What is Digg?36 Comments
- Fabc001, on 10/10/2007, -8/+38Those 20 spammers sure are loaded.
- coldfact, on 10/10/2007, -6/+29Spamming him online, spamming him with donations, spamming him with meetups - what's next, spamming him with votes?! Freaking spammers.
- babcat, on 10/10/2007, -4/+20Ron Paul is awesome! It's great to know that Americans are finally supporting a candidate that supports freedom, the constitution, and most importantly our RIGHTS! Also, it's fantastic to have people supporting a candidate who would bring our troops home from around the world IMMEDIATELY!
- AlexGrant, on 10/10/2007, -2/+15Dugg for how good all of these videos are. See how this guy answers questions? Straight-forward and well spoken and no brutal Bush-jokes. This is how I envision a president. I'm canadian by the way. But I can tell you right now: if I were American, voting for Ron Paul would be a day in which I would take a lot of pride, win or lose.
- Sematary, on 10/10/2007, -4/+10I'll be working tonight so I won't find out what happened in Ames until early tomorrow morning! Good luck, Dr. Paul!!!
- jaminunit, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6You only need one hundred million dollars if your message is really crap and you need to spend that much on slick propagander. Ron Paul doesn't because people here his message and do the campaining for him. but money does help for sure.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6Are you going to shut your ***** mouth if he gets MORE that 3%?
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -3/+6Just imagine how much Paul would have if the unconstitutional laws that dictate that we can ONLY give $2,300 each were to be abolished?
Why is it that I can only give $2,300 yet the damned Corporations can give what seems like unlimited amounts?
It's blatantly unconstitutional and yet another reason we need as many people like Paul in Government as we can get. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5go I wish block actually worked any more
- jeffiek, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4There's no limit on what you can spend promoting Paul on your own.
But signs, rent billboards, take out ads, sponsor events. Your imagination is your only limit. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Dawg says that he'll shut up about Paul if Paul gets 5%, yet he wants Paul supporters to shut up if Paul gets only 3%. Just like all other big government lovers, they love to have the adds stacked against those who believe in freedom.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3i'll take that bet you little freak. 3% ??? piece of cake and 5% you shut up? omg.. this is a gift... thank you dork. btw, obama is CFR which means he is a big puppet and does what his masters tell him to do.
- AKBryant54, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4That's retarded, although I believe he'll definitely get more than 5%, I don't really care if you troll against Ron Paul.
- ganjadude4391, on 10/10/2007, -1/+35. Ron Paul with 1305 votes, and 9.1%
took 5th place with 9.1 %, i think its time for you to stop the paul hate, YOU yourself said it 7 hours ago, well open mouth, insert foot - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Yes Paul is a kook. He wants to return control of the Federal government to the People where it belongs. With Socialist dicks like you in control he is a kook in a freedom sort a way.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3And you point is what? That he's evil because he believes in God?
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5Xuvious, I salute you.
I also recommend all OTHER ronbots to put your wallet where your mouth is: GIVE!
GIVE TILL IT HURTS! THEN GIVE MORE!
Come on, surely a few measly thousand dollars is as nothing to support THE LAST HOPE FOR THE USA, the ONE TRUE PATRIOT, the ... well whatever other stupid nicknames you've drugged up for Herr Doktor Ron "1%" Paul (PBUH!).
Come on, show some faith in your loon!
PRAISE RON! - ih8regs, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There is a quick solution, use the enemies tactics, incorporate then contribute;)
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/10/2007, -4/+5You're confusing me with your mother.
Tell you what, if Ron Paul gets more than 5% in the straw poll, I promise to never say a bad word about him on Digg again. In return, you promise to never comment about or submit about Ron Paul if he gets less than 3%. Deal?
Come on, if he's ever going to get above 3% it's now, when none of the heavy hitters have even bothered to show up! Show some faith in your kook!
Oh, and I'm voting for Obama. You know, a serious candidate with an actual platform of things he would like to work for, unlike Ron Paul and his platform of things he'd like to work AGAINST. - Junkyarddawg, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Because you spamming ***** can't learn to ***** in the kitty litter box: Election '08.
Post your ronspam there and enjoy the bliss of not being commented by me. - Smoove, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2$75K in donations can't be scripted or sock-puppeted either, dumbass. That's kinda the point of the article and Coldfact's comment. For that matter, neither can 1,305 votes at the straw poll in Iowa.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1ok loser (junkyarddork).. you lost the bet, i fully expect you to keep your ignorant mouth shut.
- Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Not at all.
He's evil because he uses his religious beliefs as justification for his political philosophies. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -4/+4who are you planning on voting on then - or do you even vote... oh wait you never respond because you are just a jackass troll
- iaoki, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Go Ron Paul!!!
- AKBryant54, on 10/10/2007, -4/+4He ended up with about 3m. You're right, it was great. I'm looking forward to the straw poll results as well!
- ssavelan, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1Is the federal reserve legal, just, or beneficial?
Go Ron Paul! - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1Are you telling me that You personally donated $2,300 to his campaign already? If you haven't, STFU and stop spamming please.
- SwordOfShannara, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1To have this kind of fund raising when the media has been totally against you is nothing short of amazing. This is a rate of 1 million every 12 days AND the rate of donations is increasing. 6 months to go before the primaries would put him at 18,000,000 (plus the 2 and a half he has, plus donations might increase). AWESOME!! Good old Herk here would have you believe that while the other candidates are spending more than they make that somehow its bad that Ron Paul gets tens of thousands of dollars a day for FREE is a bad thing. HAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHHAHA
- Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2And Paul is a hardcore Christian, and will do what his religion tells him.
- Magnolit, on 10/10/2007, -4/+1Why do you have to post in this story? GTFO spammer.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2Well, I'm glad that you're happy with it. You're incredibly naive and ignorant of how the election process works but at least you're happy. Enjoy his failure.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1I didn't see his message going too far today.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -9/+3$75,000 in a presidential campaign is next to nothing. According to estimates the candidates will need something like one-hundred million dollars in campaign finances. Ron Paul hasn't got enough funds to run for mayor of his home town.
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/10/2007, -16/+6Yeah, sure.
Remember how it was reported that the Ron Paul campaign had made "at least 3 and probably 5" million dollar? You should, because it was submitted to Digg at least twice.
Then the financial report was posted, and it turned out they'd made $2.4M.
Ron Pauls fans are lying bastards who cheat and game.
I'm looking forward to the ronbot explanation/excuses/conspiracies on how ronpaul will do so poorly in the straw poll. - Junkyarddawg, on 10/10/2007, -15/+4No, there' s absolutely no risk of spamming with votes - because the voting isn't online and can't be scripted & sockpuppeted.
Will you guys shut up and go away when ronpaul gets less than 3% in the straw poll? I mean, none of the heavy hitters even bothered to appear for it, so when ronpaul bombs AGAIN that should really tell you something. Shouldn't it.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is