digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

See the original image at prisonplanet.com

Obama Calls For National Civilian Stasi

prisonplanet.com — Presidential front-runner Barack Obama has called for a "civilian national security force" as powerful as the U.S. military, comments that were ignored by the vast majority of the corporate media but compared by one journalist to the Nazi Hitler Youth.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • paralentor, on 07/17/2008, -3/+44Fisa was his entre to his true colors. Form a fascists Patorean Guard and the people
    might start to wake up.
    • yellowcakewalk, on 07/18/2008, -1/+14FISA was important, but he already showed his true colors when he voted to extend the PATRIOT act on March 2 2006. Few noticed it then, because he was not a candidate at the time.
      • Cryptocracy, on 08/17/2008, -1/+12Obama Economic Controller Is Skull and Bones Member
        Austan 'The Ghoul' Goolsbee, Yale '91

        Obama's Global Poverty act is in accordance with the U.N. Millennium Agenda....

        Zbigniew Brzezinski is Obama's foreign policy advisor.....

        Michelle Obama is a member of the The Chicago Council on Global Affairs....

        Obama is distant cousin of Cheney- (that's important to these elites)

        Obama kisses AIPAC's butt...

        FISA was no first for Obama... the warning signs have been visible for quite some time. Obama faithful blinded by the charisma choose to not see the truth hidden in plain sight.
      • catcher6250, on 07/31/2008, -0/+1If he doesn't vote for the Patriot Act he will be smeared to hell by the Republicans for supporting terrorism.
    • rhabd0mancer, on 07/18/2008, -3/+1You idiots are afraid of AmeriCorps?

      My god you are a bunch of pussies.
  • Cryptocracy, on 08/17/2008, -2/+44WTF???? this guy is straight out of Orwell's 1984!!!
  • JKap, on 07/17/2008, -3/+27I HEART BIG BROTHER!
  • kemp34, on 07/17/2008, -1/+30Is Obama trying to lose his base of support?
    • floatingorb, on 07/17/2008, -1/+20Sadly, probably not. Stupid sheeple.
    • ZZeke, on 07/17/2008, -1/+23they're completely star-struck already. He could kill babies on stage and they would probably applaud at this point. Talk to an Obamite about why you don't like him as president and they'll either bite your head off or run away screaming with their hands over their ears...
    • Pssdoff, on 07/17/2008, -2/+19I think a few people are starting to wake up and see Obama for who he really is instead of some rock star who will make the skies rain gold once elected.

      The FISA bill, the $900 billion G.P.A., his fawning for AIPAC, and his dream creating a citizen stormtrooper army of domestic “Terrorism Liaison Officers” will surely cause those who are paying attention to reevaluate just who it is they are supporting.

      But they would have to turn off their TV first, and we all know that will never happen...
    • Izult, on 07/18/2008, -0/+6Don't write them all off just yet, there are those who are realizing that the people who have been talking about how Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin might actually know wtf they're talking about after all.
    • NonServium, on 07/18/2008, -0/+2The elections are rigged and Obama knows this. Thus, of course he doesn't care about losing his public base of support. It's the private base of support who control the election machines that matters.
  • cashman57, on 07/17/2008, -3/+32If you add up all of the money he plans to spend you come up with a deepening problem.
    This program would cost a trillion dollars a year, and all of that would be deficit spending. Nothing about cutting the budget, reducing the size and scope of government, or anything about what needs to happen to stop the impending economic collapse.
    He is part of the problem. He has voted for deficit budgets, emergency spending, and keeping some spending off-budget.He wants to ramp up our military, increase spending and taxation and thinks giving more power to the federal reserve is a solution.
  • Cryptocracy, on 08/17/2008, -1/+30and the campaign has removed the text from the transcript of the speech. how telling is that? http://digg.com/politics/Obama_s_Big_Brother_vanis ...
  • wakananda, on 07/17/2008, -1/+30This CFR puppet is tipping his hand now. The corporate media clearly performed it's function by filtering this monumental proposal out of public consciousness (how do you not report on the proposal, by a presidential candidate, to create domestic national police force - of at-risk youth?!- "more powerful than the US military?"). Perhaps this next tightening-of-the-noose was meant to be offered as a "solution" to the next "crisis" - but the rent-boy-in-chief wanted to claim it as his own visionary plan.
  • Heysal, on 07/17/2008, -2/+34REAL Americans won't be voting for the Reich's chosen few this time around (Obama, McCain).
    REAL Americans will be voting for independent candidates or just writing in Ron Paul.

    To vote for Nazis and War Mongrels, or anyone else who thinks a treasonous vote in the house is okay for whatever reason is in itself an act of treason - we don't need people who do that claiming to be fellow countrymen.
    • yellowcakewalk, on 07/18/2008, -2/+10Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr. There are several choices.
    • Minarchian, on 07/18/2008, -0/+2Sorry but Paul has to register a "declaration of intent" to run as a write-in within most States.

      As far as I know Paul has not signed the bottom line to run as a write-in anywhere.

      Here in NC, for example (pdf file): http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/GetDocument.aspx?id=31 ...
  • Gavin, on 07/17/2008, -1/+27So this is the "change" he was talking about..
    • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -0/+1Change we can count on...
      to put Americans in internment camps.

      Score one for the gipper, or rather, David Rockefeller!
  • Fangsinmybeard, on 07/17/2008, -1/+24Now we know he is another totalitarian.
  • AgainstObama, on 07/17/2008, -1/+19If McCain had said this, it would be all over the front page of Digg.
  • JimboX13, on 07/17/2008, -1/+16I bailed on Obama with FISA, this just reaffirms that decision, we need a unified third choice. I'd rather vote nader but I'll vote barr if everyone can get on the same page.
    • floatingorb, on 07/18/2008, -4/+7Barr is a big 'plant' that still hasn't recounted his position on prohibition. He's just another dufus we get to pick from .... Try McKinney, Baldwin, or Paul if you want to do some good by sticking it in their eye.
    • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -0/+3What do people think of Baldwin? I wish Paul would have done the right thing and ran as an independent. Why stay on with the Republican party? It doesn't make any sense whatsoever. It's a burning ship.
      • Izult, on 07/18/2008, -0/+3He's a little too "churchy" for my tastes personally and i have doubts that he would be able to put personal beliefs aside and would let them color his "policy" instead of being true to the Constitution.
    • GerWaiian, on 07/21/2008, -0/+0Any independent speakers out there worth giving 2 cents about? Wouldn't now be the time instead the pondering? Worth the digging?
  • Forcough, on 07/18/2008, -1/+15http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df2p6867_pw&eur

    At approximately the 16:50 mark he says:

    We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
  • SaraLiberty, on 08/16/2008, -2/+15"Barack Obama - The change candidate" (puke) How many times has he changed his position so far? Such stupid, meaningless soundbite sloganry for a dumbed down TV conditioned non thinking American public who eat it up like peanut butter.

    "National Civilian Security Force"

    ***** sacrificing our lives and human existence on this planet dying for their wars for profit for rich elite banksters, military industrial complex, defense industries and AIPAC. Take your "National Civilian Security Force" and shove it up your ***** Barrack Obama. How about you start by signing your own precious kids up for it? Lead by example. Almost forgot, you're not a leader you are a MISleader. My bad

    Why don't they form a "national politician security force" ? Have presidents, "elected officials", con-gress, senate, and likewise politician sell-outs drafted to go fight the fraudulent, criminal, murderous wars they fund with billions of dollars of our hard-earned tax money. Have politicians fight and die for the horrific acts of state sponsored terrorism 'wars' these bought sold & paid for charlatans support, encourage and approve. Draft the ***** politicians. Work for the money you bleed off our backs. We just wanna live our lives in peace. You want war? Go fight it yourself. Take your kids with you.

    We need to form a National Civilian Security Force to REVOLT against these slick talking traitors and criminal deceivers. We should organize a 'National Civilian Revolution" to take to the streets in the millions. Take our government, Constitution and country back from the fascists that hi-jacked it out from underneath us. THAT I will sign up for.

    Know Your Enemy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LvwzanCLCo
  • PolishLogic, on 07/18/2008, -1/+9Coming up:

    "Report any suspicious or questionable activity to your local Civil Security Prefect so a thorough investigation can be made."

    The one day you'll wake up, the house next door will be empty, and you'll wonder why the Millers never mentioned they were moving.
    • Izult, on 07/18/2008, -0/+5Damnit!!! they never returned my drill either.
  • wreckosaurus, on 07/18/2008, -5/+4So what is the definition of sheeple, someone who believes anything that's put in front of them, without critically thinking. I suppose everyone who reads prison planet qualifies then. This was completely taken out of context, there's a reason nobody reported this in the real news, and it's not because of some conspiracy, it's because Obama was NOT calling for a "Hitler Youth." Here's what he was actually talking about:

    "FDR not only enlisted Americans to create employment, he targeted that service to build our infrastructure and conserve our environment. JFK not only called on a new generation, he made their service a bridge to the developing world, and a bright light of American values in the darkest days of the Cold War.

    Today, AmeriCorps - our nation's network of local, state and national service programs - has 75,000 slots. I know firsthand the quality of these programs. My wife Michelle once left her job at a law firm to be the founding director of an AmeriCorps program in Chicago that trains young people for careers in public service. These programs invest Americans in their communities and their country. They tap America's greatest resource - our citizens.

    As President, I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots, and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their efforts connected to a common purpose. People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem - they are the answer.

    We'll send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We'll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods. We'll enlist veterans to help other vets find jobs and support, and to be there for our military families. And we'll also grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. "

    Oh NO, not the peace corp!!!! Clearly a NWO CFR scam to enslave mankind. But digg this down, because you don't want to hear the truth, just some ***** Alex Jones spouts.
    • ReidFleming, on 07/18/2008, -4/+1Good luck with this post. Having actual facts mixed in here with the foaming-mouthed, functionally-illiterate, deliberately-obtuse will probably not help very much. I'll digg you anyway and bury the story.
    • AgainstObama, on 07/21/2008, -0/+1Because this is different than his "national security force". If you can't see it then you are another Obama sheep.

  • shadoweva09, on 07/18/2008, -1/+2"Just as well-funded (as the military)" Actual money must no longer apply in government then, of course this entire article seems questionable though.
  • JKap, on 07/18/2008, -2/+4Ze naZional Zivilian Zecurity Force!
  • tufftugg, on 07/18/2008, -1/+5 Now that is some scary sh*t. Looks like your screwed America, one way or the other. Or should I say one choice or the other.
  • CoolHandLuke70, on 07/18/2008, -1/+7Freaking amazing! Red alert folks!
  • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -0/+4Now people who hate their neighbors can join up. Now that's change you can count on!
  • MarkEarhart, on 07/18/2008, -1/+5If that f__cker can do it so can I!!! I call on every patriotic American to stop paying income tax completely and invest that money into a civilian organized and operated militia as defined and protected by the second amendment. Such a militia should answer to no one at any level of government. The only loyalty for this proposed militia should be that which we owe each other as fellow American citizens in uniting for our common defense against tyranny from ANY source, foreign or domestic.
    • Parapadrifter, on 07/18/2008, -1/+3I definately like the idea of a Nation-wide militia, made of people who will defend the constitution and bill of rights when the cronies in Washington make it impossible to.
    • GerWaiian, on 07/21/2008, -0/+0I say stop paying taxes and invest in to a new candidate! Michael Badnarik has my support !
  • Hangly, on 07/18/2008, -0/+4Wow, that's really... odd.
  • citizenfury, on 07/18/2008, -4/+2After having been concerned, I decided to look into this.

    Context is everything here. The entirety of this speech is about service.

    The entire paragraph from which the quote is drawn reads thus:
    "We're gonna send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We'll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, and to be there for our military families. And we're gonna grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

    Read the full speech at:
    http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2046706/posts
  • iPirate, on 07/18/2008, -6/+2So... this is where all the nutjobs hang out.
    • MarkEarhart, on 07/18/2008, -1/+1Yeah come on in and we'll have one more. If you're nutty enough you could run for public office!!!
      • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -1/+0Pirate,

        You're obviously interested in hearing a second opinion on the state of the union. Otherwise, you wouldn't be here. But if you're not interested in a true intellectual conversation with people who understand history, go back to COMATOSE and listen to mainstream media, Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, Chris "TeeBall" Matthews, Rush Limbaugh, Vanity and Foams at the mouth for David Rockefeller and the New World Order.

        Go back to your TV and get lulled back to SLEEP by reruns of the 5 hour All-Star Game and an in-depth discussion over whether Brett Favre is or isn't going to be a Packer next year. Oh, the drama!

        Go back to sleep, NUMB-nuts. The adults are having a d-i-s-c-u-s-s-i-o-n.

  • Regbooker, on 07/18/2008, -0/+5HA! good luck seeing this reach the front page. Specially with all his acolytes at Digg trying to filter reality.
  • AlwaysAwake, on 07/18/2008, -1/+4Blackwater, DynaCorp, and others already on the job. Mission Accomplished !!! Ask the Katrina victims, who showed up first in New Orleans. Or the HAARP midwest fllood victims.
  • macwac, on 07/18/2008, -0/+2*deleted question* - didn't see that citizenfury answered it. This is taken severely out of context.. (my question was why would you need a national security force when your bringing the entire army back from Iraq)
    • MarkEarhart, on 07/18/2008, -0/+2The fool has waffled about bringing our troops home. As for a "National Security Force" we already have the need for and definition of one in the second amendment.
    • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -0/+1That's a really good point. If he is running on a platform of bringing home the troops (and let's face it, that is the only reason people are voting for him) then the troops would be here in America protecting us against attacks, enemies, etc. etc.

      If you see the clip that this speech is taken from, you can see that the only thing he says that has any resonance with the audience is that we need to bring our troops home.

      Once again, they create the problem, and offer the solution.
  • DocOctavius, on 07/18/2008, -3/+1First of all, the comparison to the Nazi party is unwarranted- he's suggesting a civilian controlled security organization, in contrast to a government controlled security organization, such as Homeland Security... he's essentially calling on us to act for ourselves instead of relying on the Government. You guys are so ***** paranoid- there's never been any situation we can compare this to, especially Nazi Germany- it's unfair to compare the 2 countries, populations, leaders or anything having to do with our current state and WWII Germany. Get out and volunteer is what his point is. I'm disappointed in the lack of trust, even though I understand it. Obviously this guy is just doing his best to come up with ideas that will help- he's only human. He's also the smartest guy in a position to win, so you can do what you want, I'm using plain old logic. Vote for the best candidate.
    • MarkEarhart, on 07/18/2008, -0/+2Nazi Germany was mild compared to the decline of civil liberties and descent into tyranny we have seen since 9/11. What planet have you been on?
    • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -0/+0In response to your statement that "it's unfair to compare the 2 countries, populations, leaders, or anything having to do with our current state and WWII Germany"

      Are you a CIA operative? Are you blind? Are you mental? That is not a sane statement. Are you living in another state? Perhaps that's the case, because if you are living in the United States that statement is the most unfounded statement I have heard in a really long time.

      Is this Karl Rove?

      Perhaps you live in a different state altogether. The state of DENIAL. Wake up! Turn off the boob tube before you turn into one yourself.
  • chessmasterjoe, on 07/18/2008, -1/+5I have already volunteered. I am part of the militia as are every able bodied citizen. I am ready to defend my rights and yours. I don't need Obama or any politician to start some quasi military organization.
  • filmbuff2008, on 07/18/2008, -1/+1A civilian national security force is not AmeriCorps or PeaceCorps. They do not deal with security. So, we take "a civilian national security force" at face value, and at face value that has never ever been about freedom. It always tied into fascism. So we can deal in, "Did it ever occur to you..." until the cows come home but there are no magic what ifs. If anyone is "projecting" it is you, Brew. You are trying interpret it in a way that is completely inaccurate. Civilian national security force has never been AmeriCorps or PeaceCorps. What you have to understand is that people of Obama's ilk seem to let things slip once and awhile about what they really want to do to the country. That's a fact.

    Forget the left-right false paradigm you obviously buy into. Take what they say at face value, and even look beyond what they say once and awhile, look at what they do. Because at the end of the day whether he says he's going to do it or not doesn't matter as much as him actually doing it. Bush didn't say a lot. He never told the American public his plans but he did them. You're damned right he did and we are all paying for it right now.

    So I'd encourage you to move beyond naivete and towards truth. And understand that you are not going to get the truth from Main Stream Media. Listen, Operation Mockingbird was in the 1950's. Can you imagine how much better and sophisticated they have gotten at the lies? These people do not want to be your leaders. They want to be your lords.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.