9 Comments
- inactive, on 12/25/2007, -0/+7You can almost smell the fear coming from the MSM and CFR lackeys.
- PSWTyrant, on 12/25/2007, -0/+6The MSM is worried that their payday is coming to an end. Government is paying lots of journalists to support positions. This is something they perfected overseas but are doing domestically too!
WAKE UP PEOPLE! An unlawful government will only get worse!
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=4628
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-06 ...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1130-07.ht ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/01/politics/01propa ...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/02/04/web.us/i ... - Fabc001, on 12/25/2007, -0/+6The Paul campaign has exposed the MSM as total frauds and liars. The price the MSM have paid in bogus smearing has been huge so far for them. Who is in control of the MSM? they are like a Kamikaze outfit, they are turning so many people away from themselves that it is now becoming really sad (not)
- JCM0165, on 12/25/2007, -0/+5See American Thinker backtracking on this issue
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/12/neonaz ... - volksgardencom, on 12/25/2007, -0/+4damn, cross another supposed to be news source off my list of reads
- grunk, on 12/25/2007, -0/+2Link to the Times article. Comments are being posted now. The author is getting savaged.
- Asure, on 12/25/2007, -0/+2Ordinarily I'm no big fan of lawsuits, but in this case it would seem appropriate. Largely baseless evidence for such broad accusations in the New York Times no less! sheesh!
- grunk, on 12/25/2007, -0/+2The "Paper of Record" pulled the "comments" section from this article. It's getting harder and harder to read the Times.
- MarkThomas, on 12/25/2007, -0/+2I suspect that Virginia's article was a trial balloon. Someone wants to throw some dirt at the campaign to see if it can stick. Ron Paul supporters should demonstrate that it can't.
Thanks, Grizzlegriz, for the research. I suggest we all drill down to check the facts, then complain to the NY Times about the disservice Virginia did to their publication with this piece. She is certainly allowed to be suspicious of candidates for office, but she shouldn't promote allegations as the truth.



What is Digg?