What is Digg?8 Comments
- Corrosionx, on 11/07/2007, -0/+2Drastic changes like my money stopping devaluating would be nice.
- ncairns, on 11/06/2007, -0/+2I guess as soon as he stops winning all the Republican primary polls.
- johnny2k, on 11/06/2007, -0/+1@ nerdyy, I hope you realize I am doing my best to SPREAD THE WORD!
Oh, and by the way, you may find some people out there that will argue about "this is a democracy". Last I heard, we have a Republic. And it scares me to know that our youth is taught about the "democratic" process of electing our representatives.
And should Dr, Ron Paul win the election, are you ready for "a drastic change"? (that question is still being directed at 'nerdyy'). I'm not sure most Americans are ready for any drastic changes. The good news is that if Paul wins, Hillary loses, and we won't have to go through those DRASTIC CHANGES. I am beginning to believe that the GOP has to nominate somebody that CAN defeat Hillary or else.... well, it won't be the same country that we all know and love. - nerdyy, on 11/08/2007, -2/+2This is a democracy. Our government needs a drastic change. Ron Paul is the man to do this.
Ron Paul '08!!!
spread the word - johnny2k, on 11/06/2007, -2/+2I am getting to the point where I am going to favor anyone with an 'R' somewhere by their name, even if it stands for RINO! Okay, the whole point being is that there needs to be someway to DEFEAT Hillary. I do believe it, folks, that for every dollar that Ron gets, it is one dollar less that Hillary, Barack, or Edwards gets.
We are all finding out how money moves campaigns and politics. I wish it wasn't that way, but it is. In this case, it could be to our great advantage!
But let me get back to the point, as I digressed. Defeating Hillary really needs to be the ultimate goal of the GOP. We need a top-notched candidate to even have a chance. Ilana Mercer and others have written about Ron Paul's electability. Look for a campaign from the left that attacks Ron Paul. However, they'll be painting themselves into a corner, won't they? How are they going to attack somebody that also supports getting out of Iraq? Not that I am for a meaningless retreat, because I am not. But, what I do want, is an honorable withdrawal as we win that war in Iraq. In the mean time, by Ron Paul's inauguration in 2009, we could have succeeded in our objectives there, and a partial withdrawal would make most of us happy.
So, what keeps the swarm going toward Ron Paul news here on Digg.com? I have to believe that this mania has to do with somebody that doesn't seem to be affiliated with the CFR in the Oval Office. What if there was an alternative in the 2008 election? Would the CFR find a way to have a 1963 Dallas replay? Well, not if we can help it. (Note to RP: Please watch your back!) Any other RINO candidate will not do the job. And even if we have to vote in a way to defeat Hillary, are we any better off having a RINO candidate with CFR support? Rather than stocking your home with guns and ammo, wouldn't it be great if we could defeat the shadow government (CFR/Bilderburgers/etc) by nominating somebody without their support? Yes, thank the Lord for the Internet. Ron Paul is our SHOUT out to the ELITISTS, we are not allowing another one of them into running this country!
Please keep me in your prayers, as those black Suburbans should be showing up at my home anytime! - shadash, on 11/06/2007, -2/+2Top tier to me always meant the guys with the most money. When will Fox news begin to understand that the people don't want Giuliani.
- groverblue, on 11/06/2007, -2/+2numbers of donors was miss represented. it was more than 21,000 donors. try 35,000.
and why do they keep laughing? - groverblue, on 11/06/2007, -2/+2oops, i meant "misrepresented"
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is