10 Comments
- jwaf, on 08/12/2008, -0/+11Mukasey says "his predecessors in the Justice Department were breaking the law" and "doesn't mean anyone should be held accountable" "not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime" Is he retarded?
Thank you Chuck Shumer and DIFi! You ***** helped put this puppet in power! - mr0nine2five, on 08/12/2008, -0/+8Damn, I need "Digg Friends." And probably needed to reword the title for my own submission of this story.
From the update: "Michael Mukasey explains that just because his predecessors in the Justice Department were breaking the law with their hiring processes doesn’t mean anyone should be held accountable: 'not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime.'"
Man, I wish WE could use that defense, but no.... - inactive, on 04/03/2009, -0/+7How is "negative publicity" enough of a repercussion? I wish I could have used that as a child. "Well, you caught me, Mom, and now Dad knows everything, too. Isn't that enough?"
- ordig, on 08/12/2008, -0/+6Impeach these ***** ***** NOW! goddammit
- hawkeye17, on 08/12/2008, -0/+6The law doesn't apply to Bushies apparently. Enjoy your legacy Mukasey.
- inactive, on 04/03/2009, -0/+5Exactly. The literal definition of a crime is a violation of the law.
- SatoriSeeker, on 08/12/2008, -0/+5"Not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime,” Mukasey said.
PLEASE ELABORATE GOOD SIR! I am interested in knowing which violations of the law I can partake of and not have it be considered a crime!
Sounds a little like "If the president does it, it’s not illegal." Nixon would be proud. - inactive, on 08/13/2008, -0/+2We shouldn't let Mookie get off with just "negative publicity". A few decades in prison with the rest of the crime family would be more appropriate.
- Arguman, on 08/14/2008, -0/+1*jaw drops*
- inactive, on 08/13/2008, -1/+2Because that would be accountability or taking responsibility, and the Bush administration is deathly allergic to honor and integrity.



What is Digg?