What is Digg?4 Comments
- oOLiquidNightOo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4i think the guy's just hoping natalie portman will show up at his door.
- blotzort, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0This article is another excellent "connect the dots" piece by the author. I don't know why on earth so many people blindly accept the administration's propaganda yet criticize well reasoned and logical articles such as this one. All one needs to do is look at the known facts and continually ask him or herself, "who benefits?" to determine what passes muster and what fails the BS meter.
It's a FACT a lot of people have died in this conflict! We can argue until the cows come home about the exact numbers but it doesn't change this fact. It's a FACT the insurgency hasn't exclusively targeted coalition forces! Have you ever asked yourself why? It's a FACT our intelligence agencies use any means necessary to produce division and strife in targeted countries. This has been documented for decades!
If there are wild conspiracies contained in the article, I sure don't see them! Read it for yourself and decide. - lokipapalegba, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1I think the writer is on to something. A real insurgency would target the invading force, the U.S. occupation. It makes no sense for those fighting against the Americans to kill their own citizens with indiscriminate suicide bombings in civilian areas. Not only does it not target the real enemy (the invaders), but it turns their most valuable supporters (the Iraqi people) against them. Which is precisely what those (read CIA/Mossad) who are really behind the contrived "sectarian violence" want. The responsibility for the entire massive death toll in Iraq lays squarely on the shoulders of the U.S. and British governments. Whether from the direct killing by American shoulders, or indirectly by the CIA controlled Iraqi interior ministry death squads.
- spottrack7, on 10/12/2007, -4/+22 years ago neocon-minded people thought it was silly to think about 100,000 deaths. And now, with this 6x figure at hand? Considering this, it could be also that the US military casualties are... faked by a factor of 6!? No? Only 3x more perhaps?
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is