What is Digg?135 Comments
- izzybr, on 11/20/2007, -1/+86Dear Mr. McClellan,
Thanks, however, WE ALL ***** KNEW THIS ALREADY. Now why don't you publish some proof that we can actually use in something like an impeachment - dumpyhumpy, on 11/20/2007, -1/+56IMPEACH
THE
PRESIDENT - SeethisPass, on 11/20/2007, -0/+45Hmmm, All of the presidents men? interesting.
- jonjon602, on 11/20/2007, -1/+37good thing Scooter was only convicted of perjury (no double jeopardy) we can still get Rove, Bush, Cheney and Scooter on Treason !! IMPEACH!
- cortlandjim, on 11/20/2007, -1/+36Mr. McClellan better find a hole to hide in. he might have an Accident (wink, wink!!)
- lhbaker, on 11/20/2007, -3/+36Let's see how long it takes for the Right to descredit him. If I were Scott McClellan, I would avoid airport restrooms.
- wendelgee2, on 11/20/2007, -3/+32The selfless whistleblower is dead. Now you politely resign and then write a book to make a million bucks in exchange for the truth.
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -0/+25The cynic in me says there's no way he didn't know the truth, he's just trying to distance himself and possibly throw the administration under the bus for personal reasons.
- ilves7, on 11/20/2007, -0/+24well, according to her she was and some operations she had been previously involved in that were still ongoing were jeapordized.
- dumpyhumpy, on 11/20/2007, -0/+20umm i don't know... lets start with
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
and if anybody outside of the whitehouse did it, it would be TREASON. (Which is punishable by death...)
theres probably a couple more in-between - 4bit, on 11/20/2007, -1/+20According to her in several interviews she WAS undercover at the time.
Even if we put that aisde, outing an undercover agent at ANY time, puts people who once associated with them at risk. THey may have had contacts in other places that were NOT outed yet. - videozine, on 11/20/2007, -1/+19Would someone give the President a blow job already so we can impeach the bastard all ready??
- manfromfuture, on 11/20/2007, -2/+18What a Crock. People like this guy, Colin Powell, George Tenet, all had their chance to do the right thing, and they blew it. I don't want to hear their stories confirming what everyone already knows. Its too little too late.
- bjs3171, on 11/20/2007, -0/+13i'm pretty sure the book will be more than 10 words.
- sunilrkarkera, on 11/20/2007, -1/+14Great! Why didn't you speak up while in office? Congratulations! Your book will sell very well.
- lhbaker, on 11/20/2007, -2/+15It's too bad the Righties can't see the forest for the talk show hosts.
- TheSwashbuckler, on 11/20/2007, -2/+15"She wasn't an undercover agent at the time and hadn't been for 5 years....."
Actually, she was undercover. She had been out of the country on a covert assignment in the previous five years. - inactive, on 11/20/2007, -0/+12URnotheonly1= Retard
- strax, on 11/20/2007, -1/+13By this point, it seems like there is already enough evidence to through most of this administration in jail. It's like there is an entire pile, no an entire landfill, of smoking guns. Every now and then someone picks up one of them and says "look, here's another smoking gun!" and people runs around in circles crying "we got you now!" then they throw the gun back into the landfill and go on with their lives.
Face it. Nothing will happen, nobody will be prosecuted, and life will go on. - zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -1/+12http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/2007031610403 ...
She was covert at the time of the article. Also, even if she wasn't at that specific time, it ruined her ability to be one again in the future, and compromised her contacts. - dumpyhumpy, on 11/20/2007, -2/+13Ummm... what would be the non-political purpose of outing the wife of the ambassador who was sent to investigate WMDs in Niger, and came back to report that your beating of the war drums was grossly unfounded? If Bush listened to Wilson we wouldnt be in this ***** mess to begin with.
Even the most Bush loving rightwinger should be furious that she was outed when her job was to investigate Iran's nuclear program!
***** morons... - TheRealAlzabo, on 11/20/2007, -1/+12Would that hold true for blowjobs too?
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -2/+13Even if she wasn't undercover at the time of the outing, which she was.....in what crazy fantasy world is it OK to blow someone's cover for political reasons without permission?
- HellDonut, on 11/20/2007, -1/+11And to think you people once kicked Nixon out of the office for less.
- GeneralFault, on 11/20/2007, -0/+10Amazing. He takes "bbbbbut Clinton" to a whole new level. WOW. What a retard.
- khpmli, on 11/20/2007, -0/+10wouldn't that be a treason by those involved in this?
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -1/+10LOL....no, they are divisive, just like the Right. The point was that you called the Left partisan, which they are by definition, as if it was some sort of insult. It's like calling a Sentaor a "congressman". You clearly have no idea what partisan means. You didn't even get it when I pointed it out. That was my one and only point. So I will reiterate. You're a moron.
P.S.: I know a made a typo in my response. - dumpyhumpy, on 11/20/2007, -2/+11Anybody that had anything to do with outting Mrs.Plame would be removed from the whitehouse... (McClellan)...
dont let the door hit you on the way out, Mr. President... - inactive, on 11/20/2007, -0/+9And here I thought all Texans stick together.
- oldhick, on 11/20/2007, -0/+9How much you want to bet that there is nothing actionable in it???
- TheSwashbuckler, on 11/20/2007, -4/+13"Of course, this is all moot considering Plame was already working as a non-undercover official in a public environment with her name on public-releasable government documents."
You cons just can't stop lying... - lhbaker, on 11/20/2007, -0/+9S T R E T C H!
- liquidpele, on 11/20/2007, -0/+8Have you seen what happens to whistleblowers?
You have to do that to survive, because your career is through! - christor, on 11/20/2007, -0/+8Pretty much everything this president says turns out to be false in hindsight. I almost don't even care if he knew it was BS when uttered. That said, the man's a liar. He has admitted it before (when he admitted lying about whether he would replace Rumsfeld after the election), and he doesn't associate with very honorable people - who themselves bend the truth and lie all the time - Rove, Gonzalez, Addington, etc. The only question in my mind is whether Bush and his cronies will represent a stain on our nation or a grievous wound. I'm hoping for stain.
- inactive, on 11/20/2007, -1/+8The CIA instigated the Fitzgerald Inquiry. It was their complaint. Why would they allege she was outed if she was not undercover? Surely they would be the ones to know. QED.
- GeneralFault, on 11/20/2007, -3/+10These "libs hate facts" comments are getting old, funny, but old. They are especially funny when in a thread where the facts are very clearly against them. For instance when the first person says that "plame was not under cover", the neocon says "don't bother libs with 'facts'", but everyone with any real knowledge of the matter, like the director of the CIA for example or the special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald says "she was definitely undercover". Sorry, you lose.
http://news.aol.com/elections-blog/2007/03/16/cia- ... - GeneralFault, on 11/20/2007, -1/+8Don't have to. Fitzgerald already did it for us.
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -3/+10You're a moron, basied solely on the fact that you're accusing the "Left" of "being partisan".
- TheRealAlzabo, on 11/20/2007, -1/+8These people will bend reality any way they can to find a way out of admitting their scum heroes did something wrong.....it's really gross.....
- echolyean, on 11/20/2007, -0/+7True, but it's a step in the right direction if someone on the inside is finally admitting it.
- jonnyeuchre, on 11/20/2007, -0/+7
If he had stones, he wouldn't mince words. All cowards. - flaflashr, on 11/20/2007, -0/+7I guess McLellan is next to be (harmlessly) Tasered.
- MacintoshSauce, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6Hello Democrats in Congress??? IMPEACH THE IDIOT KING ALREADY! Don't forget the Puppet Master Cheney too!
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -2/+8There's NO defense for this, at all. It's ridiculous that there's a debate. Even if Plame was NOT a spy, the whole reason it was brought up was to discredit Wilson for telling the truth. I don't care if they said she was a transexual male, the purpose was still even more alarming than the outing.
- Frei, on 11/20/2007, -2/+8*****
- hawkeye17, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6If Bush was a Democrat, the Right Wing in this country would be screaming for Impeachment and a trial on Treason charges. This whole Plame thing has totally exposed the Right for what it has become, dangerous and incompetent.
- desertDenizen, on 11/20/2007, -1/+7Is Congress listening? Democratic Leadership = oxymoron.
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6Nothing like getting dugg down for asking for proof, from people who accuse the other side of being without proof.
- zeitgueist, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6The headline seems spot on with the excerpt. Though it doesn't specifically say that Bush deliberately lied, which is what most people here are taking it as. What comments are you seing that are the "truth" that are being dugg down? It's generally agreed upon that Plame was covert when outed.
- inactive, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6Those were simpler times.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 136 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is