What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
Geek Squad employee sings for Best Buy in holiday campaign. view!
youtube.com/bestbuy0 - Valerie DeAngelo explains the moment she got the casting call.
66 Comments
- virtualk, on 10/11/2007, -15/+42Ron Pual 2008!! Hope for America!
Registered Republicans must vote in the Primarys for Dr. Paul! - wakeupyouidiots, on 10/11/2007, -14/+37Ron Paul CAN win!
Join meetup.com to get involved with the Ron Paul campaign.
There are thousands of us on the march and we are forming everywhere.
We must take back this country. The Constitution calls for it!
It is the right of the people to abolish the government and start anew. Get involved now! - Darel99, on 10/11/2007, -12/+30Hi, I also favor Paul's straight talk.
Good news: Paul won a major NH straw poll last Saturday.
More good news: Our group has grown from 4 people from the first debate and this past week we had 103 people who attended on Tuesday. As of today I'm told we have 12 new republican registered voters who were democrat and our group is dedicated to raising $50,000 before the middle of Sept. Most of the visitors are not online but our next group meeting willl start our Ron Paul meet up group with my laptop. - ThreeFatSykos, on 10/11/2007, -13/+26Yes agreed , Vote ron paul his fruits of labors are pretty sweet!
R P .com2008
Be aware please and stay informed PLEASE!
We Can Do It! - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -8/+20So we're under threat of attack by terrorists, and by our own country.
All the while our huge deficit spending is threatening to destroy our economy...and what do we get for all this?
The ability of a few to remain in power at all costs. How very lovely! - Dam6e, on 10/11/2007, -4/+14I dugg you up.... I agree
- Rsardinia, on 10/11/2007, -7/+16One of the greatest things about this man is he isn't afraid of scaring the people with the truth, but rather give us the truth about the horrible situation we are in, and trying to attack the problem head on. No *****.
- shootdashit, on 10/11/2007, -0/+8great job. my friends and other from myspace are meeting tonight to put on a fund raiser show here in tampa to raise some more dough for him. i'm democrat, as well as my friends, but we all see the same thing here. Ron Paul in 2008.
- Constitution1st, on 10/11/2007, -1/+8That's because Ron Paul and his supporters (like me) actually believe the Constitution to be the supreme law of the land, whereas Ghouliani believes that he can manipulate people using fear by referring to 911, not to mention the millions he has profited from 911 in the form of speaking engagements.
- TruthWillWin, on 10/11/2007, -0/+6
if the americans continue to be gullible, neo-con media propaganda swallowing, dumb *****, they are going to desereve everything hellish that's on their way to them.
the U.S. is being brought down HARD by the NWO. And personally i've developed some kind of satisfaction to see that happen to the dumb ***** who are so easily fooled by the super-rich elites who own everything.
"People deserve the government they get, and they deserve to get it good and hard !!"
~ Timothy Moultrie
so true !!!!, and unfortunatly i'm almost wishing it would happen faster, instead of "the frog in the pan principle".
give the U.S. people what they deserve NWO!! (that will sure as hell open their eyes.) - Noureddin, on 10/11/2007, -1/+7Ron Paul 2008!
Too many morons that can't wake up still though. Attacking RP, AJ(Alex Jones) and so on.
Too many people still need to wake up. Sadly if Ron Paul does win in 2008. Or runs or whatever. They(CIA, FBI, Dem's Rep, Over all... "They" counts as Freemasons. The people who want the Anti Christ to come and so much other sick disturbing strange stuff.)will kill Ron Paul like "They" did with JFK, Malcolm X, King Jr.(In short) and so much more.
But, If people don't wake up. So much stuff bad will happen and America will be eaten from the inside-out. - JohnFive, on 10/11/2007, -0/+5The problem with your argument is that you think rights are derived from being a women for example. That is not the case, everyone is created equal!
- Amin001, on 10/11/2007, -3/+8ron paul has already gave examples of gulf of tonkin and operation ajax on the congress floor so i dont think its wrong to assume that is what he is thinking
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+6It's ok man...Dr. Paul supports equal Rights for gays too.
- ViciousDotOrg, on 10/11/2007, -4/+9I think I need to watch V for Vendetta again...wait... no, no I don't. I don't need to be reminded of an inevitable truth.
- dshPls, on 10/11/2007, -4/+8Here: http://digg.com/political_opinion/Ron_Paul_U_S_In_Great_Danger_Of_Staged_Terror
There was already a discussion and the Digg community buried the story. - Hortnon, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4Hey, V didn't get the vixen in the end, remember?
- Godwhacker, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5If you paid attention to what Paul says, rather then just trash him every chance you get, you would know that Paul supports equal rights for all Americans. The Constitution says nothing about Marriage, so he would leave that to the people and the states. He has also said that Don't Ask, Don't Tell should be revised. He wants disruptive sexual behavior baned from the military no matter if it's gay or straight, but doesn't agree with discharging people who have no performance related problems.
In my book, that is better than any support of gay rights being offered by the Democrats. - TheN0ble, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Only God or Ron Paul can save us.
- dshPls, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5"and the right to choose to abort regardless of what the husband wants?"
You're advocating women should HAVE to carry a child for 9 months if their husband wishes, then give birth? It's not the husbands body. Sure he should have some say, but in the end the women's body is hers alone. - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Well that seals it. I hadn't fully made up my mind about Ron Paul yet, I was still considering the possibility that he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. But now that I see how much you, the world's most obvious CIA shill, hate news about him being circulated so much, I'm joining his campaign. Chant with me everyone "Viva Ron Paul, viva the constitution, down with dshPls and other CIA pricks!" :D
- readytodie, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3http://prisonplanet.com/audio/130707paul.mp3
- Herostratus, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3GO BURY BRIGADE!
GO ***** YOUR MOMS! - FyreGoddess, on 10/11/2007, -7/+9Not to mention how the 2 at the end of the URL denotes that this article already existed and got buried...
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3We are *****, but at least we can enjoy the dream while it lasts. Viva Ron Paul!
- JonForTheWin, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2>If 9/11 was a false flag operation, we need to answer by who and how.
If you knew what the ***** you were talking about, you'd know Alex does EXACTLY that. Which you simply don't.
Just ***** Google it. - abitarecatania, on 10/11/2007, -2/+4Ron Paul at Google:
http://www.justin.tv/ronpaul/7733 - Nothlit, on 10/11/2007, -2/+4I like Ron Paul as much as the next digger, but seriously -- that URL makes no sense. Or maybe you just assumed everyone would figure out that "R P .com2008" really means "ronpaul2008.com"?
- diablo75, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I'm voting for Ron Paul, but I'm burying this post as inaccurate. Ron Paul was talking about blowback, not false flag operations.
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/11/2007, -7/+8More like communists use the words "the people": as a justification for their acts, and yet they screw it worse than anyone else.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4wow! Junkyarddawg!!
I just had to digg you up on that one. A new record! Thanks for not letting your dislike for Paul get in the way of your reasoning.
:) - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3Like, the corporate media news you mean? No, I'll just stick to the actual recording of the interview itself as a valid source, (which is linked in the article).
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2If Ron Paul doesn't win the primaries, can we count on you to help abolish the government through other means?
- Constitution1st, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2Thanks for pointing that out dippus *****, I'll go digg that one too!
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3If you listened to the mp3, Alex said "Congressman just out of the gate Cindy Sheehan yesterday on my show went further than anybody's ever gone she said [there's a] distinct chance of staged terror attack or the government allowing that to happen, Bush is saying he doesn't care what the people want the war will continue, they set up the military commisions act, they've set up the John Warner defense authorization act, he signed PDD51 making himself literally dictator (eg?) he quote gave himself that power, how much danger are we in now with the homeland security head feeling in his gut we're about to be hit, Republican minnows saying they need terror attacks, they need Al Qae'da to hit us to be able to continue the war, top military strategists saying it, how much danger are we in of some new gulf of Tonkin provocation?"
To which RP responded "I think we're in great danger of it, we're in danger in many ways..." etc, as written in the article already. I agree Alex's question, speech, or whatever you want to call is was not very clear at all, but Ron did sound to me as if he was agreeing that we are in danger of either a staged or an allowed attack, (probably on the troops in Iraq), in order to justify an attack on Iran. RP answered as a politician always does, going off on tangents as if they help support the point when they are simply designed to distract and get soundbytes in such that the "heard answer" and the "quotable answer" are not the same. (For example, bringing up the economy did not help to make a point, and was simply done as a soundbyte).Ron can claim "out of context" if anyone holds him to it, (since in context his statement was not coherent), thus anyone applying any coherency to it would be changing it's [lack of] meaning. No offense to Ron or his fans here, this is an extremely common habit among politicians. Those who don't develop it, never succeed in politics. I'm not sure if this was true back when logic was still taught in schools, (which we're supposed to believe they removed for no reason at all, or maybe because it's a "useless" skill). - Hortnon, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3So...you're saying he just wants to dodge every issue? I agree, he does.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3dshPls
Records are being broken in this post. First I actually dugg up junkyarddawg and now you!
On top of your well reasoned comment I would add that if abortions were made illegal we would most likely see "baby factories" where women would be sent to in order to be forced to carry full term. And if a woman were to intimate that they wanted to abort they would be sent to jail for it. Illegal abortions would be a slippery slope, especially with today's technology that has the ability to totally screw us over. - Junkyarddawg, on 10/11/2007, -4/+4Except when it comes to military service or marriage.
- scrabcat, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1what does this mean????
- Akaji, on 10/11/2007, -4/+4Women's rights - such as the right to her ex-husband's cash, sole rights to the child that they had together, and the right to choose to abort regardless of what the husband wants?
- Hortnon, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2I like how him pointing out that this is clearly a duplicate story, it makes him a CIA shill.
Doesn't take much. Don't worry, Julio, the world IS out to get you. - Hortnon, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2That's 2 of yours I've Dugg up today. I don't like where this is going.
- dshPls, on 10/11/2007, -7/+7SPAM SPAM SPAM & Finally, SPAM.
http://digg.com/political_opinion/Ron_Paul_U_S_In_Great_Danger_Of_Staged_Terror - Cerialthriller, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2so then, what is the difference if a guy marries another guy or another woman? They are both equal right?
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -7/+5YES MY BROTHER!!!
- polyGone, on 10/11/2007, -8/+6http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=afjq9WCz.Zy8&refer=home
Of course the bubble will burst. You can't have a sustainable economy with a system based on perpetual growth. - chopenik, on 10/11/2007, -10/+8Looks like we're about to get hit from all sides.
- zweben, on 10/11/2007, -21/+19The comments here reek of spam.
And I like Ron Paul, but... burried. - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -11/+9RP was responding to a comment, or series of comments, that included Jones mentioning a staged terror attack. Dr. Paul was saying that we are in great danger of a terror attack, not meaning to say that it would be a "false flag" attack. He was talking generally about the situation.
This is the biggest peeve I have with Alex Jones. He'll take something that someone says and twist to make it something that it's not. - theblueprint, on 10/11/2007, -5/+2If you're denouncing "CIA pricks", make sure you don't leave me out.
And incidentally, if you truly believe the ***** you're shoveling, you were going to vote for Paul anyway. He's the paranoid "truth"-douche candidate of choice. -
Show 51 - 66 of 66 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is