4 Comments
- duckley, on 08/31/2008, -2/+8I understand it is dangerous for the foetus to fly during the last trimester, MUCH LESS during labor!
This is TERRIBLE judgement.
SOMEONE PLEASE get to the bottom of this lie. - jforjools, on 09/01/2008, -2/+3Yeah, there is something OFF with the Baracuda.
At the very least, she does not seem to be as 'pro-life' as she claims. She endangered her baby in about ten different ways by my count. Denied her baby immediate medical care when she went into premature labor...Denied the baby access to antibiotics after the amniotic sac broke....Went into flight while in labor...Denied her baby the care of a well-equipped premie care unit AGAIN once in Anchorage....
.....All so she could have this baby in her hometown????? wtf???? - jbbears554, on 09/01/2008, -1/+1here is a picture of bristol before this incident occured.. now the picture is off of Sarah's website.. look how skinny she was
http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bristol_Palin_Co ... - edmondburke, on 09/01/2008, -2/+2This is criminal and unbelieveable. It should not be discussed until there is positive proof, out of respect for the baby whose health was so compromised. It, if true, would be the actions of someone who put her baby in harms way to the point of risking, and perhaps hoping for a still birth. It is an incredulous act which should never be raised without concrete proof, and if true, the necessary steps taken with the police and Welfare Services. It is not the actions of a responsible mother and the protagonist must be held accountable.


What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the