What is Digg?51 Comments
- maxvolt, on 02/01/2008, -1/+21McCain has always worked against the conservatives...this explains why the media was having a love fest with him a little over two years ago...the fix was in via the democratic front groups like Move On.Org and Media Matters. They swooned him, set in motion the thoughts he might be John Kerry's running mate..he has never been a conservative , dont insult my intelligence and start insisting that he is. McCain also would never suck up to Bush in any fashion, he hated Bush is your memory that short? Bush had to kiss McCains ass to get some things accomplished because McCain was a swing vote...man wake up for crying out loud.
- globetrecker1, on 02/01/2008, -0/+18Go figures. I am so tired of McCain and his "My friends.." turrets-like phrase. Did anyone watch him at the California GOP debate, smirking and smiling and acting like a sour old man? Ugh. Our future president? I think not.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -2/+19Figures, he always looked like an @ss to me.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -1/+17I coulda told ya this in 2001. Remember when the Republicans had 50 Senators + Cheney to control the Senate and the jeffords jellyfish exacted all sorts of concessions from the dims to change his registration from a theoretical "R" to an "I" ??? That was the headline, but the real story was in the fine print - how jumpin' jimmy had to act in haste because the dims were also engaged in horse trading with McAmnesty so if jeffords held out for a bigger bribe, the AZ RINO would be the one to score the choice committee assignments and other inducements. Also, up to the point of the 2001 benchmark, McAmnesty's voting record was with the dims more than half the time. I damn near puked when he spoke of "reaching across the aisle" in the debates. To whom? The Republicans?
When these guys were having their trial balloons floated and were being lionized in the MSM, I was telling people McAmnesty and rudy the red were no more Republicans than Joe Lieberman and much less principled.
Romney is no prize, but unless he can somehow derail the McAmnesty travesty, a libtard dimocrap will be in the Oval Office next year, no matter which nominal party wins the position in November. - maxvolt, on 02/01/2008, -2/+18So all you phony conservatives who are still trying to convince the rest of us real conservatives with a brains we are wrong about McCain should feel pretty stupid about now. Thanks for being stupid and putting this guy on top...I am going to vote for the Democrat now and the rationale is simple: Clearly we have some really dumb people in the republican party who have short memories are easily fooled by what a candidate says on the stump, without checking out how they actually vote on the issues...So by voting for the SOCIALIST Democrat candidate we will ensure that SOCIALISTS get both house in the LEGISLATURE and the EXECUTIVE Branch..this in turn will allow them to then gain the JUDICIAL branch by their appointment of liberal socialist judges. Once that happens we will be nothing more than Venezuela North. The American dream will be crushed (Government will take profits from companies), redistribution of wealth to the elitists in the United States Government (politicians)...you will get paid good wages , but almost all of it will go to the ever expanding welfare socialist Government to support unconstitutional failing and poorly run government social programs like Social Security, National Health Care, and Medicare. If that's not enough if you openly practice you're religious beliefs, you will be targeted for hate speech when you express the views of your creator on topics such as abortion, homosexuality, and the opposite sex. In opposition to the desires of our founders to never allow Government to have power over the PEOPLE (You do remember the We the People thing don't you?) your right to bear arms will be rescinded as the courts will be so populated as to deems that right as that of the right of the Government and not the right of the people even though the US Constitution opens with the words WE THE PEOPLE and NOT WE THE GOVERNMENT. You will work for the Government as opposed to our Government working for us..every dollar you make will go to support Government services that you voted into office under the phony political banners of compassion and don't all Americans deserve the rights to these free services? History will record this generation yours and mine as the idiots who gave up their freedoms and urinated on the graves of all those who spilled their blood on the battlefields of freedom...this is the liberal dream and I'll be damned if I will vote for a phony republican to be the turning point in that disaster, let history record that it all collapsed under the control of the DEMOCRATS...I applaud your stupidity and now you will get exactly what your ignorance deserves.
- jakeson2, on 02/01/2008, -0/+13Almost all of the previous posters have it right on McCain. He is closer to the democrat party than he is the Republican party. Strange,that no one remembers when he and 4 democrat senators acted in "bad faith and poor judgment" when they accepted (bribes?) from Keating in the savings and loan debacle? I call it criminal activity. But that only happens to a conservative. When it happens to a liberal, it is "bad faith and poor judgment". I won't vote for McCain willingly. And I will hate both parties equally if he gets nominated. Before that officially happens I will only hate the Clinton party of liars and crooks. Democrats of course.
- these3remain, on 02/01/2008, -1/+14Most conservatives will be holding their noses when they vote in November. I have always stated that the mainstream media wants McCain because he is a democrat anyway. So if Hillary/Obama wins or if McCain wins, it's a win-win for liberals anyway. Any conservative choice that existed withdrew or was buried. I don't like Romney but he's less repulsive than McCain.
- maxvolt, on 02/01/2008, -1/+13He is worse than that, he is a total fraud and has managed to split the republican party. Im not saying Romney is the ideal candidate, but he is about five notches higher on the conservative list than this phoney McCain.
- Serviam10, on 02/01/2008, -1/+11Bad title, it should be "Dems claim McCain wanted to become a liberal Democrat."
- Kangalanatolian, on 02/01/2008, -5/+15Yeh, he pretty much is a socialist who likes war. That is why he and Hillary do so well together. War is the ultimate big government program. They have thier job cut out for them, breaking that 100 year war record set by England and France.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -1/+10War is one of the few responsibilities that the federal government has the duty of handling, as opposed to welfare-state handouts and Marxist income redistribution schemes. To class war in with these other things is duplicitous.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -1/+10I don't think Hillary is any better; in fact I think she is worse (and she will be the nominee UNLESS Obama beats her handily from here on out).
- drz130, on 02/01/2008, -1/+10Draft John Bolton. He'll stand up to the European & UN Socialists, the terrorists, and the US open borderists.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -0/+8Bush does have a base of gullible followers. No more stupid and gullible than the Clinton Obama followers. Truth is, both parties are owned and operated by the same establishment money. McAmnesty is unelectable, the establishment money knows that, they want Hitlery in power, God Help Us.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -0/+7Here in lies the problem, we fail to assess our enemy, and we don't realize that embracing a false friend only gives him a place to plant his knife.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -2/+8***** on a stick or ***** in a bucket is still *****. Find somebody on a third party ticket.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -2/+8Considering the only proper use for lefties is to render them into fertilizer . . . yeah, it is.
- work1, on 02/01/2008, -0/+5Please, Sheila, do yourself a favor and educate yourself. What do the Democrats do, that's upholds the Bill of Rights, and our Constitution. Today, unfortunately, there seems to be no difference between the two parties. McCain is in no way a conservative, a Republican by name only. This debate is exactly what's right with America, and there's one side the Donkey, ( their not really democratic, more communistic than anything) that talks of restrictions and limiting individuality and personal growth.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -0/+5It's more than the main stream media that wants McAmnesty. It's the entire establishment government. They know McAmnesty is unelectable, this gives them an open door to run Klinton / Obama in for the final solution.
- these3remain, on 02/01/2008, -1/+6I'm afraid you are correct; we can only hope and pray that God ,in His sovereign wisdom , will use it to further His kingdom and His purposes. Maybe it's divine retribution for this nation - tough to know.
- exgop, on 02/01/2008, -1/+6If this guy gets the Republican nod Im voting for the Democrat candidate.
- Savage24, on 02/01/2008, -0/+5The democrats really didn't need McCain , he was already voting with them . He is a LIBERAL no matter how you cut it.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -1/+5I will not vote for the lesser evil. I will vote Constitution party. Why waste your vote on another pathetic Republicrat like Judas George. Judas George the lesser evil, has turned out to be the greater.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -0/+3The R's are as complicit in America's destruction as the D's are. Just look at what we have to pick from. Tell me we have a body of intelligence to trust in on the Republican side. Whores, nothing but whores. Judas George is equivalent to a Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton combined.
- libertysilver, on 02/01/2008, -7/+10All the neocons are liberal democrats.
But whatever McCain is, he is dangerous to the economy, and dangerous
for our safety.
http://knowbeforeyouvote.com - inactive, on 02/01/2008, -3/+6Most of us don't hate McCain because he isn't religious, I'm not religious at all. We hate him for his positions on tax cuts, on drilling in ANWR (which should sound an alarm for someone like you who doesn't want to support the Middle East), on campaign finance reform, on immigration, on Guantanamo. I prefer someone, like Romney, who has experience running a government and successfully running businesses. McCain is a career bureaucrat with no executive experience.
- DanThePainter, on 02/01/2008, -1/+3Yeah, but he would carry like what, eight states?
Good V.P. choice, though. - inactive, on 02/01/2008, -0/+2McAmnesty is unelectable period.
- jabboo, on 02/01/2008, -5/+7Let’s face it, none of the candidates are perfect. They never are. But McCain is the least perfect of the viable candidates. The only one left standing who can honestly be said to share most of our conservative principles is Mitt Romney. I say this as someone who has not been an active Romney supporter. If conservatives don’t unite behind Romney at this stage, and become vocal in their support for him, then they will get McCain as their Republican nominee and probably a Democrat president. And in either case, we will have a deeply flawed president.
Oh yea I almost forgot: A VOTE FOR HUCKABEE IS A VOTE FOR McCAIN! That is a fact. so Huckabee voters make your vote really count. Set aside your religious differences and Rally for Romney. Conservatives need to act now, before it is too late. McCain will not win against the Democrats you can take that to the bank. - card51short, on 02/01/2008, -1/+3"It's becoming apparent that Obama is something far worse than merely indifferent to Islamism -- he's sympathetic to it."
So, in America, a presidential candidate has to worry about his religion? - rightwingattila, on 02/02/2008, -0/+2Another Paultard with another conspiracy theory. Stop wearing the tin foil hat so tight!
- inactive, on 02/02/2008, -1/+3Here is why conservatives dislike McCain: 1) He voted against tax cuts. 2) He sponsored a bill that gutted the first amendment (McCain-Feingold). 3) He believes in global warming (junk science) 4) He wants to grant illegal combatants POW status and tear down Guantanamo Bay 5) He betrayed his country in wartime by giving secrets to the Vietnamese 6) He lies. 7) He voted for amnesty for illegal immigrants. Please don't insult us (me) by assuming that my opposition to McCain is based upon his non-evangelicalism.
- inactive, on 02/02/2008, -0/+2Ron Paul cannot win. He got 3% in Florida and didn't win New Hampshire. He has no chance.
- BlueMax372, on 02/02/2008, -0/+2The politically-befuddled lying crackpot socialist rectal pore is already the quintessential Manchurian candidate. Thank you, sir, for your service to our country. Now, check yourself into the psychiatric ward, shut up, and retire.
- exgop, on 02/02/2008, -0/+1sorry cant go third party, the two party system as messed up as it is, governs better than a multi party government.
- DanThePainter, on 02/01/2008, -1/+2Little harsh, eh? C'mon; I've got leftist friends. They are wrong, in my opinion. But they don't deserve that fate.
- Observant1, on 02/01/2008, -0/+1ya had me till ya said romney.. old RP better than both of them, public speaking and charisma are not his strong points BUT, he does know what he's talking about.
- inactive, on 02/02/2008, -1/+2You never learn.
- Observant1, on 02/01/2008, -1/+2its why to look at the real republican with libertarian/constitutionalist leanings, you know, the one mainstream media tries so hard to keep a lid on for some reason....
- jamesotis, on 02/01/2008, -3/+3It's becoming apparent that Obama is something far worse than merely indifferent to Islamism -- he's sympathetic to it.
- JKap, on 02/01/2008, -2/+2Two sides of the same coin, two management teams bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated. The Truth is out there in front of you, but they lay out this buffet of lies...I'm sick of it and I'm not gonna take a bite out of it, do you got me!?!?
Ron Paul for President 2008. There's still Hope for America, it's almost too late. - exgop, on 02/03/2008, -1/+1I really dont care anymore America is *****
- vault, on 02/02/2008, -1/+1The 19th century welcomes you, card.
- insane11, on 02/01/2008, -3/+3No, Rudy = owned by Rudy. He made a mistake skipping the early states and focusing on Florida and paid for it. If he campaigned in the early states I'm sure he would have beat Ron Paul, so stop thinking you guys are amazing for staying in the race longer than Rudy. I'm far from a Giuliani fan but at least he knows when he's lost, unlike you guys.
- inactive, on 02/01/2008, -4/+3Paul = Owned .... by everyone else.
- Observant1, on 02/01/2008, -2/+1immediately after WW2 the US had operation paperclip to bring nazi war criminals to the US with full pardon: rocket scientists to gve us NASA, propaganda artists to steer government and public opinion of it, security specialists to form the CIA that Bush senior was part of since its inception. the nazi party has fully infiltrated republicans and democrats, they are all nazi's who just pass the baton (and blame) back and forth for a show to the public, as the true nazi agenda continues to roll forward. this isnt a joke: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/es ... look at what the bush family really is.
- Observant1, on 02/01/2008, -2/+1bush = nazi, along with a majority of DC : http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/es ...
- card51short, on 02/01/2008, -5/+3LOL
Rudy = Owned...by Paul - TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -7/+3I support McCain and I supported Rudy. I am a Republican yet I am not a conservative, To me the main issue in this election is the Global War on Terrorism. McCain has stated many times as well has Rudy that the GWOT is the main issue and national security is of the upmost importance. Like it has been said already no candidate is perfect and McCain or Rudy are no exceptions. IMO with McCain putting the war against islamic terrorism on the highest priority shows to me that he is the best suited to be president over Rommney. The dems obama/hitlerry will not even admit we are in a war against islamic terrorists and want to just end the war at any cost. They must be defeated because of this not to mention the dems wanting to tax us all to hell and ruin this country. If you "claim" you are a conservative and are willing to vote for a dem just because you do not like McCain shows that you are not even a Republican let alone a conservative.
It seems like the main part of "being a conservative" is being religious over anything else. I know conservatives hate hearing this but there are Republicans that could care less about religion and still have good morals and live good lives. Being a holy roller like Huckabee, GWB, and Rommney are not requirements to be in the republican party. Maybe you got to be one to be a conservative though. This infighting by the conservatives with the republicans is pointless and just going to harm us in the end. - Gabberwok, on 02/01/2008, -12/+2You say that like it's a bad thing...
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is