What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
Best Buy Employees Turn Carolers For A Day view!
www.youtube.com/bestbuy - Go behind the scenes to see real employees croon their way to star in Best Buy's holiday campaign.
138 Comments
- motivatedmama, on 04/08/2008, -3/+49It was the visit from Hillary that cinched it for Obama I'm sure. You couldn't listen to them consecutively and choose otherwise.
Keep 'em coming supers! - DiggLive, on 04/08/2008, -3/+36I can't wait until he gets more total supers than her, and then wins Pennsylvania or loses by single digits. Two more weeks!
- junkwheel, on 04/08/2008, -4/+26Most people on Digg like Obama, which is why his stuff lands on the front page. Get over it.
- Schrodinger2, on 04/08/2008, -2/+22hillary is turning out to be quite the masochist. Why else would she stick around to see her campaign die like that?
- cresswga, on 04/08/2008, -1/+16Just uncheck the 2008 election category that the stories appear in.
- wild, on 04/08/2008, -1/+14Does anyone have a list of superdelegates that have recently decided to vote for Hillary? Don't get me wrong, I like seeing more and more of them choose Obama, but I feel like you never see balanced reports. I am curious if that is because she hasn't gotten any new ones, or if its just under reported.
- inactive, on 04/08/2008, -0/+12Maybe it not her decision to make? Maybe her backers will want their money back if she drops out? Perhaps she's stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea. More reasons not to vote her in.
- JlmAWP, on 04/08/2008, -0/+11I believe it's somewhere in the realm of 80-2 since the beginning of March, or something like that. Basically, he's destroying her. But you'll never know that by "how close" the race is....apparently.
- djscsi, on 04/08/2008, -4/+14Definitely a big Obama supporter here, but do we have to digg every single vote that he gets for the next 6 months? That would be something like 400 more articles. The Obamaspam is getting tired.
- legendxx, on 04/08/2008, -1/+10May you burn in hell spammer.
- dinot, on 04/08/2008, -0/+8The ones that support him know quite a lot about him, actually. It's the ones who don't like him that don't know ***** about his policies. For example:"he's a socialist", "racist pastor 20 years congregation, etc", "doesn't wear flag pin", "pledge of allegiance hand on heart", "muslim madrassa oh noes!", "gonna tax us to death", "wife hates america!".... and so on.
- packetstorm, on 04/08/2008, -1/+9Whether you hate him or love him Obama has run an excellent campaign. It is a testament to his organizational skills and attention to detail. He has surrounded himself with an excellent staff who knows their jobs and get it done. I can only imagine what he could do as President. A far cry from Hillary's campaign and its continued issues. From my perspective, I would think that the campaigns would mirror their presidencies. Clinton's would be a mess again just like her campaign and Obama's would be like a well run company, similar to his current campaign.
- trevorh, on 04/08/2008, -0/+8Montana is on the front page of Digg!!!!!
- amoirae, on 04/08/2008, -0/+8You must be from a red state, you can't even spell his first name right.
- djscsi, on 04/08/2008, -0/+7DTFO?
- cranium, on 04/08/2008, -0/+7Here's a really good list, sorted by the date they announced:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2008/primaries/sup ... - thatspsychotic, on 04/08/2008, -0/+7Buried, reported.
- coyoteblue, on 04/08/2008, -0/+7Yeah Obama came to Missoula and held a free rally at UM's Fieldhouse.
Meanwhile Hillary held a fundraiser that cost $250 a ticket. In a town full of poor college students, it's not hard to figure out where most people went. - dinot, on 04/08/2008, -0/+6No. YOU believe that they believe him to be Jesus Christ.
- mahler, on 04/08/2008, -0/+6I think Obama is less obsessed with money, power and personal gain, compared to Clinton or McCain.
As for calling him a towel head: You're either making a really old joke or have been living under a rock the last year. - KraftDinner101, on 04/08/2008, -1/+7His name isn't George W. Bush.
- ash84, on 04/08/2008, -0/+6Si se puede!!
- Berkana, on 04/08/2008, -4/+9I can't wait to see Hillary cry like a baby.
- smacksaw, on 04/08/2008, -2/+7So she tricked him into going to Montana the other day by trying to poach his supporters and he comes out with 2 new superdelegates?
You'd think she would learn after the Wright thing. Give Obama lemons and he makes lemonade. - jkoski, on 04/08/2008, -1/+6LOST!
- neognostic, on 04/08/2008, -1/+6RRjackson, are you still spreading those lies that you had sex with Obama and did coke with him? I thought you already had your 15 minutes of fame.
- junkwheel, on 04/08/2008, -0/+5And *****, his middle name is HUSSEIN.
As everybody knows, the........tens of thousands?...of people with Hussein in their name are all dictators! They should not be allowed any job, let alone be president!
When will us Obama cult following fanatics ever wake up and 'get real?'. I can't answer that because I have my head so far in the clouds that I can't see ***** for hope. - inavat, on 04/08/2008, -2/+6You're so manipulatable that your vote can be swayed by a bunch of jackasses on digg.com? Wow.. political campaigns must love having simpletons like you as targets.
- Vermifax, on 04/08/2008, -1/+5I love Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a true American Patriot.
Obama 2008. - damnyooneek, on 04/08/2008, -0/+4youre a waste of life.
- Chirp08, on 04/08/2008, -0/+4Yeah there was an article saying if she backs out now she has to repay everything, and she can't afford her loans already, she needs to stick in there to make some of the debt go away if for no other reason.
- blackinthmiddle, on 04/08/2008, -1/+5drop the ***** out. Threw me for a sec as well.
- kipmartin, on 04/08/2008, -0/+4thats some sound financial planning right there.
- kipmartin, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3perserverence?
"It's merely a flesh wound! I'll bite your knees off!!" - scheibs14, on 04/08/2008, -3/+6It's time for Hillary to DTFO
- scottc, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3While at least one delegate did have to back off because of the rules (which don't apply to all of the superdelegates there), it is a strong indication of who they are likely to vote for.
- TheUngod, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3Did Larry the Cable Guy join digg?
- jkoski, on 04/08/2008, -1/+4Dude, she isn't going to cry. She's going to go into a raging freak-out session that's going to require a lot of sedatives and most assuredly protective cups for any man that dare comes near her. Then she's going to campaign for McCain.
- dinot, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3Frankly, at this point I'd rather have an actual "towel head muslim" than Hillary.
- amoirae, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3You're only brain dead. You have to sacrifice having a soul to cross totally over. Thus, you're really a libertarian.
- FecalHurler, on 04/08/2008, -1/+4Are you insane? What the ***** have you been reading?
- StarlessKnight, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3*Golf clap* Absolutely. Brilliant. Did you even bother reading the parent comment you're replying to? A genuinely curious question hoping to receive a more balanced tally of where the Super Delegates stand, and all you can say is "CORRECTION FOR OBAMATARDS."
- inactive, on 04/08/2008, -1/+4From a supposed "fan" of HRC but I think we all know RR is a republican troll.
- damnyooneek, on 04/08/2008, -0/+3you know nothing about this man and you hate him. you're likely a middle to low income person and if you do some research you'll realize he is trying to make your life better.
- blackinthmiddle, on 04/08/2008, -2/+5Voters like you are the reason we had two terms of dubya!
- allengeer, on 04/08/2008, -0/+2Supporters of a candidate are a reflection of the candidate?! HOLY ***** ***** you are dumb! What rule says that for me to support you I have to be like you or reflect your vision?! There is none. I am free to support ANYONE for WHATEVER REASON. I can support someone for the reason that THEY DO NOT REFLECT ME. I can support a candidate because they are cute. I can support a candidate because i think they are Islamic. I can support a candidate for reason's THAT AREN'T EVEN TRUE!
Additionally, you are using the statement "a candidates stance is a function of the supporters of that candidate" and then turning around and saying that the candidates stance must also be a function of a single supporter. A candidates stance in average will be aligned with his constituents stances averaged. But you cannot do this on supporter by supporter basis. Its fuzzy math. - cranium, on 04/08/2008, -0/+2No, 4 months ought to do it.
- bryanricker, on 04/08/2008, -0/+2"scores"? what is this, football?
- inactive, on 04/08/2008, -0/+2This story is incorrect. The delegates had to back off, after learning about Montana delegate rules under a "contested" primary.
- Gemfinder, on 04/08/2008, -1/+3A white-collar bigot? Double-buried, double-reported. Have a nice day, *****.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 139 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is