What is Digg?92 Comments
- johndoraemi, on 11/09/2007, -5/+33Much more to the story than the WTC. See some highly disturbing facts about 9/11:
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-ge ...
With so many anomalies, and such obvious cover ups ... don't we deserve better?
Don't you people even care that you are being lied to by the government?
That you are being forced to conform to the media myths or labelled "insane?"
America is going down the tubes, straight into Nazi Germany territory.
Critical thought and analysis, use it or lose it.
John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/ - NuisanceMan, on 11/09/2007, -3/+28But mechanical fractures wouldn't cause flashes. Nor would they cause the explosions that are clearly visible at the very beginning of this video, right in the part of the South Tower near where the planes hit. Nor would they cause most of the building material to shoot outward at high speed, far away from the building's footprints, in all directions. Gravity makes things go down, not out. That's a pretty basic mechanical principle.
- imgstacke, on 10/28/2007, -7/+31BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM ---
Since NIST has discarded the initial pancake theory by FEMA, what else can cause this sound other than explosives going off in quick succession?
Also interesting to see the NIST investigator waiving off the reports of molten metal at the base of all three towers. He said he was at the site, but they were only permitted to examine the steel that was taken away to a secure site at the nearby landfill. Intellectual dishonesty at its best. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil... These people should all be imprisoned for the rest of their natural born lives for adding in the coverup of the murder of nearly 3000 people and the on going deaths of the first responders who are now dying as we speak.
We don't need the MSM to tell us what to think, its ***** obvious, those buildings were blown up from the top down! - jkeogh, on 11/09/2007, -5/+28The evidence for controlled demolition is prima facie. Game over. Soon we will be presented with the "backup patsies" as the death throws of this government continue. The scientists complicit in this cover up would be wise to come out now. Your names will not be forgotten and we are not going to loose.
http://governmentterror.com (checkout the NASA thermal images, first link on the left). - clockerbob, on 11/09/2007, -7/+28Good mix of interviews, quotes from witnesses and video. Well done.
- kIDx, on 11/09/2007, -5/+25Awesome video!
- HughManBeing, on 11/09/2007, -5/+25The TRUTH is definitely an Offense, but it sure ain't no Sin!! Pass it on.
- Vinadetta, on 11/09/2007, -4/+23Check Theory of Resistance: Massive Steel buildings can't come crashing to earth at free fall speeds perfectly symmetrical at free fall speeds due to fire !!!! It seems that the government wants us all to believe that giant steel buildings are actually made out of cardboard!!!!
WTC 7
9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB - cualcrees, on 11/09/2007, -8/+279/11 = Inside Job
- knarlyknight, on 11/09/2007, -4/+22What are you so scared of James, why are you making things up to avoid acknowledging the obvious?
- themacx, on 11/09/2007, -4/+18try and fragment a human body and dump it on a rooftop a few hundered feet away (in the time it took the buildings to fall down).. this is explained by pancaking bodies...according to NIST it would... wake up.. 911 inside job.. nice video.
- drbeeth, on 10/27/2007, -4/+18The 911 Truth community has been trying for years to have a scientific debate between proponents of the official "Ministry of Truth" version, and the independent 911 researchers.
The official version has never found one researcher prepared to take on such a debate.
The Official version is dead, and it is time our universities, newspapers and politicians took notice, as any-one making allusions about the all powerful and dangerous "Al Qaeda" who "attacked our country, are actually talking about a dangerous insider faction of the neocons manipulating western public opinion.
Study "GLADIO" in Europe, study former historic "False Flag attacks", study the evidence produced by the 911 truth community, and start working for government clean from these criminals.
Cynthia McKinney for our next President !
Logarithmic power of Love !
Dr Beeth - obliviousfool, on 11/09/2007, -3/+16Mechanical failures wouldn't create enough dust to cover lower Manhattan either. But hey, why let facts get in the way? Let's just stick to the conclusion given to us on day one.
- EighthSon, on 11/09/2007, -5/+18Awaiting response of ConsDemo or Herkimer56... :)
- puto, on 10/25/2007, -4/+16Don't forget that the NIST report was also debunked by it's former Chief too.
- horseplay, on 10/27/2007, -3/+15When you see the collapses up close it is so obvious it was a controlled demolition.
- knarlyknight, on 10/25/2007, -4/+15By whom? That is why we need an investigation BY AN AUTHORITY OTHER THAN THE US GOVERNMENT!
- imgstacke, on 11/09/2007, -9/+20Seems your "theory" doesn't agree with the facts, the sections of steel from the core were not fractured floor by floor but in 30ft sections, and as far as fracturing none of the beams seen in any of the FEMA photos here [ http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... ] - search parameters - Location: New York - Catergory: Terrorism - Date Range: 09/11/2001-09/30/2001 ] show any signs of "fracturing" that would occur in structural steel.
So again look at the FACTS before you start to theorize, otherwise your just making ***** up. - EighthSon, on 11/09/2007, -10/+19"How many of you have studied engineering, specifically fracture mechanics?"
These guys-- http://www.ae911truth.org/ - Vinadetta, on 10/26/2007, -2/+11Right Herk but your buddy James Miegs over at Popular Mechanics Credentials are so very impressive whose scientific credentials include being a former editor of Entertainment Weekly and Video Review!
- imgstacke, on 10/26/2007, -6/+15Maybe they are on a coffee break or something?
- imgstacke, on 10/26/2007, -3/+12Yeah cuz Harley Davidson man (CIA Plant) could see it was structural failure caused be the impact and jet fuel fires....
- funhouse1970, on 10/26/2007, -2/+11there he is. like an old friend. except, not a friend.
- NWOcon, on 10/26/2007, -2/+10Yeah, that guy came off like a really bad infomercial actor. Obvious disinfo plant.
- imgstacke, on 10/25/2007, -2/+9... comment system is flawwed
- DOVZAKHEIM, on 11/09/2007, -6/+13Only one problem James. Those failing vertical sections' "pops" wouldn't sound like explosions, and they wouldn't pulverize concrete into powder. You know what does sound like an explosion and can turn concrete into powder? AN EXPLOSION!!!
- themacx, on 11/09/2007, -7/+14oh.. and how do you get all that (lite) paperwork BLOWN out of desks closets and file-ing cabinets and out the building.. whilst destroying the desk it selves and the building.. All solid objects where blown to pieces but all the lite material was blown out... HOW?
- inactive, on 11/09/2007, -3/+10Amen. In case somebody does not know what he's referring to:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12944974/
"The black tower, left, is the vacant 41-story former Deutsche Bank AG building, which remains contaminated with toxic waste and still holding tiny body parts more than four years after the trade center collapsed."
Last time I checked collapsing buildings crush bodies instead of shooting pieces of bone on nearby buildings. - obliviousfool, on 11/09/2007, -4/+10Good music. Love the Cat Power at the end.
- imgstacke, on 10/25/2007, -6/+12http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fractures
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column blown apart above rescue workers head
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fractures
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - deformed box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fractures
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fractures
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fractures
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fractures - nice view of column still intact in sub-basement
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture [foreground]
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture - (These people deserve Justice)
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - possible fracture - also notice the box column above deformed and ripped almost completely apart. What could possibly do that? Hmmmmmmmm... (yes this is your pic and yet you don't even see the obvious)
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - blown apart/look at top and bottom
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - no fracture - deformations on one visible
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture - eutectic melting?
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture - eutectic melting?
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - no fracture - eutectic melting?
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - possible fracture? no discernible plane of failure
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box columns - one possible fracture [ very top of image ]
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - completely blown apart [ above head ]
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - shows welding cut - no fracture
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... - box column - blown apart
Whew found a picture of an actual fracture - http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/phot ... is this what you mean Spaza? - MrEguy, on 10/25/2007, -1/+7Herk, what are *your* professional credentials, besides BS artist?
- BrapAllgood, on 10/26/2007, -4/+10You obviously don't know what HAARP is capable of. Study some Tesla (the scientist, not the band) and it becomes clear very, very quickly. HAARP *is* the 'orbital mind-control lasers' and much, much more. Every American should know of HAARP...I never see that one on The History Channel, though. Go figure.
- LucidOne, on 10/26/2007, -1/+6There is NOT enough potential or kinetic energy contained in the standing World Trade center buildings to account for their collapse at nearly free-fall speed through the plane of MOST resistance and into their own footprints! This is impossible to account for without carefully placed and timed explosive cutter charges and controlled demolition. Every one of the huge steel support columns would have to fail at exactly the same instant over multiple floors in all three buildings, a statistical impossibility to say the least! Otherwise the buildings would just list to one side and then fall over leaving the bottom section still standing! There is also not enough energy contained in either the planes or their fuel to account for the almost complete pulverization of hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete into dust! There is no other explanation: 9/11 was an inside job!!!!
- inactive, on 10/26/2007, -4/+9Brap...are you serious?
- MrEguy, on 10/26/2007, -2/+6"You are an intellectually dishonest person and a very poor researcher. You fail."
That's pretty good PsyOp technique, there Herk. They taught you well. Unfortunately, many of us know your *****' game and it AIN'T-a-WORKIN. Guess you'll have to try again. Sorry, little man. - WaywardLad48, on 11/09/2007, -4/+8Well Herk do you know the formula for working out the shear strength of a weld.Obviously not or you wouldn,t spout so much crap.Now contemplate the miles and miles of welds in that building that would have all have to fail at exactly the same time.You talk a good story but your understanding of the most basic of concepts is feeble.Like your mate Spaz who doesn,t even understand the difference between an elastic an inelastic collapse.By the way i welded a lifting eye today which required 10 inches of weld.I then tested it to 50 ton of force,no problem and i don,t class myself as a proper welder.The building failed every 3rd floor which is where the welds were but only because that is where the explosives were shooting 50 ton steel members 500 feet sideways at a minimum of 68 mph.Or was it the compressed air doing that.I have been an engineer for 34 years in the nucleur defence industry,don,t pity me because i can smell ***** a mile away.
- imgstacke, on 10/26/2007, -1/+5i made him a friend - makes it easier to see what comments he approves of, guy is a shill.
- BrapAllgood, on 11/09/2007, -5/+9HAARP?
- BoDeeDoe, on 10/26/2007, -5/+9"Each vertical section would hold and maintain for a fraction of a second, then mechanically fail"
PRECISELY!!! The Towers could not have fallen at near free fall speed when you add up all those "fractions" of a second! You're almost there James... Now ask how you could have pancaking and pulverized mass at the same time. If the concrete is pulverized as it was then there isn't enough mass to keep the collapse continuing. Also, the upper part of the towers were essentially separated from the lower becoming a "falling body." Falling bodies always take the path of least resistance. It wouldn't fall through the lower part. It should deflect away somewhat. It did not. - inactive, on 10/26/2007, -3/+6WTC 7.
- EighthSon, on 10/26/2007, -5/+8The perimeter walls were shredded. No gravity collapse scenario can account for the ripping apart of the three-column by three-floor prefabricated column and spandrel plate units along their welds.
- Samwizen, on 10/27/2007, -1/+4Excellent video! The sheer multitude of First Responders who report hearing/seeing evidence of explosions--that alone Should be enough to persuade any reasonable person.
- Groovemaster, on 11/09/2007, -1/+4I'm starting to feel sorry for you, Herkimer.
You must feel like someone who works in a burger joint with a boss who orders him to fill the burgers with fresh *****.
It's obviously getting difficult convincing people they like the taste of what you're feeding them. - surffoxy, on 10/27/2007, -0/+3Hear blasts in this film too: From 1:08 to 1:11 in this video you can hear a quick succession of regularly timed blasts. As the 'collapse' gets down to the level of the firefighters a succession of separate and regularly timed blasts can be distinguished.
From the Nadet Brothers film.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=23DB_6ASkdE - NWOcon, on 10/26/2007, -3/+6Troll.
- BrapAllgood, on 10/26/2007, -4/+7I didn't say that. I made a suggestion that I don't see anyone considering.
- BrapAllgood, on 11/09/2007, -2/+4http://diggcomments.headzoo.com/Default.aspx?user= ...
Scroll to the bottom and look at the children playing with fire. Pretty pathetic. In fact, crossing the line pathetic on your part, blueprint. You are so far from Buddhist, it would be funny if I had humor left for your sorry ass.
Real men don't go around attacking other men's women. That's what little boys do. Real mature there, junior. - BoDeeDoe, on 11/09/2007, -3/+5Herkimer56 is rewriting the laws of physics when he says "Falling objects do not" (take the path of least resistance). Simple high school science tells you that a falling object will only fall into the path of least resistance, and is not even debatable. You lose you shill! Go away and quit trolling all the Ron Paul and 911 stories.
- Akufen, on 10/26/2007, -1/+3I have yet to hear a single university admitting that there was molten steel. Let alone explaining how 250°C steel melted in the first place.
So yea, until they do, I think I'll take my chances on not swallowing their fairytales without thinking for myself.
NIST just admitted that they are unable to fully explain the collapses btw. And have you missed the article explaining how NIST was/is all about politics instead of science? - BrapAllgood, on 10/26/2007, -4/+6Try this again a bit higher on the troll-stile.
The power of frequencies to manipulate objects is not only proven, it's VASTLY under-reported in the medias. There have been some pretty crazy scientists with some pretty crazy backers in the past century (or so), doing things in experimentation that most people will turn away from in disgust before actually learning the results.
Everything in this world is of a vibrational frequency that can be measured in content in different ways. Sound and light? Both events of frequency with measureable outputs, yes? Such is life. Just cuz you can't SEE it does not ever mean that it isn't there.... In fact, science says that you won't see something until you understand the conceptual underpinning of said thing. Ever hear of the Native americans who couldn't see the ships approaching on the horizon? This is an example of what I mean.
HAARP is all about frequency manipulation and bouncing these signals around the globe via the ionosphere. Your brain works on frequencies, same as your nervous system...ALL your systems. Have you seen the 'heat gun' on the news? ONE TINY CORNER of what HAARP can do. I am not gonna sit and blame HAARP for all of these things, but if you really wanna se a dodgy person, find some video of the HAARP director. I wasn't comfortable with him at the controls.... -
Show 51 - 89 of 89 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is