interesting, 'tabloid-ish' or not. Sure, the article relates to the senior Bush, but one should be able to figure that out if they actually read the article, as well as it's description. The title is not misleading, since it speaks in the past-tense.
Ban me? Why? Isn't Digg all about free speech and providing the Digg community with articles that the submitter finds interesting? The article is not a 'hate speech' article, nor does it involve porn, or spam - things that can get you banned from Digg. And let's not forget 'The Code' revolt, which technically, could have gotten the submitters of the 'code' articles banned.
As for 'loony liberals', I am neither.- yargthepirate, on 10/11/2007, -6/+12It has a misleading title. If you're going to post a 2-decade-old article, have the decency to put a disclaimer in the article description. Particularly in cases where the time frame isn't immediately obvious.
- SeaMowse, on 10/11/2007, -10/+10The title suggests that the article is about something in the past-tense, as I stated above. The content of the article is described in article's description. There is nothing that is really misleading here. The word 'archive' should be a big clue.
- echinda, on 10/11/2007, -3/+5Hairsplitting at its finest. "reached Bush Whitehouse" means, to the uninformed reader, that this ring reached the current Bush Whitehouse in the last six years.
Buried as inaccurate. - SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/11/2007, -9/+2Dude. You're a piece of ***** conspiracy theory freak. We're sick of your kind on Digg. For that alone you should be banned.
What CT don't you believe in? - THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1"What CT don't you believe in?" The theory that 9/11 was perpetrated by mentally deficient Muslims with boxcutters, for example. As for being sick of this "kind" on Digg, I'm not sure the people raking in the ad dollars would agree.
- SeaMowse, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1@SpaceMonkyZero ' Dude, I'm not big on any 'conspiraqcy theory'. I found the article interesting. Period. And just who is 'my kind'?
And on the side note - to everybody who is using the word 'Dude'. How old are you guys?
- echinda, on 10/11/2007, -3/+5Hairsplitting at its finest. "reached Bush Whitehouse" means, to the uninformed reader, that this ring reached the current Bush Whitehouse in the last six years.
- SeaMowse, on 10/11/2007, -10/+10The title suggests that the article is about something in the past-tense, as I stated above. The content of the article is described in article's description. There is nothing that is really misleading here. The word 'archive' should be a big clue.
- yargthepirate, on 10/11/2007, -6/+12It has a misleading title. If you're going to post a 2-decade-old article, have the decency to put a disclaimer in the article description. Particularly in cases where the time frame isn't immediately obvious.
- Travisx2, on 10/11/2007, -4/+59It's the "Super Adventure Club"
- wakananda, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3Truth hiding in plain sight. The only episode I didn't laugh at (and not because Chef was killed off).
- gjscds, on 10/11/2007, -11/+21VOX News: The News...before it happens.
Posts a 20 year old story?- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -4/+0hahahaha
- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -0/+5If you don't know it happened, whenever you find out it's news to you.
- dunner777, on 10/11/2007, -20/+9lame lame lame, dude you should be banned
- Bogie22, on 10/11/2007, -26/+8This shows just how pathetic and intellectually dishonest Liberals are.
- WasabiBomb, on 10/11/2007, -4/+10Whereas Conservatives are paragons of moral fortitude and honesty.
Putz.- willgill, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Heheh count the Diggs downs on Bogie22 and Diggs on you. Sort of a quick poll on how my liberals have time to read this crap.
- WasabiBomb, on 10/11/2007, -4/+10Whereas Conservatives are paragons of moral fortitude and honesty.
- draigfire, on 10/11/2007, -21/+11This is a non story what kind of trouble are you trying to stir up? Shady story.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Another one that didn't bother to watch the video.
- civperc, on 10/11/2007, -24/+12Hmmm, somehow this ummm... a BIT hard to believe. Agreed?
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2Not at all.
- Raian, on 10/11/2007, -8/+44Messed-up, sick people find there way in to positions of authority for this very reason... I don't think this is a strictly political or partisan issue.
Here is another similar-- but even sicker example from Canada http://www.theinquiry.ca
A group of priests, and other social type workers all came together and systematically abused boys-- they created something they called "The Clan"-- at the above site a woman documented everything.- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -3/+8Damn straight. When a culture of perversion takes hold, it never changes. That's why the Catholic church is full of pedophiles, the only way to stop it would be to destroy the entire organization. Even then the pedophiles would eventually collect somewhere else. If there was pedophilia in the white house 20 years ago, you'd better believe nothing changed.
Furthermore, people who cling to government liars want an easy-out so when they begin to hear the truth they kill the messenger by calling him a "conspiracy nut". Sometimes the guy is yelling "fire" in a theater because there's a fire in the theater.- kinneas666, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Actually in a fairly recent public release by 3 seperate insurance companies which represent mainstream protestant churches it was found that in the cases involving these 3 companies alone pedophilia among clergymen and children was about 3 times higher than what was found in the catholic church.
Note that these are just reported cases.
It isnt just catholics priests that are responsible for these sick crimes but obviously demented people masquerading as religious and civil leaders worldwide.
- kinneas666, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Actually in a fairly recent public release by 3 seperate insurance companies which represent mainstream protestant churches it was found that in the cases involving these 3 companies alone pedophilia among clergymen and children was about 3 times higher than what was found in the catholic church.
- DiscoRage, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I am from Cornwall, Ontario. I know for a FACT that everything from theinquiry.ca is true. Catholic Priests in the Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry counties (Cornwall is located in this tri-county region) have been molesting children dating back almost 50 years. Several Priests have been charged, several have killed themselves to avoid trial or incarceration. Officer Perry Dunlop, who blew the whistle on this scandal, was a friend of the family when all of this came out during the mid 90s.
I won't lie, I loathe the Bush administration, and I can't wait until Jr. is out of office. I can't stand ignorant, right wing politics. However, this website looks like nothing more than far left propaganda, which is on par with far right propaganda. When the author of an article misspells common words, I don't take them too seriously.
- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -3/+8Damn straight. When a culture of perversion takes hold, it never changes. That's why the Catholic church is full of pedophiles, the only way to stop it would be to destroy the entire organization. Even then the pedophiles would eventually collect somewhere else. If there was pedophilia in the white house 20 years ago, you'd better believe nothing changed.
- Faubio, on 10/11/2007, -21/+9Break out the tin foil hats.
- expat001, on 10/11/2007, -5/+1yeah people might actually think republicans are good people!
- graizur, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5Every group is good people numskull. Muslims are good people. Christians are good people. Pagans are good people. Potheads are good people. Republicans are good people. Democrats are good people.
That is if you believe in good people at all. Which I don't to begin with, but hey keep on making it about groups you tribal thinking backwater gene pool tainting dead end.
- graizur, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5Every group is good people numskull. Muslims are good people. Christians are good people. Pagans are good people. Potheads are good people. Republicans are good people. Democrats are good people.
- expat001, on 10/11/2007, -5/+1yeah people might actually think republicans are good people!
- civperc, on 10/11/2007, -9/+820 years? Yowza
- schnoggi, on 10/11/2007, -16/+51who cares if it's 20 years old? what a stupid thing to judge it by. this story is real, and it's never really broken through. go ahead and guffaw about looney liberals, rocking and drooling on your porch with all the other dinosaurs.
- Bobski, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Well, then. If you don't mind opening up old stories, lets crack open Kennedy's manslaughter of Mary Jo Kopechne in 1969.
- willgill, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Does this mean we'll be reading all that Clinton crap again? Aren't liberals supposed to be "progressive"?
- SuckItUp, on 10/11/2007, -21/+8I know there are good liberals out there, but this kind of crap really taints you guys.
- willgill, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1And they don't like it.... check your Digg downs. LOL Can't wait for mine!
- SilentJay74, on 10/11/2007, -22/+6Ok dude, if you don't know, we diggers appreciate cool, NEW,stories. This is the stupidest thing I have ever read. We are all now dumber for having read it, and may God have mercy on you soul.
- bobcrotch, on 10/11/2007, -18/+16The stupid part about this is that people see the title and auto digg it because they hate Bush.
- opiophile, on 10/11/2007, -4/+5Hmm. Good point. DUGG!
- TubaTechno, on 10/11/2007, -5/+3This proves he eats babies!!!! DUGG!!!!!11
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2I, for one, actually Dugg it out of hatred of pedophilia and child abuse, but believe whatever helps you sleep, I suppose..
- rowlodge, on 10/11/2007, -15/+3retarded...
- expat001, on 10/11/2007, -11/+7Let me guess and these same rethugs were supports and card carry members of the Rev. Falwell
Scumbags - HighPriest15, on 10/11/2007, -5/+6Barney Frank?
- elleanee, on 10/11/2007, -9/+30anybody wanna know more about it (and it's still going on), read "Trance Formation of America" by Cathy O'Brien, but only if you've got a strong stomach. There'll be more and more of this coming to light and you better brace yourselves. understandable that your first reaction is disbelief or that it's old news. it's shocking. once you can accept that it has and is happening, take a look further down the rabbit hole, if you dare.
- HotDogBun, on 10/11/2007, -5/+1yeah, becvause cathy obrien was sodomized by sparky anderson and gerald ford at an independence day parade with a miniature flag. brace yourselves alrite, brace yourself from hours of gut ripping laughter when you read this ridiculous book.
- Ogopogo, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Cathy O'Brien is not the only one to speak out. Google " Brice Taylor " (Sue Ford) for another well documented case.
- dalexandruz, on 10/11/2007, -10/+1some ppl never evolved and still have money brains. stupid ass monkeys.
- IDCrewDawg, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8This story was done on dateline or 60 minutes, maybe another TV news show. But it was done about 5 years ago.
- ColonelJessup, on 10/11/2007, -12/+5Damn it, is that Snorg tee girl going to take off her shirt or not?
I'm still waiting......- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -5/+1NO KIDDING... Chick is a fox!
- alexanEmpire, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Totally....I'd hit it like a 747 Jumbo Jet.
- CorpT, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I'd hit it so hard, whoever pulled me out would become King of England.
- alexanEmpire, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Totally....I'd hit it like a 747 Jumbo Jet.
- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -5/+1NO KIDDING... Chick is a fox!
- petsheep, on 10/11/2007, -7/+14digg is about information, this is history, though slanted to the left, we all digg for different likes and dislikes, like I read elsewhere, a history section would be nice.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+4How did wanting to investigate possible child abuse and pedophilia activity in the government become a 'slanted to the left' issue?
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3And when did history cease to be information?
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+4How did wanting to investigate possible child abuse and pedophilia activity in the government become a 'slanted to the left' issue?
- suddenfalter, on 10/11/2007, -8/+6That's _child's-play_ compared to what's going on in Iraq...
- CDoug03, on 10/11/2007, -6/+1Wrong Bush lame-o! And I was hoping for some good dirt too...
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -6/+26Just go in emule, and type:
Conspiracy of silence
Franklin cover-up
John Decamp
You will get the documentary that was banned at the last minute before being aired on the Discovery Channel, because of pressures coming from Washington.
You will also get an interview and a book by a Republican Senator from Nebraska, John Decamp, who investigated this story at first believing there was not a single pedophile in the Republican party...he soon found out he was wrong, very wrong.
Fascinating stuff, makes me think of Twin Peaks, except it is real. And much better than anything coming from Hollywood.- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3The interview of senator Decamp by Alex Jones:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2004/210704johndecamp.htm
The site about the Franklin cover-up:
http://www.franklincase.org/ - freecon, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2This stuff also happens at Bohemian Grove!
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Certainly; I can't even imagine what they are doing to children up there. They're probably frustrated that they can only burn effigies of children these days..
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3The interview of senator Decamp by Alex Jones:
- elleanee, on 10/11/2007, -7/+11there's information to be found on this topic, only no one has been courageous enough to post it, til now. plus, most people aren't ready to hear it, which explains many of the above comments. believe it. it's true. read cathy o'brien's "trance formation of america. venture a bit further down the rabbit hole...if you dare!
- adma84, on 10/11/2007, -8/+1oh man, it must totally be true! I saw it on the internet!
- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I dare. Lay it on me!
- vonnegut, on 10/11/2007, -17/+5Remember when digg used to be cool instead of f`ing stupid?
- qwerty1024, on 10/11/2007, -6/+2no..
- m3t00, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1when I was 13 it could have been
- militant, on 10/11/2007, -5/+30the documentary itself: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=866739408240639313
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4This video is worth watching.
- generalloy, on 10/11/2007, -8/+38The present Bush's (Attorney General) Alberto Gonzales covered up child molestation of 10-21 year old kids that was going on in a Texas youth detention center. http://www.inteldaily.com/?c=130&a=1501
And you wonder why Bush can't fire him :) Lots of skeletons in that closet.
" Albert Moskowitz, the Chief of the Criminal Section of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, sent a letter dated September 27, 2005, to the Superintendent of the Texas Youth Commission's West Texas State School youth detention facility declining the prosecution of two of the Texas agency's employees -- Ray Brookins and John Hernandez -- for engaging in sexual molestation of 10 underage males incarcerated at the facility. The charges of molestation were originally brought by Texas Ranger Brian J. Burzynski. Earlier, in a July 28, 2005 letter, the Assistant US Attorney for West Texas, Bill Baumann, who works for US Attorney Johnny Sutton, a close friend of Gonzales, sent a letter to Burzynski declining federal prosecution in the pedophile case. In a decision that indicates that the Gonzales Justice Department defines child molestation in very narrow and high threshold terms, Baumann wrote that the young men at the West Texas facility that claimed they were raped by Brookins and Hernandez did not sustain "bodily injury" or "bodily pain." Baumann also defined aggravated sexual assault as resulting from a "perpetrator knowingly causing his victim to engage in a sexual act (which can include contact between the mouth and penis) by force against the victim or by threatening or placing the victim in fear that the victim (or any other person) will be subjected to death, serious bodily injury or kidnapping). Baumann stated, "I do not believe that sufficient evidence exists to support a charge that either Brookins or Hernandez used force to cause victims to engage in a sexual act.""
The decision of the Gonzales Justice Department to decline prosecution of pedophiles within the Texas Youth Commission juvenile detention system mirrors its failure to take prompt action last year in the case of former Representative Mark Foley (R-FL), whose e-mails with underage male congressional pages were turned over to the Justice Department for investigation. On October 3, 2006, WMR reported the following:"- PjsPjs, on 10/11/2007, -0/+121 year old kids?
10 year old kids in the same jail as adult offenders?
10 year old kids in jail? - SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I'm not saying this is true or not... Afterall, inteldaily.com is OBVIOUSLY slanted "news" source... But just to be picky... since when are 18-21 year olds victims of "child molestation"?
Rape? sure, they can be victims of rape. But they're no longer children.- jegub, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2I didn't find any reference to specific ages in the article, so I looked up "West Texas State School". Assuming the facility referenced by http://www.tyc.state.tx.us/programs/westtexas/index.html is the same institution, then it "is currently budgeted to serve an all-male population of 250 delinquent youth between the ages of 10 and 20 with an average age of 16. "
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2SpaceMonkeyZero is a buck private in the digg whitewashing army.
- jegub, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2I didn't find any reference to specific ages in the article, so I looked up "West Texas State School". Assuming the facility referenced by http://www.tyc.state.tx.us/programs/westtexas/index.html is the same institution, then it "is currently budgeted to serve an all-male population of 250 delinquent youth between the ages of 10 and 20 with an average age of 16. "
- PjsPjs, on 10/11/2007, -0/+121 year old kids?
- skytoucher, on 10/11/2007, -6/+27So there is legitimate 'burying' of a story by the MSM at a time when the internet wasn't able to really 'check' the system.
When it is brought back into the light people instantly dismiss it instead of looking into it.
Some things should be above politics. This isn't about conservative vs liberal. They want you to think it is though.- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -2/+9Yeah, for too many people, it they haven't seen it on TV dozens of time and if they haven't heard everyone around them talk about it seriously, then it cannot be true.
TV has much more power on people's minds than they are willing to admit.
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -2/+9Yeah, for too many people, it they haven't seen it on TV dozens of time and if they haven't heard everyone around them talk about it seriously, then it cannot be true.
- Shandooga, on 10/11/2007, -3/+12I believe it and I'm sure this isn't the worst of it.
- JimNtexas, on 10/11/2007, -16/+620 year old moonbattery.
- zebbie, on 10/11/2007, -0/+5so your denying any of that happend? cognitive dissonance in the face of evidence is moonbattery dude.
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2You need to put it in language he can understand, zebbie.
- graizur, on 10/11/2007, -2/+12Hey Internet, GUESS WHAT, Help each other become more involved and educated citizens! No one can do it alone!
Seriously. Wouldn't you? - Barbarino, on 10/11/2007, -17/+4digg should remove this crap from here.
- ryanhgqu, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8Wasn't Iran-Contra the biggest scandal of the 1980s?
- aedes, on 10/11/2007, -1/+34I thought this was complete bs too at first, but then I started doing some quick searching. looked up the two authors of the article, Paul M. Rodriguez, and George Archibald, and both seem to be reasonably well known investigative journalists. Since the washington times doesn't seem to have an archive section on their website, i wasn't able to see if this was a real article or not, but i've emailed them seeing if they can say that they actually published this. Just because I don't remember something happening, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -3/+7More on emule! Type: Conspiracy of silence
Franklin cover-up
John Decamp- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Dude, no one uses emule. It's not 1996 anymore.
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Just millions of people. There are many treasures there for those willing to spend the time.
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Dude, no one uses emule. It's not 1996 anymore.
- ISIfunded911, on 10/11/2007, -3/+7More on emule! Type: Conspiracy of silence
- DestroyFascism, on 10/11/2007, -3/+19Just the tip of Iceburg.........
- adma84, on 10/11/2007, -16/+2You are an idiot for posting this crap. Digg has become an arena to post sensationlist articles with no journalist backing. The ENQUIRER better watch out, DIGG is taking over there turf!
- m3t00, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2I thought Digg was more of a centralized place for posting links to anything on the Internet for comments. Why do people keep trying to impose standards and ethics on everyone who posts stuff? Don't like it? Bury it! Move along...
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Better yet, leave it alone and give other people a chance to decide for themselves.
- m3t00, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2I thought Digg was more of a centralized place for posting links to anything on the Internet for comments. Why do people keep trying to impose standards and ethics on everyone who posts stuff? Don't like it? Bury it! Move along...
- djrhettmc, on 10/11/2007, -2/+26I've read "Conspiracy of Silence" by John Decamp and it scared the ***** out of me. If HALF of what they claim is true, there is some SERIOUS MkULTRA type brainwashing going on. Everyone knows the MSM here is evil, but MAN! The kids of Nebraska have been raped by rich men for decades! Honestly I remember as a kid being told "Be a good boy, or you'll get sent to Boys Town." Who knew child molesters with enough money could rent a young kid for their own sick fantasy? Fascinating study of mind control, rape, drugs, and controlling the media. Read up. Make decisions yourself. Just watch out how vocal you are about the topic. Makes 9/11 Truthers seem rational.
- wakananda, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7If you go up to someone who's been in a serious automobile accident and calmly plant a suggestion in their mind - such as "at noon tomorrow, remove your left shoe" - they will do it, without knowing why, just as if they were hypnotized. This is because trauma creates a dissociative, "suggestible" mental state. Sexual abuse creates trauma, and dissociation, that can be used by an hypnotist to cultivate and control "alters" or alternate personalities. We are all familiar with the "amnesia" of remembering an interesting dream while we are in bed, but after brushing our teeth being unable to recall, try as we might, the dream we had just been remembering in detail, moments before. These same "walls of amnesia" are created by trauma, and used to separate personalities in mind-controlled subjects. A subject may be used to compromise a lawmaker sexually, in order to control them (the significance of the WA DC/Nebraska connection here); they may be used as an assassin (Manchurian Candidate); or the subject may be used as a courier, to orally deliver large volumes of information that they are not at any time consciously aware of. This body of technique has been passed down from ancient family traditions, studied systematically in Nazi death camps, and augmented electornically and chemically by modern intelligence community black projects. Because this is the information age (some would say the age of Aquarius), many things that have been kept tightly secret for eons are now common knowledge. As we see with this article, it is now impossible to bury bodies deeply enough - the cat is not only out of the bag: it's kittens have had kittens... Any given data can potentially be drawn from each fragment of the hologram (of the total information network). This is why people are getting stupider (no it's not your imagination; it's a -desperate- attempt on the part of a truly ancient secretive power-structure to cope with the disseminated intelligence increase occuring with new media). And this is also why preparations are being made for a totalitarian lock-down of free societies on the pretence of (manufactured) "emergency." How will Power re-invent itself in an age of fresh air, of crystalline transparency? How long will it postpone, not another remasking, but a true change of state?
- ScottooMc, on 10/11/2007, -6/+0WOW!!!!! Forget to take your pills? You should be locked up in a padded room!!! Very imaginative but this isn't the movies or a fictional book, this is real life. Crazy ***** happens every day but what your saying is so far fetched that I am concerned about your sanity.
- revolution1x, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Here's a PDF copy of John DeCamp's book, which I started reading a couple of months ago... Good stuff, haven't finished it yet though.
http://mediafire.com/?4elym11gjnq
- wakananda, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7If you go up to someone who's been in a serious automobile accident and calmly plant a suggestion in their mind - such as "at noon tomorrow, remove your left shoe" - they will do it, without knowing why, just as if they were hypnotized. This is because trauma creates a dissociative, "suggestible" mental state. Sexual abuse creates trauma, and dissociation, that can be used by an hypnotist to cultivate and control "alters" or alternate personalities. We are all familiar with the "amnesia" of remembering an interesting dream while we are in bed, but after brushing our teeth being unable to recall, try as we might, the dream we had just been remembering in detail, moments before. These same "walls of amnesia" are created by trauma, and used to separate personalities in mind-controlled subjects. A subject may be used to compromise a lawmaker sexually, in order to control them (the significance of the WA DC/Nebraska connection here); they may be used as an assassin (Manchurian Candidate); or the subject may be used as a courier, to orally deliver large volumes of information that they are not at any time consciously aware of. This body of technique has been passed down from ancient family traditions, studied systematically in Nazi death camps, and augmented electornically and chemically by modern intelligence community black projects. Because this is the information age (some would say the age of Aquarius), many things that have been kept tightly secret for eons are now common knowledge. As we see with this article, it is now impossible to bury bodies deeply enough - the cat is not only out of the bag: it's kittens have had kittens... Any given data can potentially be drawn from each fragment of the hologram (of the total information network). This is why people are getting stupider (no it's not your imagination; it's a -desperate- attempt on the part of a truly ancient secretive power-structure to cope with the disseminated intelligence increase occuring with new media). And this is also why preparations are being made for a totalitarian lock-down of free societies on the pretence of (manufactured) "emergency." How will Power re-invent itself in an age of fresh air, of crystalline transparency? How long will it postpone, not another remasking, but a true change of state?
- snooly, on 10/11/2007, -2/+27What's wrong with a twenty year old story? If you knew more relevant twenty year old stories, you would likely be a whole lot more informed about what is going on today.
- ZmannR2, on 10/11/2007, -6/+1because this 20 year old story is fake.....whack liberals look here ----> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_King
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Give us some substantial proof please ... sans the name calling.
Otherwise, you come off as nothing more than hateful and ignorant.
- iDragonFly, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Give us some substantial proof please ... sans the name calling.
- ZmannR2, on 10/11/2007, -5/+1thats right, digg me down for posting the truth
- THX1979, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4You posted a wikipedia link; I think it is a bit of a stretch to say that you have 'posted truth'.
- ZmannR2, on 10/11/2007, -6/+1because this 20 year old story is fake.....whack liberals look here ----> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_King
- Sendss, on 10/11/2007, -0/+10Yes it's an old story but it was never covered by the MSM. Maybe now with sites like digg the truth about this can come to light.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 107 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by