7 Comments
- COMPACTION, on 10/12/2007, -4/+6Scholars all over the place disagree with the 911 official reports. It was an inside job.
- RogerStrong, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3By using the same standard of proof - ignoring all the evidence including thousands of independant observers and film crews, and flat out making up claims (like the claim about a lack of wreakage) - you can prove that the World Trade Center never even existed.
- RogerStrong, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4Many civil engineers, metals experts, fire experts, etc. - from all over the world, not just the U.S. - have investigated 9/11 for themselves and debunk the conspiracy theorists.
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
Scroll down to near the bottom, to the section "Peer reviewed papers and articles on how the towers collapsed." - NYCTV, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1Of course this story is about corrections on the errors and omissions in the report as well as request for information to an investigation that has not concluded. The peanut gallery here has already cast their stones without even a final report and even when most investigators within the government claim they were lied to making the reports. It is a sad world to see such rabid dogs pre-ejaculating. Let's hope that one day a real murder investigation will occur out of those 3000+ murders that day in NYC.
- Ringwind, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1Google Search: The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects
- BT1000101, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2I could understand all of these nutjob conpiracy ***** if we were talking about somebody pushing home video or super 8 footage of a Sasquatch, but we are talking about a LIVE EVENT here! Were all of you conspiracy nutjobs ***** stoned when the ***** hijacked planes hit the ***** towers?
- Ringwind, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1No Big Boeings Crashed
Google Search: (NBB) by Morgan Reynolds


What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved