What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
The camera starts rolling on Best Buy holiday campaign. view!
www.youtube.com/bestbuy - A behind the scenes look at one employee's singing debut.
57 Comments
- zephyear, on 04/10/2008, -11/+28gee i wonder what caused that
maybe a certain democrat not willing to concede so he can focus on the real enemy - TomK88, on 04/11/2008, -1/+9Are the polls as fake as the ones that correctly predicted Ron Paul barely being an afterthought in the election?
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 04/11/2008, -1/+7Blocking because you're just a freaking idiot for the 100th time in a row.
- card51short, on 04/11/2008, -1/+6jcm you pretend like you're critical of bush when you're the biggest Bush ass kisser I've ever seen.
I've never seen you say ONE bad thing about him. In fact, I've seen you praise and defend the many many times.
The funny thing about it is you will always maintain you aren't supporting him... - stretch611, on 04/11/2008, -3/+8He doesn't??? He still farts butterflies right??? :)
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 04/11/2008, -1/+5I would seriously leave the country if any one of them ended up on the Supreme Court. That would destroy the SCOTUS. Might as well then scrap the government and start over.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -1/+5@jcm267 Yeah, because after 3 months the lifeless lump of cells magically turns into a human being. Anyway, if you don't like abortion, look into who's backed it from the beginning: http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/tay/tay_04robthe ...
Ask yourself why your politicians never talk about this issue. - atdigg, on 04/11/2008, -3/+7Thank you Hillary!
- JAVandiver, on 04/11/2008, -3/+7I was more trying to illustrate what kind of douchebag you are, thanks for playing... How about socialized medicine, federally mandated redistribution of wealth, and the nationalization of education, for a start. Everyone knows that you are nothing but a far Left agitator. It is people like you and notque that have made digg into the far Left circle jerk that it has become. Drink your Kool-Aid and shut up.
- Stevanoski, on 04/11/2008, -0/+3No, means he will be fatally weakened politically and America will know the truth about him.
- JaronDiggGuy, on 04/11/2008, -3/+6RepubOperative...you dolt. You fail.
I really find it impressive that ANYONE can support the Republicans this year after 8 years of idiocy. Please tell me, if you can, what your reasons are.
A final caveat: You can't mention the Democratic nominees at all. Go. - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -5/+8More Obama liberal policies. The Marxist Barack Obama wants to implement a recurring tax on Americans to the tune of $800 BILLION US Dollars to provide for poor countries.
Obama’s Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote
www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-global-tax-proposal-up-for-senate-vote/
A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.
Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has not endorsed either Senator Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. But on Thursday, February 14, he is trying to rush Obama's "Global Poverty Act" (S.2433) through his committee. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends. - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -2/+5http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pi ...
http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pi ...
I'm all in favor of abortion in the first trimester, but are you honestly defending the idea of late term abortion for all chico? You have no respect for human life. - neognostic, on 04/11/2008, -0/+3NoSocialism has been on Digg for 10 days and has 400 friends, another user trying to game the system. And judging from his picture, a Log Cabin Republican.
- diggeradoo, on 04/11/2008, -5/+8Way to go, Hillary. Still working on your 2012 campaign bid to oust McCain?
- theDunedan, on 04/11/2008, -4/+6Don't forget. It's only April.
- JAVandiver, on 04/11/2008, -6/+8It could also be that Americans are learning more about the Democratic candidates and do not like how far left they actually are. Both H-Rod and B/O are extremely Liberal, most of the United States is significantly more moderate.
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 04/11/2008, -2/+4Of course. Only a gamed non-scientific online poll that showed Ron Paul with 98.5% of the vote was legit!
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 04/11/2008, -4/+6You're an idiot. McCain and Bush hate each other. McCain is a MODERATE Republican. But you keep on trying to fight the 2000 and 2004 election over and over. You'll keep losing.
- inactive, on 04/10/2008, -14/+15these polls are as fake as snow in July...
as a Ron Paul supporter I say no more trillion dollar wars!
warmonger McCain must be stopped. - Coven, on 04/11/2008, -6/+7"that is how they get around the rules"
Ok, so my boss is a devout republican. He supported Giuliani, now he supports McCain. I donated to Obama twice this campaign. Does that mean HE supports Obama? - dshPls, on 04/11/2008, -3/+4Well that's the judgment you've come to without any basis in facts or proof... I mean he is black though!
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -5/+6Liberal Obama policies....I've got a million of them but you libs never listen. Barack Obama supports partial birth abortions. As a Digg user you should acquaint yourself with what he approves. Read on about what Barack supports and Hillary did NOT:
http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pi ...
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/index.html
www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pictures_Abortion_Photos/
www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/index.html - dshPls, on 04/11/2008, -4/+5Who doesn't have access to healthcare? Some people just don't work to pay for it and/or don't care.
- Brian47126, on 04/11/2008, -1/+1I believe that you sir, are a *****
Ban republican marriage - light65733, on 04/10/2008, -9/+9Sounds like Obama could use some more money bombs. Once that other democratic pesky opponent is finally vanquished, Obama can turn is attention to Grandpa and the Republican status quo machine. It is fair and poetly justice to use your rebate check (the money that government has borrowed on your behalf and mailed off as a gift) to provide the economic ammunition needed to win this final battle.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -7/+7You dolt...don't you think everyone knows that that is how they get around the rules. You dolt.
- CaptainNoPants, on 04/11/2008, -1/+1Nosocialism: buried and reported.
- dmh11686, on 04/10/2008, -11/+11Hopefully this makes the front page it would be good to have a story that isn't the equivalent of Obama ***** puppies and pees rainbows.
- NATED066, on 04/11/2008, -1/+1If Obama gets the nomination (which I pray to jeebus he does) Hillary with still try to make sure he loses the election (albeit a tad more secretly) so that she can run in 2012. She is a bitch queen from hell, and your country would implode under her brand of leadership...
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -10/+10We must keep hammering Obama until the race is over! @fedupamerica once smartly said:
Senator Obama has taken more money from the top 10 issuers of subprime loans than BOTH Senator Clinton and Senator McCain.
Obama has taken $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans. [cq.com]
Obama received $266,907 from Lehman.
Obama received $5395 from GMAC.
Obama received $150,850 from Credit Suisse First Boston.
Obama received $11,250 from Countrywide.
Obama received $9052 from Washington Mutual.
Obama received $161,850 from Citigroup.
Obama received $4600 from CBASS.
Obama received $170,050 from Morgan Stanley.
Obama received $1150 from Centex.
Obama received $351,900 from Goldman Sachs. - SpaceMonkeyZero, on 04/11/2008, -5/+5Nationalized Health Care. If that isn't a socialist policy, then I don't know what is. Both of them want it.
- JAVandiver, on 04/11/2008, -5/+5The better questions are:
Which policy of Senator Clinton is NOT "liberal?"
Which policy of Senator Obama is NOT "liberal?" - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -6/+5Which policy of Senator Clinton is "liberal?"
Which policy of Senator Obama is "liberal?" - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -5/+4http://borgenproject.org/globalpovertyact.html
The Global Poverty Act is good legislation and could be construed as "liberal" if it's recommendations are actually followed (something the Act doesn't require.) You get half credit. - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -6/+5I'm actually mad at Congress for the past 8 years. They didn't let Bush get school choice, didn't work to do anything about Social Security, gave Bush a hard time on judges, failed to do anything to end our dependence on foreign oil whether it be via drilling in ANWR or building more nuclear plants (I'd like Hydroelectric, too). I think we need a line-item veto so that these schmucks who get reelected because of pork might get screwed by a President now and then. Maybe if they don't get bridges to nowhere or money for shrimp museums they won't get reelected and maybe a few of the people who replace them will actually be serious about doing something constructive in Congress.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -4/+3Can you point out either candidates position that calls for nationalizing health care? I'd like to vote for someone that supports nationalizing healthcare. Please help me by showing me where either candidate supports nationalization. All I can find are plans to give tax dollars to private insurance corporations here:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/
and here:
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/healthcare/
Both are planning to use tax dollars to pay for insurance policies instead of nationalizing the system and eliminating the middleman insurance corporations. - aragon127, on 04/11/2008, -4/+3Those evil bastards trying to ensure that every American has access to health care. We should stone them to death.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -7/+5No one dies in an abortion. Now ***** off and mind your own business.
And I'm still waiting for an answer.... - Coven, on 04/11/2008, -5/+3Provide evidence that this is happening with Obama's donations. The vast majority of Obama's donations are below $100 and are given through his website.
Why plug your website and not even bother to link it here or in your profile? - Nosocialism, on 04/11/2008, -4/+2The vast majority of these types of pledges are put together by a "Bundler". Here's how it works:
Company puts out a memo that says: "We've decided that it's in our best interest to donate to X politician and we would like to know who's on board. The suggested donation is $2300.00, BTW, we're giving you a $3000.00 bonus on your next check, if you want to participate, respond to this email letting us know to use part of that cash." Now obviously, you can just take your bonus and give nothing, but Management will know that you won't "Play Ball" so you're marked as "Not a Team Player". So how many of these guys are going to say no?
The Bundler now takes this cash to Obama and says, yeah our employees got together and decided to contribute to your campaign. Here's the list of employees that gave. If you as an employee decided to give $1000.00 to McCain, no one would know about it, because your just an individual, your donation was not part of a "Bundled" Package and you're not required to state who you work for when you give your donation.
None of this matters because Obama can't and won't win, I go into this in detail on my site. - dinot, on 04/11/2008, -3/+1If Hillary gets elected, she'll fill her cabinet with raging feminists! If McCain gets elected, he'll fill his cabinet with old man juice!
See, I can play this game too! - Nosocialism, on 04/11/2008, -3/+1Obama cannot and will not win this election. He might win the race against Hillary, but he definitely will not win the race against McCain. Check out my site for the complete story.
- dinot, on 04/11/2008, -3/+1What the hell does that even mean? If they chew him up, he won't win the nomination, so why should the Republicans care? And if they TRY to chew him up, and he STILL wins the nomination, then it means he's indestructible and the Republicans are *****.
- Kangalanatolian, on 04/10/2008, -8/+6There was SO much more to Ron Paul than the war, but yea that was a biggie.
If this poll holds more than hot air, it might be because they still haven't found out that McCains Psychiatrist is his old Vietcong prison camp warden. - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -6/+3No one dies in an abortion.
- Coven, on 04/11/2008, -10/+7You dolt. These are individual donations from EMPLOYEES at these companies, not the companies themselves.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -7/+4Yeah, that's about what I expected....
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -4/+1I wish that were true. I think it would be good for the nation to have those three plus Rev Wright on the SCOTUS.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -7/+4If Obama gets elected he will appoint Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or Louie Farrakhan to the Supreme Court.
-
Show 51 - 57 of 57 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is