Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
Neocons Admit that "War On Terror" Is a Hoax
prisonplanet.com — Key war on terror architect Douglas Feith has now confirmed Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Wesley Clark in admitting that the so-called War on Terror is a hoax.
tx78704- 69 diggs
- digg it
- LoneRanger85, on 05/07/2008, -15/+7Guess we can shut it all down then and go home. And if you're right there will be no mushroom cloud over your city.
- ZZeke, on 05/07/2008, -7/+10Ok Cheney, whatever you say. I sure am glad we stopped Iraq from nuking us, though. Especially after Saddam helped Osama attack the twin towers and all.
- LoneRanger85, on 05/08/2008, -11/+6Yeah, and the children in Iraq who were locked in prison are glad too. As are the women who were sent to rape rooms, the people who went to torture chambers, the people who were tossed off buildings and had their tongue cut out. As for the million people Saddam killed -- too late for them to be glad.
- yellowcakewalk, on 05/08/2008, -6/+8Are you talking about the USA occupation torture rooms and rape rooms? Or were you talking about Ronald Reagan's best buddy Saddam Hussein's torture rooms and rape rooms? Remember, the occupation has killed far more people than Reagan's bestest buddy ever did.
- ZZeke, on 05/08/2008, -1/+4Damn straight. Saddam never wiped out 500,000 Iraqis. But GW/Cheney sure did.
- yellowcakewalk, on 05/08/2008, -6/+8Are you talking about the USA occupation torture rooms and rape rooms? Or were you talking about Ronald Reagan's best buddy Saddam Hussein's torture rooms and rape rooms? Remember, the occupation has killed far more people than Reagan's bestest buddy ever did.
- LoneRanger85, on 05/08/2008, -11/+6Yeah, and the children in Iraq who were locked in prison are glad too. As are the women who were sent to rape rooms, the people who went to torture chambers, the people who were tossed off buildings and had their tongue cut out. As for the million people Saddam killed -- too late for them to be glad.
- chicofaraby, on 05/08/2008, -3/+7Are they going to use one of Iraq's invisible nukes? 'Cause, those are the worst kind of nuke. First Iraq got 'em, then Iran.
- ZZeke, on 05/07/2008, -7/+10Ok Cheney, whatever you say. I sure am glad we stopped Iraq from nuking us, though. Especially after Saddam helped Osama attack the twin towers and all.
- yellowcakewalk, on 05/08/2008, -4/+12Finally Tonto says something that makes sense. Yes, it is time to shut it down and go home. The mushroom cloud ***** was just ***** and we've known it for years.
- ZZeke, on 05/08/2008, -1/+6Stonedranger just thinks it's cool to kill Muslims because they hate us for our freedom.
- swrostmore, on 05/08/2008, -6/+2Does anybody know if Jones has released any CDs with his rants on them? I've heard him play recorded rants with dramatic background music on his radio show, so I know he's got it - can I buy it anywhere? When he gets himself all worked up, he's one of the greatest living comedians IMO.
- chicofaraby, on 05/08/2008, -2/+5I gotta agree that he's funnier than other insane people like Coulter or Limbaugh. They're too far into the creepy to be as funny as Jones.
- bullcutter, on 05/08/2008, -5/+2First off, prisonplanet sucks ass. Too many flashy and popup advertisements for too poor quality of information.
Second off, its an advertisement for a book.
Third off, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz didn't admit ***** about *****. I don't know how whoever submitted this can even make the connection that this article somehow implies "neocons" are "admitting that the so-called War on Terror is a hoax."
Buried as spam. There should be no room for product placement on Digg, no matter how craftily it is disguised as real media.- ZZeke, on 05/09/2008, -1/+2like I told you last week, if you expect to rid digg of advertising, your work will never be done...
Why don't you start with all the ads for apple, xbox, playstation3, etc. - they're on the front page every day, you don't even have to search for them like you did to find this one. The fact that you actually have to go out of your way to come here and tell us about how much you hate prison planet totally nullifies your point about advertising. There's not a site on the net which does not advertise or sell products related to the site. Maybe you should try to rid the entire internet of advertising while you're at it....oh, wait - that's how 99.9% of all websites earn enough income to stay online...
That's certainly a new angle, though - I'll give you a gold star for originality, but it's gonna get old real quick.- bullcutter, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1"Why don't you start with all the ads for apple, xbox, playstation3, etc. - they're on the front page every day, "
Yes but the difference is this is an advertisement under the guise of real media. Its trickery and deception, just another weak, unoriginal attempt at getting money from the young, gullible & overpriveledged, making whoever is trying to hawk the product no better than a con artist.
The front page ads and the ads on the sides of the pages aren't being disguised as anything else, so they are OK.- ZZeke, on 05/10/2008, -0/+1Obviously you miss the point. There are ARTICLES on the front page every day which hawk the products I mentioned, to name a few - I'm not talking about the actual ads on the front page, I'm talking about exactly the same thing you're trying to say about this post. But you probably already knew that, and you're just playing dumb with me.
- bullcutter, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1"Why don't you start with all the ads for apple, xbox, playstation3, etc. - they're on the front page every day, "
- ZZeke, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1PS: "Spam" is something which comes across your screen completely unsolicited, not something you seek out and then comment on. If you're going to call yourself "bullcutter", maybe you should think about limiting the amount of complete ***** you spread around - nobody likes a hypocrite, but then again, something tells me you're not here to be liked. If you keep it up, you should really consider changing that to "*****", it would be much more appropriate.
- bullcutter, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1tx78704 or prisonplanet is using Digg to spam for products, period.
"you should really consider changing that to "*****", it would be much more appropriate."
wow, you know i've never heard that before! its just as original and clever as the rest of your brilliant commentary.- ZZeke, on 05/10/2008, -1/+1I can point you to numerous submissions from prison planet and infowars which clearly do not endorse any product in any way - but you know where to find them just as you knew how to find this one, because you CHOSE to come here on your own free will (thus negating the spam argument). Do you post the same type of comments on threads from other sources, when they refer to a product such as a book or a movie? My guess is no, and I'm not even going to waste my time checking your profile, because you've already made it clear that you're here because you hate prisonplanet, so stop wasting our time with pointless accusations of spam, and try debating the issues. You're certainly not the first to cry spam around here, so let me give you a hint - there's nothing you can do about it. There's lot's of ***** articles from ***** sources on digg that I hate, too - but I'm certainly not going to ***** my time away just to ***** others off with my useless opinion.
I'm not wasting my time with you anymore. Come back with something besides your opinion of prisonplanet - like maybe how you feel about the "war on terror" or the issue that's actually being discussed in the post to begin with.- bullcutter, on 05/10/2008, -0/+1"You're certainly not the first to cry spam around here, so let me give you a hint - there's nothing you can do about it. "
ahh but i AM doing something about it, am i not?
"but I'm certainly not going to ***** my time away just to ***** others off with my useless opinion."
... but you just did, except I'm not ***** : )
but you're right, why should i care if you want to waste your money on a work of fiction posing as nonfiction that is trying to capitalize on the fears and petty hatreds of the junior conspiracy detectives? - ZZeke, on 05/10/2008, -0/+1OK let me fill you in...
Although I read infowars/prisonplanet, and find some of the information useful or interesting, I don't buy stuff from the sites. Never have, and probably never will. Also, I've never ran to the store (or clicked over to amazon) to buy a book or movie being hawked in one of the articles. For that matter, I don't click on internet ads - ever, no matter where they come from. You're barking up the wrong tree here.
Now let's play cut and paste since it seems to be your favorite game....
"ahh but i AM doing something about it, am i not?"
- not really, it's just me and you here. If you consider this time well spent, then I'd hate to see what you do when you're bored.
"... but you just did, except I'm not ***** : )"
If I was really trying to ***** you off, you'd be ***** off. I'm just responding to what you said, and pointing out the *****.
"but you're right, why should i care if you want to waste your money on a work of fiction posing as nonfiction that is trying to capitalize on the fears and petty hatreds of the junior conspiracy detectives?"
Like I said, I'm not buying anything. There's nothing petty or hateful going on here. The lies and deceptions of the neocon leaders are nothing to take lightly, unless you feel that unnecessary loss of life on a massive scale in the name of global US hegemony is insignificant. Now, if you want to discuss your petty hatred of prisonplanet, because you don't like the message it conveys, we can do that. Also, If you were trying to belittle me with the "junior" comment, you're totally wasting your time. Vietnam was still going on when I was born. Unless you were born in the 60's, then you're the junior in this thread. I just glanced at your profile to check your age, but obviously, like most haters, you're the "private" type.
- bullcutter, on 05/10/2008, -0/+1"You're certainly not the first to cry spam around here, so let me give you a hint - there's nothing you can do about it. "
- ZZeke, on 05/10/2008, -1/+1I can point you to numerous submissions from prison planet and infowars which clearly do not endorse any product in any way - but you know where to find them just as you knew how to find this one, because you CHOSE to come here on your own free will (thus negating the spam argument). Do you post the same type of comments on threads from other sources, when they refer to a product such as a book or a movie? My guess is no, and I'm not even going to waste my time checking your profile, because you've already made it clear that you're here because you hate prisonplanet, so stop wasting our time with pointless accusations of spam, and try debating the issues. You're certainly not the first to cry spam around here, so let me give you a hint - there's nothing you can do about it. There's lot's of ***** articles from ***** sources on digg that I hate, too - but I'm certainly not going to ***** my time away just to ***** others off with my useless opinion.
- bullcutter, on 05/09/2008, -1/+1tx78704 or prisonplanet is using Digg to spam for products, period.
- ZZeke, on 05/09/2008, -1/+2like I told you last week, if you expect to rid digg of advertising, your work will never be done...
- robbymcdobby, on 05/08/2008, -2/+3Breaking news...
Captain Obvious has also confirmed the reports that the "War on Terror" is a sham. - whitecracker, on 05/08/2008, -0/+1I agree with Bullcutter. He doesn't really "admit it was a hoax" more like he admits their goal was to destabilize the area. Presumably they believe -- wrongly in my opinion -- that this will disturb terror groups, etc.
http://www.imperfectunion.com- ZZeke, on 05/10/2008, -0/+1Considering the fact that the neocon administration never told us that the goal was to destabilize the area - in fact they told us exactly the opposite - and the fact that all of this was done in the name of the "war on terror", one could logically assume that the "war on terror" was indeed a hoax, or at the very least used disingenuously, in order to garner support for military actions which would destabilize the region indefinitely, with no clear goal in sight.
However, you are absolutely right for calling the headline into question. Nowhere does it say that any neocon "admitted it was a hoax" directly. It's definitely inferred from the information obtained. Personally though, I wouldn't be surprised to hear them laugh about it at ***** parties, how easy it was to pull a bait and switch on most of the world - and get away with it to this day.
- ZZeke, on 05/10/2008, -0/+1Considering the fact that the neocon administration never told us that the goal was to destabilize the area - in fact they told us exactly the opposite - and the fact that all of this was done in the name of the "war on terror", one could logically assume that the "war on terror" was indeed a hoax, or at the very least used disingenuously, in order to garner support for military actions which would destabilize the region indefinitely, with no clear goal in sight.
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by