What is Digg?8 Comments
- Jimmyb207, on 01/09/2008, -1/+3There is absolutely no proof that Ron Paul is a racist. Your story is old and you are irritating.
- XxtraLarGe, on 01/09/2008, -0/+2O.K., I'm a Ron Paul blogger, donor & volunteer. I don't see any way in which Ron Paul's 5th place in the "Live Free or Die" state (way below expectation) can be spun into a victory.
- cocreator10, on 01/10/2008, -0/+2 Paul came in #2 at the caucus in my two townships in Iowa. Aldding a meeting at that location a third township had him a close #3 Huckabee damn near tied Rudy for last.
- Corrosionx, on 01/09/2008, -1/+3Ron Paul is an obscure candidate (thanks to MSM) and this racist rumor you're referring to is even more obscure. Nobody even knows about this outside of the Internet and left-wing extremists trying to smear the guy.
I suspect electoral fraud, but I would've suspected that even if Ron Paul wasn't in the race to begin with. Electronic voting machines have been untrustworthy ever since they showed up. - Corrosionx, on 01/11/2008, -0/+1That's the biggest percentage a libertarian candidate for president ever had.
- Minarchian, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1One way to look at it is that among the total votes for IA and NH Paul is actually 4th. I know delegates are what matters. But even with the obvious vote rigging going on Paul is 4th in total votes.
- inactive, on 01/09/2008, -1/+1Thank you.
- inactive, on 01/09/2008, -8/+2Ron Paul is a proven racist and it's good to see that America is rejecting him in every state. Only a Ron Paul supporter could call the utter trouncing he has received in every caucus and primary as victories. It sure explains why they think spammed internet polls actually should be interpreted as victories. No matter how many times this article is posted as well.
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is