What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Follow the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Twitter view!
twitter.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
113 Comments
- JoanDark, on 05/09/2008, -3/+57Thank you, NYT, and thank you for remembering that you (saw fit to) endorse her.
The "hard-working white voters" is the last straw.
(Actually, for me the "MISSPEAKING" about Bosnia was the last straw.Excuse me--misspeaking is saying you went to Bosnia TUESDAY when you went THURSDAY.
But telling a whole , long , involved (lie) tale?)
I dont want this person for my President.
Yeah, I want change.
And although I am a hard-working white voter, I wouldnt vote for HER with a 10 foot pole. - Surferess, on 05/09/2008, -3/+55As an HRC supporter, I did yesterday make a huge change. I made Obama my friend.
I also am dropping my former position and doing what is best for the party. If you other Dems will still have me.
Go Obama! *somebody get me a t shirt!* - GhostWithToast, on 05/09/2008, -0/+34Plus, it would be really difficult to vote with a 10 foot pole.
- aussiejan, on 05/09/2008, -4/+27The Democratic Party should have slapped her back hard the first time she and Bill made their (not so) subtle comments about race. From where I'm sitting, every time she does it, it's as if she is pointing to Barack Obama and saying "White people won't vote for him". I am now convinced she and Bill are racists.
- dinot, on 05/09/2008, -6/+26Thank you for putting party before candidate. We need more people like you.
- Bilabrin, on 05/09/2008, -2/+19"The undeclared superdelegates should stop their coy posing. With few exceptions, there is no reason left (other than the hope of making back-room deals) for those whose states have voted to keep their positions private. The rest should state their allegiance as soon as their primaries are held in the next few weeks." '
I've been screaming that for weeks.
Finally these undecided superdelgates are being exposed for their selfish actions. They want to parlay their kingmaker status in exchange for favors. - neognostic, on 05/09/2008, -1/+16Welcome friend!
- BeforeSputnik, on 05/09/2008, -4/+19And I'll do it again. I don't want that woman anywhere near the White House, and anyone who suggests the idea should be dragged out to the street and shot.
- shaka999, on 05/09/2008, -2/+13Having her on the ticket AT ALL would be a huge negative to me. She needs to go away ....
- Macrophage, on 05/09/2008, -4/+13I certainly Hope, that after all Hillarious has done and said, that NY now clearly sees who they elected as one of their two Senators. I, as a former New Yorker, born and raised in Brooklyn in 1952, certainly do NOT want her as Senator. I hope is the vast majority of New York no longer ants her either...we have faced enought embarassment already..with the Governor spectacle PLEASE sent her and Slick Willy home to Arkansas on into history..just another bad memory. PEACE John From Cape Cod, Ma.
- thescimitar, on 05/09/2008, -1/+10wtf? This isn't England. We DON'T vote for parties, we vote for individuals. The whole damned reason half this country can't speak civilly to the other half is precisely because we've divided our culture into an "us versus them" mindset. I don't vote Democrat, I don't vote Republican, I vote for whomever I think would get the job done and who has a decent plan to put in action.
This sort of commentary just ensures that we'll have more of the same divisive ***** until November, except now instead of hating themselves, Democrats and Republicans will hate each. Super. Awesome. We need more people to vote responsibly, not people who vote to abdicate responsibility. Bah! - BeforeSputnik, on 05/09/2008, -1/+10or dugg down, whichever suits your taste.
- redcolumbine, on 05/09/2008, -5/+14She thinks nothing of running her own party into the ground so that McCain can win and she can oppose him (possibly as an independent) in 2012. Lousy strategy, worse tactics, and entirely too much like Bush/Cheney in her desperation to grab power.
- bitfreak, on 05/09/2008, -4/+12It boggles the mind at the effort it takes to go from Democratic Royalty and having a premium brand name (Clinton) to being the party albatross. She's burning her bridges at an increasing rate, and the Clinton legacy is vaporizing faster than a water drop on a New York sidewalk in summer. I'm going to have to put my Mom (big HRC supporter) on suicide watch.
- frankingeneral, on 05/09/2008, -2/+10How are you going to say this article is slanted. 4 months ago the the very same Editorial Board that wrote this article endorsed Hillary Clinton, clearly if they're being harsh towards Clinton it's not out of bias, but out of honesty.
- NyteStarNyne, on 05/09/2008, -3/+11Get this guy a chicken dinner. Stat
- inactive, on 05/09/2008, -2/+10Hillary needs to GTFO.
- cogitocogito, on 05/09/2008, -1/+8Hillary will stay in the race as long as the donations come in. She lent her campaign money and wants it back.
- humperdinck, on 05/09/2008, -0/+7You can clearly not choose the wine in front of you.
- frankingeneral, on 05/09/2008, -0/+7We're glad to have you, and bring all your other HRC friends. The Obama bandwagon has plenty of room!
- zepher5150, on 05/09/2008, -1/+8Desperate actions by a desperate person. Really disappointing is what it is.
Obama re-actions shows again the class and integrity that is going to make him a great President.
Obama 08 - shaka999, on 05/09/2008, -2/+8Yes, but are you college educated? If so your not part of her demographic.....
- MxM111, on 05/09/2008, -2/+8I am Clinton supporter. I still am. I do think if today Obama drops out of race (not gonna happen) then democratic party will have better chance to win the election. But that's not the point.
In my mind it is much more worrisome if McCain wins then the small differences (compared to McCain) between Obama and Clinton. So what possible REAL options do we have
1) Clinton drops today
2) Clinton fights and wins
3) Clinton fights and loses.
Out of these 3 options the option #3 is definitely worse than option #1. At this point, however, I think that even if option 2 is realizable, the all negativity campaigning that will happen will create such a schism in democratic party and people who would have voted otherwise for democrats, that even if TODAY Clinton has chance to win, she probably will not have such chance if she continues to fight up to convention, which will be really ugly fight.
So, when I compare all 3 options, I see that option #1 (Clinton drops) is the best option if democrats want to win.
It is time to stop fighting and heal the wounds. - frankingeneral, on 05/09/2008, -1/+6Just stop reading this crap.
- alphaterminus, on 05/09/2008, -3/+8Trailer Trash for Hillary!
- Vizerai, on 05/09/2008, -0/+5Since she can't win, she's trying to make sure Obama won't win either. Great attitude; this really shows what kind of leader she is.
- citizenchan, on 05/09/2008, -1/+6Papi IDIOT Pablo
- dinot, on 05/09/2008, -0/+5Um, your argument only applies if we're STILL voting with no clear winner. That's not the case.
You're comparing apples and oranges. See, if Hillary and Obama were of two different parties competing to lead a country, then you would be correct in putting individuals over party. But what we're doing right now is electing a leader of THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. And I'm a democrat. And her supporters are democrats.
It was a good race, but it's over now. Time to put aside our differences and come together as a PARTY. - kipmartin, on 05/09/2008, -0/+5Get The Foreign Oil?
Give The French Ozone?
Go To Freakin Outback? - kipmartin, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5apparently many are still digging you down, Ms. I-Said-It-First!
- vexingmodstwo, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5Funny, isn't it? I get a good laugh every time I read this stuff. Had a "VRWC" person said this stuff about Hillary a mere 18 months ago, these very same people would be defending her.
- plhearn, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5The last straw? Like you were gonna vote for her before that.
- RebeL5K, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5Thank you frankingeneral. Why is that people think that everything published from a news source is supposed to be unbiased? This wasn't a story, it was an EDITORIAL...by the EDITORIAL board. The same board that endorsed her for President 4 months ago! Was that not biased? Of course it was, it was a ***** opinion, just as this is.
- RebeL5K, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4I think more so they are just scared of voting for the wrong candidate or helping to seal the nomination now and getting backlash in November. The majority of House delegates are undecided, which are also ALL up for re-election in November. If any of them come forward now to seal the deal for Obama, her supporters WILL remember it in November, just as they have threatened to vote for McCain, and for those democrats in swing or close districts they need all the democratic turnout they can get. But ultimately, yeah, it is selfish, just for another reason.
- mythicflux, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4All I want from a election is an end to the Clinton/Bush dynasties. There was a reason that our country was founded on the idea of no kings or royal families.
- jankind, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5Man, Digg needs a section for people who bitch when extremely relevant topics make the front page.
- hayzeus, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4This is Digg, so the shirt will be wet.
- nazbot, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5This is garbage.
If the positions were reverse I would be disappointed that Obama didn't win, but I would also concede that the race was over. Furthermore, if Obama was doing what Clinton is doing I would quickly stop thinking he was a good candidate. It would become very obvious he was in it for himself vs. in it for the American people. - YodaJones, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3The New York Times sucks balls. Nobody cares about your opinion.
- inactive, on 05/09/2008, -1/+4She sounded like Miss Teen South Carolina in that phone statement...i was waiting for her to say "such as"...
- randyzaia, on 05/09/2008, -7/+10All you left-wingers are starting to see why us members of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" despised her so much in the first place.
- RebeL5K, on 05/09/2008, -1/+4Exactly - we need to have our nation's leader chosen by those who cannot manage their own finances or get accepted into a college. Working them farms has taught them a lot about what it takes to run a country.
- UberNick, on 05/09/2008, -3/+6"but she is light years better than any of the last 3 or 4 republican candidates"
It is really fair to base your standards on the bottom of the barrel? - brianjlowry, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3She has been pretty much eliminated mathematically. I'm not sure if 2) is even an option unless the superdelegates all back Clinton (which won't happen).
- frankingeneral, on 05/09/2008, -1/+4I think things are getting pretty ugly now for Hill-dawg...as if it wasn't enough that superdelegates have been jumping ship, and that the math doesn't really add up anymore, now one of the most widely read editorialy pages in the country, who endorsed Clinton back in January, are basically sounding the bell for her to surrender.
Hopefully she listens. Although I wouldn't be surprised if she turns around tomorrow and calls the Times a left-wing rag...I really don't know what to expect from her anymore. She's a few more lies and racist remarks away from entering The Tyson Zone in my book. It's almost surreal watching her fall so hard. - kemp34, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3Hillary would rather see McCain win than Obama. That would give her a chance to win in 2012, while if Obama were in office, she would have no chance to unseat the Democratic incumbent. If Obama wins, Hillary is done for good. If McCain wins, she can come back in 2012. Isn't this obvious by now?
- BigW, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3Its just a flesh wound!!!!
- alittleroy101, on 05/09/2008, -1/+3GTFO
- frankingeneral, on 05/09/2008, -1/+3Dugg for reason and common sense...
- randyzaia, on 05/09/2008, -2/+4waah waah waah your candidate is done
-
Show 51 - 100 of 114 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is