What is Digg?Sponsored by HTC
Who knows you better than your phone? view!
youtube.com - See you from the perspective of your phone.
61 Comments
- GeographyJoe, on 03/05/2009, -19/+34How about those Bush memos, superjerk? For all you worries about the make-believe tyranny of the Obama admin, I can't figure how you are silent on the great Dictator. We all know how you feel about dictators. wink wink. Good job pulling this partisan bs out of the trash bin, though. The "partisan swindle" as you call it. You're the expert.
Sane Peoples of Digg: Don't feed the wing nuts. They're angry, dangerous creatures. - ironhide, on 03/05/2009, -4/+18SuperCandy, please review the Digg TOS. Name-calling isn't against the TOS, however, section 5, article 9 might be of interest:
"with the intention of artificially inflating or altering the 'digg count', blog count, comments, or any other Digg service, including by way of creating separate user accounts for the purpose of artificially altering Digg's services; giving or receiving money or other remuneration in exchange for votes; or participating in any other organized effort that in any way artificially alters the results of Digg's services;" - freedomjoe, on 03/05/2009, -4/+18supercandy, I told you before that you didn't get banned for calling people names, so chill out. I'd have to agree with Geography here, because you tend to submit really partisan articles with misleading titles. This, from the NY Post, you submit under "news". It's quite simply inaccurate and since it happens a lot, people get tired of it.
- homercles337, on 03/05/2009, -18/+31Buried for inaccuracy and general asshattery.
- inactive, on 03/05/2009, -4/+16Sweetheart, it isn't stalking when you can see other articles dugg by you and your gang right above this article.
"People who Dugg this article also Dugg...." - freedomjoe, on 03/06/2009, -3/+15OH, god...are you serious?
"no one has ever done this with myself, it .." PLEASE for the love of god, learn some grammar, supercandy!
You copy and paste this nonsensical garbage and then, you throw in Castro!!!!! Are you for real, straw man? then you throw out "partisan" in every single post you made. I know the GOP loves that word, exp when they're guilty of something, but you throw it out right as you're displaying your utter lack of neutrality; indeed, your inability to grasp incoming facts.
You never did answer me about the "countries who long to be like America" over "socialism" that you've been to. You claimed "they" loved Bush and hated Clinton. LOL. where were you? - ironhide, on 03/06/2009, -3/+15Such a response :) I must be hitting pretty close to home there. For the record, none of us are gaming. Maybe if you and your minions submitted articles that weren't piles of slop, they might have a chance of staying on the front page for more than ten minutes.
- inactive, on 03/06/2009, -4/+15Considering his current legal difficulties, "Steal" was indeed correct.
- GeographyJoe, on 03/06/2009, -3/+14You have crossed the line into the truly certifiable. You're a troll of the highest order who repeats the same thing in comment after comment, just hoping to get a rise out of people.
You lecture on the TOS just a day after being banned yourself? Just like your party -- Hypocrite to the end. - freedomjoe, on 03/06/2009, -5/+15dude, I always spell Steele as Steal because he is under investigation for campaign finance fraud, so the joke is on you.
furthermore, you are not with any party? Give it a rest. You're a birther. You may not claim a party, but the psych ward owns you. - DaviDTC, on 03/07/2009, -1/+11I have a question for supercandy.
Is it that hard to make more than one sentence before starting a new paragraph?
Why does each sentence have to have its own line?
Just had that one question.
That is all.
I am not going to get into the party crap - inactive, on 03/06/2009, -3/+12Unless you are a wrestling fan, Mr. NWO, we can safely dismiss anything you have to say as the ravings of a paranoid delusional.
- inboxnews, on 03/05/2009, -23/+32That is (tragically) hilarious. Thanks for the post!
- freedomjoe, on 03/05/2009, -6/+13really? LOL. You must not have taken a look at the RNC lately. How's Steal working out for y'all?
- Falldog, on 03/07/2009, -2/+9I've said it before and I'll say it again, enough with the stupid "change" comments. How is anyone going to take you seriously when every anti-Obama comment includes some stupid play on his campaign motto to which you chuckle and carry on. It's as though his hatters have returned to the mindset of five year old who just heard the word poop.
- GeographyJoe, on 03/06/2009, -4/+11Supercandy's horrific grammar strikes digg again. Is this part of the Rushublican plan to dumb down America so they can get the votes again? LOL.
- JenniferInMO, on 03/05/2009, -29/+35Oh look, another Superfundie circle jerk.
Posting tabloid crap, ratcheting up the rhetoric in the title and summary then leaving stock partisan comments. Rush's self-appointed lackey.
Buried. - JenniferInMO, on 03/06/2009, -1/+6@SuperAss: I no one is stalking you. Your daily submissions scream out for mockery.
You submit asinine "partisan" blog posts, you comment in the summaries and the title and usually leave a good long rant which is entirely partisan in nature then you call others partisans in the same rant. You do this every day and it is extremely amusing.
You have no idea what you are doing, yet you do it with the fervor of some kind of revolutionary. It is hysterically funny to anyone who watches. And it is a delight to return to the days of playground trashing for a few moments during the day. No brain needed to respond to your comments because your comments are partisan, juvenile, simpleton nonsense.
Until you submit something serious or make a comment that requires the use of more brain cells than plankton you will continue to draw negative attention to yourself. In a word, you are an ass. - DaviDTC, on 03/07/2009, -2/+7wow when you get more bot spam than comments about your article you know you failed.
- JenniferInMO, on 03/06/2009, -3/+8I know you don't read news articles, but are you unaware that he is being investigated by the FBI for possible misuse of campaign funds? It was a clever little play on words. One which your Superfundie allowed to fly right over his wittle helmet.
- JenniferInMO, on 03/06/2009, -3/+7If you are going to make fun of someone's spelling might I suggest the following:
First, make sure it isn't a clever little word play, and
Second, you might want to clean up your own punctuation, else you will continue to look like an ass. - JenniferInMO, on 03/06/2009, -4/+8Superfundie, Nblsavage was not being sexist. He was being demeaning. Don't worry. It was quite appropriate.
And please tell me what the rule is. Am I supposed to hold my comments until you have fully played your game on the system and called in all of your followers? I'll tell you what, you just submit, shout, e-mail, script and bot yourself until you are happy then let me know when I am allowed to comment.
Btw: you still haven't looked up the word "partisan" yet, have you? You are really gonna feel like an ass when you do. - JenniferInMO, on 03/06/2009, -2/+6You must not have taken a look at the titles and summaries which you create in your submissions. You set the tone, Superfundie. We just respond in kind and on your level. It's fun too. It reminds me of playground trash talk.
- JenniferInMO, on 03/06/2009, -5/+8"Discussion"? Are you kidding me? Discuss with Mr. Partisan Superfundie? He submits trash, uses the title and the summary to make partisan comments, then leaves the first comment (always utilizing the word "partisan" at least twice), insults our President, pastes a few lies then shouts the stories out to his lackeys. He has no intention of discussing anything with anyone. I have never seen you do that either.
I am enjoying the hell out of your gaming the system and watching the mainstream Diggers point out the nonsense of it all.
Rush as your party leader, Superfundie as your Digg leader. Gee, you folks are rolling in it now. No one will ever take you all seriously unless and until you learn to deal in facts and care about the real problems our country faces instead of making up absurdities. - MoeWasHere, on 03/07/2009, -3/+6"Change is hypocrisy."
More like "Change is Irony." - DaviDTC, on 03/07/2009, -1/+3How come if I shoot someone in the face they don't have to apologize to me?
Big government gets away with everything. Stop complaining, both sides have their problems. - Murdats, on 03/07/2009, -0/+2Your weird grammar and writing style makes so much more sense if I read it as a badly constructed poem. it also makes it slightly humorous instead of depressing.
- novenator, on 03/07/2009, -0/+2supercandy, who are you really? You just joined digg, but you play it like a pro, so you are obviously someone who got banned, created a new account, and came back to troll again. Too bad you're such a partisan.
- inboxnews, on 03/05/2009, -13/+15Sadly, the investigation of Rangel was shelved a few weeks ago.
- angryfirelord, on 03/07/2009, -5/+7How come if I cheat on my taxes, I can go to jail and get a big audit, but these guys are let off the hook? The IRS sure as hell isn't going to buy the "TurboTax screwed up on me" excuse.
- inactive, on 03/07/2009, -3/+5I was having my taxes done last year and there was a Mexican guy at the next desk who declared $64 that he made in cash for some yard work. I think it is honest taxpayers like that guy that the Obama administration will harass, not wealthy democrat tax dodgers.
- Barbarino, on 03/07/2009, -2/+2What is inaccurate?
- inactive, on 03/07/2009, -2/+2'Once great' because Obama has ruined it in the last six weeks?
You have about as much credibility as a random insult generator. - Barbarino, on 03/07/2009, -2/+2Yes we can...
- supercandy, on 03/05/2009, -20/+18Rangel is one of the biggest crooks in Washington, perhaps only outdone by the Clintons, and yet Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats still let him run a Committee?
Nancy Pelosi promised to have Rangel investigated by last New Year !
as Hillary Clinton would say...
CACKLE CACKLE ! - inactive, on 03/07/2009, -3/+2Obama RAN on change. He named his nipples Hope and Change. It's only right that we point out what kind of change he is bringing and what it will do to this once-great nation.
- madtechnologist, on 03/07/2009, -2/+1Sorta like how the Libs made fun of Bush, eh? Yeah, it sucks when your guy is on the other end.
- Barackalypse, on 03/07/2009, -3/+2Eliminate the income tax and switch to a national sales tax, that will stop most of the cheating as sales taxes are much harder to avoid.
- inactive, on 03/07/2009, -3/+2That's a nice piece of fiction. Was that before or after you 'hurt your ankle.'
- inactive, on 03/07/2009, -5/+3LOL JenniferInMO commenting on "partisan comments". That's a laugh.
- Barackalypse, on 03/07/2009, -3/+1We say it because hypocrisy is the one sin even liberals seem to acknowledge, so in a morally relativistic world, the biggest slander you can throw at someone is "you say one thing, but do another".
- Barackalypse, on 03/07/2009, -3/+1Jen, why so serious, here's the same story from the US Treasury official website and CBS News, would you care to discuss the facts now or would you like to cast derogatory comments about these sources so you can avoid the issue?
<a class="user" href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/tg47.htm&quo ... rel="nofollow">http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/tg47.htm< ...
<a class="user" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/03/ap/cabst ... rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/03/ap/cabst ...</a> - Barackalypse, on 03/07/2009, -4/+1I tend to focus on the current threat, and frankly a twice elected, disgraced, and unpopular Federalist tyrant like Bush represents no further threat, however a wolf in sheep's clothing as President that we're stuck with for another 3 years and change is very dangerous.
- supercandy, on 03/06/2009, -5/+2LOL !
are you being as honest as Obama?
lies are always problematic, because they reveal a desperate vapidity.
more ugly childish games, psych ward?
this is nasty abuse of a Digg member again... - TheInformer, on 03/07/2009, -6/+3Funny watching people that bow at the altar of Huffingtonpost, Dailykos, and Mediamatters.org complaining about inaccuracy.
- supercandy, on 03/06/2009, -6/+2ass?
this is more childish abuse of a DIGG member.
you continue to stalk and demean in the most childish manner.
quite ugly. - pookydirt, on 03/05/2009, -16/+11Of course it was shelved. What do you want, transparency?
Obama's Platform of Opaqueness in action for ya. - NSResponder, on 03/07/2009, -8/+3Why so touchy, Jennifer? Sucks to be on the defensive, doesn't it?
-jcr -
Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is