What is Digg?21 Comments
- StingingNettle, on 05/07/2008, -2/+13Bitch.
- inactive, on 05/07/2008, -1/+12I see no reason to spend another dime on the illegal murder of Iraqi civilians.
- inactive, on 05/07/2008, -3/+12Who is really surprised by this? All I can say is congratulations Dems. You put her in that position. Having lived in the Bay Area many years, NOTHING surprises me about that woman.
- inactive, on 05/07/2008, -3/+11stop the war stop the killing stop the military industrial complex!
Ron Paul president - brad3378, on 05/08/2008, -0/+4Here's a few more details about where some of the money is going:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hj7bLU_VVjrxBnH ... - inactive, on 05/08/2008, -0/+4And I repeat "That BITCH" (sorry)
She needs a reality check B.T. - fairley7, on 05/08/2008, -1/+5Pelosi is the the flip side to Bush of the American ruling class coin. Just as Bush is the son of a President and the brother of a governor, she is the daughter and sister of mayors of Baltimore. This is "democracy"? These folks are born to rule. These people truly are our rulers: Born to impose the jack boot of American imperialism abroad and a police state at home.
- inactive, on 05/08/2008, -0/+3turned the white house cafeteria into 'Tavern on the Green"
and of course we all paid for that too.
No I guess that don't count as a an accomplishment, that bitch! - inactive, on 05/08/2008, -0/+3Well that was the first thing that came to my mind too! Pelosi you BITCH!
- inactive, on 05/08/2008, -1/+4if she was just a little more queenie she'd be the new Liebermann
- quesi, on 05/08/2008, -1/+4she just doesn't want her pro-israel funds to dry up... stopping the war is anti-semitic, dontcha know?
- inactive, on 05/08/2008, -0/+3So about 8% (that has been reported so far) of the bill has nothing to do with the war.
- Todash19, on 05/08/2008, -0/+2Wow, we agree on something.
Cool... - brjohnson789, on 05/08/2008, -0/+2And I GUARANTEE the dems will continue to fund the war after they win the white house and more seats in Congress. They may pull even half the troops out within a couple years, but we will still have a deficit, and the Iraq occupation will still continue to cost billions every month.
- Todash19, on 05/08/2008, -0/+2Pelosi (D-Calif.) spent a little more than $3 million (ON FLOWERS!) in the first nine months of 2007, records show, compared to the $1.8 million Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) spent during the same period in 2006.
Wait, that doesnt count either.
Keep looking!
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-buys-16 ... - brad3378, on 05/08/2008, -0/+2Sorry - that's the best detailed information I could find.........And I agree. It has nothing to do with the war.
- Todash19, on 05/08/2008, -0/+2Of course they will.
151 Congress members have investments that profit from Wars.
• Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) $3,001,006 to $5,015,001
• Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) $250,001 to $500,000
• Rep. Kenny Ewell Marchant (R-Tex.) $162,074 to $162,074
• Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) $115,002 to $300,000
• Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) $115,002 to $300,000
• Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.) $100,870 to $100,870
• Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) $65,646 to $65,646
• Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) $50,008 to $227,000
• Rep. Sam Farr (D-Calif.) $50,001 to $100,000
• Rep. Stephen Ira Cohen (D-Tenn.) $45,003 to $150,000
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/151_congress ... - quesi, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1yet they dont recuse themselves from voting on matters of war/security/etc.? if only their constituents knew/cared/mattered, huh?
- inactive, on 05/07/2008, -4/+1No wonder all the Neo-Con ignorant anti-American grunts were so fearful of her. They were wrong again!
- alfal99, on 05/08/2008, -6/+0what happened to her...she used to be cool...
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is