280 Comments
- Dumbledorito, on 11/02/2007, -10/+100And like Saddam before him, the neocons have labeled Ahmadinejad as "The New Hitler."
How many times are they going to try to pull this crap? It's just slightly more ridiculous than when apocalyptic Christian sects put out predictions over who's the Antichrist. - Napoleone, on 11/02/2007, -14/+83For all intents and purposes, the man most comparable to Hitler, in this situation, is George W. Bush. Only his motivations are different, yet, they're not at all altruistic.
Israel has the army necessary to take on Iran's. It has 200 nuclear bombs. It's their war, let them sacrifice their own citizens and not ours. - Bagos1, on 11/05/2007, -30/+94A Zionist piece of garbage....let's bomb his house and see how he fells about it.
- Stardigg, on 11/02/2007, -4/+60Obviously, a vote for Giuliani is a vote for World War III.
- inactive, on 11/02/2007, -15/+60the only "new hitler" is bush.
- Bagos1, on 11/02/2007, -5/+43No, send his son and daughter there...and let them send letters back to the family.
- ClosedCaption, on 11/02/2007, -6/+38http://www.lukeford.net/Images/photos/out.pdf
"The hatred I still feel for Negroes is the hardest of all the old feelings to face or admit, and it is the most hidden and the most overlarded by the conscious attitudes into which I have succeeded in willing myself. It no longer has, as for me it once did, any cause or justification (except, perhaps that I am constantly being denied my right to an honest expression of the things I earned the right as a child to feel). How, then, do I know that this hatred has never entirely disappeared? I know it from the insane rage that can stir in me at the thought of Negro anti-Semitism; I know it from the disgusting prurience that can stir in me at the sight of a mixed couple; and I know it from the violence that can stir in my whenever I encounter that special brand of paranoid touchiness to which many Negroes are prone. . . .
There were plenty of bad boys among the whites -- this was, after all, a neighborhood with a long tradition of crime as a career open to aspiring talents -- but the Negroes were really bad, bad in a way that beckoned to one, and made one feel inadequate."
No wonder he advocates for war so badly...He's a pussy who's trying to relive his childhood through the troops. Wishing he was "bad" instead getting the holy ***** beat out of him. - Innova69, on 11/02/2007, -6/+34As many more times as needed, there are still a lot of sheep out there.
"So, if you're not with us,.. you're with the terrorists"- a Quote from a bumbling idiot. - Vinadetta, on 11/02/2007, -10/+35IMO Podhortez is total scum!!! He is only part of the evil controlling the Elite!!! If you elect Ghouliani it will be this scumbag who is controlling the presidency!!!!
- tom500k, on 11/02/2007, -1/+25Can this war-monger plead senility? Weren't Podhoretz and his son in law, Eliot Abrams, the war criminals who lied us into invading Iraq? Why does the New Hour give these dangerous fools air time while keeping real scholars like Chomsky off the air?
- inactive, on 11/02/2007, -3/+26These war mongering lunatics will be the end of this country.
- Klak, on 11/02/2007, -4/+25do they think if they bring about the Apocalypse then Jesus will appear?
- MegaJimmy8, on 11/02/2007, -4/+25CORRECTION: Anyone Who Wants To ‘Bomb Iran’ Is Appeasing ‘Hitler'
- inactive, on 11/02/2007, -3/+24"The New Hitler." what is Bush giving up his title so easily?
- hawkeye17, on 11/02/2007, -2/+22Norman is ***** crazy. How do we grow these kind of people in America anyway?
- spyd3rweb, on 10/31/2007, -4/+24zionism != judaism shows how much you know.
- sotopheavy, on 11/02/2007, -1/+21Anyone who lets the US get away with bombing Iran is appeasing Hitler.
- inactive, on 10/31/2007, -1/+20thanks for giving me all the reason I need to report you.
- Genady, on 11/02/2007, -1/+19What is deeply disturbing to me is how much the drumbeats of war against Iran sound like the drumbeats of war against Iraq. I read 'The Threatening Storm' in late 2002, early 2003 and found it persuasive. I've sense changed my mind, but it does disturb me how similar current argument are against Iran. I fear that to stop the madness of King George this time around there will have to be civil unrest not seen since the 60's, and the current generation seems ill prepared for the task.
- Danial, on 11/02/2007, -1/+19Funny he has no problem with the U.S. supporting ex-Nazis in power. Greek junta anyone?
- krnldmp, on 11/02/2007, -4/+21Apparently some people just can't stop yanking it to thoughts of bombing Iran.
- colonelbuckshot, on 11/02/2007, -3/+19PODHORETZ: "Well, if we were to bomb the Iranians as I hope and pray we will, we’ll unleash a wave of anti-Americanism all over the world that will make the anti-Americanism we’ve experienced so far look like a lovefest."
The neo-con Zionists at AIPAC and PNAC must be laughing at the ordinary Americans doing all their work for them. - praveens, on 10/31/2007, -6/+22this jew does not care about the US..only israel
- eerbin13, on 11/02/2007, -2/+17And you're a stupid, ignorant bastard who thinks in terms of left and right, instead of thinking of people as human beings with thoughts and feelings. As much as you think he's a "leftist stooge" you most definitely ARE a brainwashed right wing piece of *****, one of the 26% who still support Bush, I bet. Calling someone a "*****" is ridiculous in and of itself. The only ignorant pricks use that kind of terminology. You can find much better insults, if you bothered looking, that don't involve demeaning the sexual orientation of another group of people. I'm a free thinker and twice the man you think you are. I'd smear your ass on the asphalt, light you on fire, piss on the remains, and walk down the street laughing about it. NOW THAT'S AN INSULT, BITCH!!!
- ButterBuddha, on 11/02/2007, -3/+18Fareed Zackaria: "Anyone Who Doesn’t Want To ‘Bomb Iran’ Is Not ***** Crazy"
- inactive, on 11/02/2007, -3/+18This is mind boggling. Yes, lets bomb a country who has not invaded another country or declared war for over 100 years. That's right Iran deserves to die just because they have managed to wait for a century to plot their evil nature. Does anyone else get how ***** ridiculous this is?
- Ub3rg33k, on 10/31/2007, -4/+19You laugh, but the answer in many cases is "yes". Why do you think the evangelical neo-con base don't give two camel turds what they do in the Middle East?
- n8glenn, on 11/02/2007, -1/+16Did anyone notice that when Fareed mentioned how wrong Podhoretz was about the soviets, the old windbag continued to argue his old position, even though we now know beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was wrong?
- MadHarvey, on 11/02/2007, -2/+16The terms Democrat, Liberal, Neocon, republican, etc. just confuse the issues. They give people a predefined argument when they can't think for themselves. We are all just people, and there are some universal, undebatable truths that should govern all foreign policy:
1. Killing people is bad
2. Imposing any particular way of life on a group of people is bad
3. War is pure failure of humanity. Everything humans stand for is thrown away when they decide to go to war. Every day that a war continues should be mourned as we have slipped thousands of years back on the evolutionary latter and can't start over again until the war ends. Sometimes, it is unavoidable, but it should be looked on as the worst thing humanity can take part in, and not a precautionary measure to take against a country.
4. Open/fair trade and open communication with other countries is good
5. Oppressive/single-sided trade and lack of communication is bad
You could write a computer program to do this *****... - TradaPIB, on 10/31/2007, -2/+16Hitler was charismatic and loved by his people.
- Napoleone, on 11/02/2007, -1/+15You're in the dark, my friend. The fact that Israel has hundreds of nukes is an open international secret.
They assisted the French with their own nuclear program and in turn got a few hundred bombs out of it. Do the research. - robberry, on 10/31/2007, -0/+13He spoke better English, too.
- x083, on 11/02/2007, -4/+17this man is a compulsive liar, who is senile, and doesn't deserve the dignity to consume the flesh that other living creatures have given. without prayer or worship, taking for granted everything he has today... he is a zionist p.o.s. who is trying to impose world government from the top down.. with 1 centralized leader.. so they can reduce the human population to levels that are controllable, then implant us with RFID chips... so we can be tracked as slaves and serfs... this man has no god, this man is not a man at all.... he worships lucifer the devil, and will end up in hell with satan, stalin, and adolf hitler himself
read the project for a new american century if you disagree....
obama, clinton, and edwards are all council on foreign relations members.... and bilderbergers........
the council on foreign relations was started by the rockefeller family...
educate yourself....
www.themoneymasters.com = watch it for free on google video
www.freedomtofascism.com = watch it for free on google video
www.globalresearch.ca = get educated from real news.. not propaghanda
wake up your neighbors.. america is asleep at the wheel and we are driving straight ahead into tyranny at 90mph... if you cannot donate, pass out dvds, write articles in your local news paper, school news paper, give speeches, presentations to family members..
RON PAUL or SLAVERY 2008 - erkokite, on 11/02/2007, -1/+14The free world will never bow to Islamic law. We don't need to bomb Islamic states to prove it.
- Jexie, on 11/02/2007, -2/+15To paraphrase a another article that was around here recently: ***** Godwin's law, if it talks like Hitler and acts like Hitler the comparison is fair. Godwin's law might be some witty little logical truism but it has no real qualitative value.
- Icebath, on 11/02/2007, -3/+15Fear is a tool that the lazy use to shepherd the dull. We need leaders who will heave the easy, empty rhetoric of fear into the dustbin of history. I doubt this will ever happen though.
- inactive, on 11/02/2007, -2/+14You are right on the money with that comment x; however, we didn't see those Feds when they made the deal with AT&T either, did we? And as far as a nationalistic fervor; look at what is going on with the immigration issue. Note that Germany's economy was in the ***** when he rose to power. People will start to lose their jobs, homes, fuel prices will rise to obscene levels; then my friend you have:
A) Server Raiding
B) Nationalistic Fervor
Good Luck - Lindane, on 11/05/2007, -1/+13Ziocon: conflation of Zionist and Neocon. Many of these individuals are responsible pushing the US & Britain to invade Iraq. They do the bidding of AIPAC and hence Israel.
A partial list of Ziocons includes: Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, Doulas Feith, David Wurmser, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, David Frum, Charles Krauthammer, Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristoll, Midge Decter, Dov Zakheim, Robert B. Zoellick, Eliot Cohen, William Kristoll, Robert Kagan, Joshua Muravchik, Meyrav Wurmser, Irwin Stelzer, Michael Ledeen, Daniel Pipes, Lawrence Kaplan, Marty Peretz, David Brooks, John Podhoretz, Neal Kozodoy, Jonah Goldberg - spyd3rweb, on 11/02/2007, -2/+14A vote for romney is a vote for double the torture and double guantanimo and world war III.
- erkokite, on 11/02/2007, -1/+12I've never preached the virtues of the "grand islamic Marxist state," or whatever the hell you're referring to. Most liberals are ardent secularists and staunch opponents of Islamic states. You seem to think that liberals support Iran solely because we don't want to bomb them. Must we bomb everyone we don't agree with? Because sometimes I swear that's how you neo-con warmongering asshats think. Must make for a pretty ***** foreign policy.
- JonForTheWin, on 11/02/2007, -2/+13It'd be awesome if they didn't, if you trust a nuclear armed Isreal, you're a true *****.
- toasty168, on 11/02/2007, -2/+13what the *****? hitler was taking over countries. why can't iran do what it wants in it's own country? why do we have to bomb them because we think they MIGHT build a nuclear weapon which even if they did, what gives us the right to say they can't? who made us the rulers of the world? i understand we all want to feel safe by making all other countries ***** but feeling safe all the time is overrated and nullifies cultural natural selection.
- pintomp3, on 11/02/2007, -0/+11not jews. zionists, both jewish and christian, and neo-cons. not all jews are zionists and not all zionists are jews.
- rz8472, on 11/02/2007, -0/+11He's on Giuliani's foreign policy team. No wonder the neocons are flocking to him...
- Danial, on 11/02/2007, -2/+13And we overthrew their democratically-elected government in '53 to install a brutal tyrant in the process. If anything, the U.S. declared war on Iran then as a result.
- Shigglyboo, on 10/31/2007, -7/+17can we all just keep our dicks in our pants here? most of us just wanna have a half-decent life without getting spooged on by greedy power hungry emperors.
- AnotherBrian, on 10/31/2007, -1/+11I must admit that, like most of us, I don't like the idea of Iran having nuclear weapons; but just who the ***** are we to say they are not allowed to develop them? We really have no right to be ordering other nations around like that. Imagine if the leaders China said the we where not allowed to develop nuclear bombs and where threating to take out out reactors and refining facilities. My very first instinct would be to start making some nuclear weapons.
- clearzen, on 10/31/2007, -3/+12These warmongering fools are destroying us all. Call me a dirty hippie or whatever you want but what business do we have bombing anyone who hasn't attacked us. Why do these people desire blood so much? These types of statements make me feel like crying. I fear for the stability of the world if we step into Iran.
- clarewhitz, on 10/31/2007, -2/+11"Podhoretz would like nothing better than to bomb Iran, even though he believes it may 'unleash a wave of anti-Americanism all over the world. Furthermore, he is 'certain' President Bush will do it before he leaves office, to which he says 'thank God.'"
C'mon America, Let's Impeach Bush BEFORE He Can Do It Again!!! - toasty168, on 10/31/2007, -2/+11of course it's been thoroughly proven that not only was what he said taken out of context but also mis-translated. he really said time would wipe israel away. also, amedinijhad is not numero uno in iran. he's mainly just a figure head. why does anybody care what he says? in addition, why do we even give a flying ***** about israel besides the fact they own half of congress?
-
Show 51 - 100 of 285 discussions



What is Digg?