What is Digg?Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate
Readers have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate.Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Check out new footage. view!
DragonAge.BioWare.com - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
370 Comments
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -15/+73This has been the worst presidency, rubber stamped by the Republican majority Congress for 7 years with 300 scandals (see: http://scandalist.info/ & here too http://www.netrootsmass.net/Hugh/Bush_list.html) & several indictments & even some Republican officials behind bars as we speak. Real smooth right wingers. Go to http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3011profile_ ... & http://www.peuplesmonde.com/article.php3?id_articl ... & educate yourself about neoconservatism.
- ubetchaiam, on 01/23/2008, -12/+63Amazing that the number could actually be calculated; I lost count looooong ago.
- dinsy, on 01/23/2008, -17/+65impeach now
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -13/+43As Hitler said:
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it"
Suckers... - MrEthiopian, on 01/23/2008, -12/+36Why is it that all news organizations including this outlet continue to dance around the truth? George Bush knowingly lied to get the rest of the country and world behind him for the run up to the war. George Bush lied and because of that lie over 3 thousand of our soldiers have been killed, over 100,000 Iraq kalians killed, innocent people tortured, billions of dollars spent on nothing, bankrupting this country with a war that he lied to get us into.
George Bush and Cheney should be impeached and then brought up on war crimes! - inactive, on 01/23/2008, -26/+48VERY URGENT: Inevitable - Nuclear War or Extreme Economic Meltdown
I invite you to look at my research which concludes that a Nuclear War or an Extreme Economic Meltdown is inevitable. In addition, my research proves that Bush has lied to the whole world, and, that allegations against Iran are false.
The Real Reasons Why Iran is the Next Target (not what they tell you on TV)
The reason why Bush wants to attack Iran is because they have stopped accepting US dollar as a payment for their oil in December 2007 and instead they want Euro. This is Iran's "Nuclear Weapon."
This is the exact same reason why we have invaded Iraq, because in 2000, Saddam Husein switched from USD to EUR.
William Clark "The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War in Iraq" January 2003
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html
William Clark "The Real Reasons Why Iran is the Next Target" 26 Oct 2004
http://www.energybulletin.net/2913.html
Krassimir Petrov "The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse" 17 Jan 2006
http://www.energybulletin.net/12125.html
Iranian Oil Bourse Timeline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Oil_Bourse
Russia: "Attack on Iran will be viewed by Moscow as attack on Russia."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ26Ak06. ...
Russia: "Moscow is ready to use force, including pre-emptively and with nuclear weapons, to defend itself."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7198181.stm
Result of the Extreme Economic Meltdown - HyperInflation: The Nightmare German Inflation
http://www.usagold.com/germannightmare.html
Nelson Hultberg "Apocalypse This Way Comes"
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/hultberg/ ... - khail250, on 01/23/2008, -6/+25there should be +1 crime for each individual soul lost because of the terrorist Bush. 15,000+ of my fellow soldiers, and the 600,000 innocent Iraqi.
his crimes exceed 600,000. Bush is worse than any terrorist out there.
FYI to my 15,000 soldiers, to include all that died outside combat, all that died due to mental disorders from PTSD, and suicides. - SheilaNoya, on 01/23/2008, -20/+37I'll give Bush credit for one thing - He has helped to kill the Republican party for many years to come. Americans are fed up with the lies, the unaccountability, the corruption, the incompetence, the arrogance, etc.
It's time to let the Democrats have a crack at restoring America to what it once was. - khail250, on 01/23/2008, -10/+26sadly some morons will still dig you down as spouting "liberal ***** with no facts".
- rnwen2750, on 01/23/2008, -3/+15I sincerely hope you are right, however, I do not believe that the democracy will be restored. Republicans are still very powerful and by distancing themselves from the Bush regime, may not be under as much scrutiny as they should.
- CeltiCowboy, on 01/23/2008, -5/+16I've noticed how every article on Digg lately critical of rightwingers has a "reported by diggers as possibly inaccurate" tag, while few, if any, critical of the left are so tagged - are there right wing Diggers moving quickly to try and discredit every report critical of the Republican candidates or the Bush administration? I mean, if so, I'm not really surprised, but remember, just because an article has been reported as "possible inaccurate," doesn't mean it IS inaccurate - just that someone (or several someones) disagree with it.
- Waskonator, on 01/23/2008, -18/+28"I Pledge A Grievance,
To The Flag Of The United States Of America,
and To The Republicans Whom I Can't Stand,
One Nation, Under Smog, Indispicable,
With Liberty for Just US not all." - paku, on 01/23/2008, -5/+15Bush family member involved in a war? No...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush
The pattern is right in front of your eyes. All you have to do is read. - Digger1123, on 01/23/2008, -2/+11This is the kind of hate that America doesn't need. There is no way to justify murdering someone.
- flave, on 01/23/2008, -4/+13Ugh, if you are going to mark it as inaccurate, you could at least have the balls to say why. It was originally reported by the AP so you can't discount rawstory for covering it, and both TFIJ and publicintegrity.org are nonpartisan non-profit groups. Tell me where the bias is in this?
- TopherT, on 01/23/2008, -2/+10How many Americans died because of Jimmy Carter?
- Lucas123, on 01/23/2008, -4/+12Bye, bye.
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 01/23/2008, -4/+12Can we store them at your house? Cool!
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -5/+12Kucinich is bringing it to the table. Vote it up when you see it.
- swrostmore, on 01/23/2008, -3/+10That quote is Goebbels, referring to Churchill as a liar.
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 01/23/2008, -4/+11Your parents must be thrilled that you're finally leaving the nest. Don't rush back!
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 01/23/2008, -2/+9googling some ***** != research
- random19, on 01/23/2008, -0/+7*SPOILER*
They won't do any better. - statik99, on 11/03/2009, -17/+24Anyone that marks these articles as innacurate are puppets of the corporate media and need to get their head out of the sand! These articles aren't innacurate. It's a fact Bush lied and often.
- Pake, on 01/23/2008, -1/+7I wish I could live in this fairly tale land where one party wasn't corrupt, but sadly I don't. Only a handful of members from each side truly care about the people and do the job, while the rest just figure out how what lies they need to produce to win the next election.
- freezeout, on 01/23/2008, -2/+8"just remember, it's not a lie if you believe it." -George Costanza
- banmaster, on 01/23/2008, -1/+7Whats even greater is when people use the 'reply' function.
- TopherT, on 01/23/2008, -5/+11How many lives is this war worth? At what point do the hundreds of thousands of deaths racking up equal genocide? How many have to die for the lie of weapons of mass destruction? Is 200,000 really more acceptable than 600,000?
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -9/+15Old canisters of mustard gas? Fail.
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -2/+8My bad, the AP is ideologically pure, have no history of working with terrorists, and are completely agnostic to American & World politics. They are just innocent and objective bystanders to this thing we call "life". Journalists are the purist of the pure.
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -6/+12read my research to understand
- masterm1nd, on 01/23/2008, -6/+12No, I am interested in ONLY the facts. I have yet to see the proof they knew what they said was false. I don't think you would want Bush to convict you of treason based on one of your many comments that turned out to be false. You guys have lost your way in that people are not innocent until proven guilty anymore. I just proved the the study false with my links. Something tells me you aren't going to accuse the study or rawstory of lying. This is one big confirmation bias *****. Bush had a confirmation bias on Iraq. You guys have a confirmation bias on Bush. And I have a confirmation bias on everyone being retarded.
- masterm1nd, on 01/23/2008, -1/+7If you think the blowjob was the impeachable offense then you shouldn't be commenting.
- banmaster, on 01/23/2008, -3/+9So, um, who left the current administration a record surplus that has since been pissed away by Bush and his crime buddies??
- Wargalas, on 01/23/2008, -1/+7Never said that. I'm saying that hiding your backers leaves your conclusions as questionable.
- georgemason01, on 01/23/2008, -1/+7Warning: The Content in this Comment May be Inaccurate
- lucutus, on 01/23/2008, -1/+6Strange this had over 50 bury hits within a minute of getting popular.Check it out here http://ajaxonomy.com/buryrecorder/ This message is for all the doubters. If you say this is inaccurate because of the source you should know this story is even on FOX http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,324753,00.html
Why would anyone call this SPAM and bury it for that? - masterm1nd, on 01/23/2008, -3/+8Ok guys, you are misinterpreting me. Bush made false statements. That is provable. Every other politician makes false statements. That is provable. My problem lies in saying they are intentional lies without evidence to prove it. That is not defending they guy. It is the same exact concept of Bush crying WMD without the evidence to prove it. Do you see the irony and hypocrisy, or am I really crazy. I just don't get whats so evil about asking for proof of claims and suspending judgment until I see the proof.
- masterm1nd, on 01/23/2008, -2/+7Even if what you say is true, it doesn't change this fact: "Its claim was 10 times higher than consensus estimates of the number of war dead."
- sizzzzlerz, on 01/23/2008, -2/+7And now rubber-stamped by the Democrats in the form of Pelosi and Reid as well.
- Wargalas, on 01/23/2008, -0/+5First off, thank you for your service. That being said, it's one thing to throw your hands up in surrender, it's another to actually stay and do something about it. Leaving your home because things aren't going "your way" is a cowards way out.
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -3/+8Interesting that...
"Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."
...for those of you too impatient to read let me highlight...
"on the basis of erroneous information" means that these "lies" were regurgitations of "erroneous information". The proof is in whether or not the erroneous information was actually "propagated" by the Bush Administration.
To prove this, you must prove that the Bush Administrations has tight control over MI5 and other world wide intelligence organizations.
But if you say that these statements are lies based on "erroneous information" then you must also conclude that all of your Democratic Senators and Congressmen who also believed this "erroneous information" and supported the war in its initial stages were also liars and guilty of the same crimes. - swrostmore, on 01/23/2008, -2/+7Soros forced Bush to lie 900 times with his mind control ray too, right?
- inactive, on 01/23/2008, -6/+11How about Bush admitting there weren't any WMDs? Got a snappy comeback for that one Bingo?
- jamesallen74, on 01/23/2008, -4/+9What the hell is this "Warning: The Content in this Article May be InaccurateReaders have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate" crap?
- basichuman, on 01/23/2008, -4/+9Not only has Bush been consistently lying to us, he's pardoning himself and his administration from any possible crimes related to the torture of detainees. http://digg.com/politics/Bush_pardons_himself
What a great guy. - hambend, on 01/23/2008, -2/+7It's a valid question, except that it was already answered in cageybee's second link. Iran has been making euro-denominated oil transactions since 2003, and were negotiating to make such transactions for some time before that. Only last month did they stop accepting USD transactions altogether. I can understand not bothering to read through that many links, but then maybe you shouldn't bother to reply either.
Not that I want to be seen siding with davefish. People who think the world divides cleanly into left and right bug me no end. - Dante1969, on 01/23/2008, -3/+8935? feels low
- DaniDives, on 01/23/2008, -3/+8I believe Stephen King commented in Time Magazine a few years ago that the one thing he wants to see before he dies is Bush tried for war crimes against humanity.
- poppieprong, on 01/23/2008, -5/+10FACT: Mustard gas was used in World War I. FACT: Atom bombs were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. I guess, then, that an invasion of Europe and the United States are in order.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 370 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is