What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Check out new footage. view!
DragonAge.BioWare.com - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
191 Comments
- kwazyhulk, on 03/31/2008, -0/+67I can't wait for the Clinton camp to tell us that Super ("Automatic") delegates don't matter either...
- zephyear, on 03/31/2008, -0/+53no wait guys, superdelegates don't matter
oh wait you mean those are the things i was basing my entire campaign around?
oh well, i misspoke - Stonecipher26, on 03/31/2008, -1/+52Hopefully all those undeclared, but not undecided SDs come out before April 22. A win in PA for Obama would end this thing once and for all.
- scottc, on 03/31/2008, -0/+47She sees the writing on the wall with the superdelegates. That's why last week she started telling pledged delegates - the ones people voted for to represent their choice at the national convention - that they were free to break their pledge and vote for her. While there are legitimate arguments either way regarding the supers, asking the pledged delegates to change their vote is an attempt to steal the election, IMO.
- ziptnf, on 03/31/2008, -3/+29Clinton is way ahead of Obama in PA, and it doesn't look like he'll be able to make up the difference in that state. Despite the calls for her to quit, Clinton won't quit till the convention, because she's a delusional bitch. Obama will still be our nominee, but it's going to go down to the wire.
- rolfv, on 03/31/2008, -0/+22All you people want is MORE MORE MORE, LEAVE HILLARY ALONE D': (seriously, plz don't give her any more delegates)
- kynn, on 03/31/2008, -1/+19Setbacks continue to pile up for Hillary: losing Texas after all her premature hoopla, superdelegates and other high-profile endorsements going to her opponent, her finances in disarray, her amply padded résumé becoming the laughingstock of this election, but she marches on, oblivious to all this... In her refusal to accept reality, Clinton is showing herself to be George Bush's pant-suited twin. The country is tired of politicians that confuse tenacity with stubbornness and stupidity, and I expect that she will continue to get hammered in opinion polls over the next weeks...
- theaceoffire, on 03/31/2008, -1/+18If my middle name was "terrorist", people like you would have shot me. Doesn't matter if I fed the poor and saved your kids from a fire, "OMG WTF TERRORIST" and that would have been it.
Didn't making fun of people's name die out in kindergarten? - IPublius, on 03/31/2008, -0/+17Am I the only one who sees that Clinton is calling for every (normal) vote to count unless she doesn't have the lead in pledged delegates and popular vote, in which case she wants the super-delegates to "do the job they were created for" and overturn the democratic vote of the people and give her the nomination.
She claims that she does not want the voters in Florida and Michigan to be disenfranchised, but then calls for the super-delegates to disenfranchise the voters in all 50 states by overturning the electorate with party insider votes. - DiggLive, on 03/31/2008, -0/+16This ***** is getting so exciting! The agonizing wait until her tax returns, supers going for Obama because of that and the Bosnia "sniper fire", the pending fall out from supers based on April 15th and 22nd. *****, if this thing isn't settled in the last week of April, it sure will be in the second week of May.
- InfamousAtheist, on 03/31/2008, -0/+15The SC shouldn't touch it - it's a party matter governed by party rules, unlike the general election.
- brstilson, on 03/31/2008, -0/+15If Obama wasn't running I think the race would either be between Edwards and Clinton or Clinton will have secured the nomination and we'd all be complaining that we picked another John Kerry this year.
- thefirstenemy, on 03/31/2008, -10/+25Obama won't win PA. Don't set Obama up for a larger failure by setting his expectations of winning at anything more than a win being as close as possible to Clinton in the delegate count.
- AntoniusMaximus, on 03/31/2008, -2/+15True Americans with flag pins and hands over their chests like the ones who put you in this quagmire? I say bin the prejudice and give the man a chance.
- mugsoh, on 03/31/2008, -0/+12Representatives TO the state legislature are not super delegates. But, this article clearly says representatives FROM North Carolina (to Congress) and they most certainly ARE super delegates.Any democrat elected to national office is a super delegate.
- DharmaDog, on 03/31/2008, -1/+13What does not wearing a flag pin have to do with anything? It's not a show of patriotism any more than having a stupid "support the troops" yellow ribbon magnet on your car does anything to actually support the troops. It's a way to pander to those you strike fear in with your propaganda. Obama isn't about fear; he's about hope and change. A real patriot doesn't need a flag pin. A real patriot doesn't blindly follow the government, but instead measures the government against the constitution. My allegiance is to that document, no to whatever Skull and Bones lackey's turn it is be President. You do understand that it's possible to dislike the government and still love the country, don't you? I don't need a flag on my lapel or a flag on my car to be a patriot. What you seem to be advocating is strict nationalism. It's not the same thing as patriotism. Please stop confusing the two.
- vinyl18, on 03/31/2008, -1/+12....you're kidding me right? Seeing as how Obama will win the same northeast states Hillary will win and he opens up a few southern and midwestern states. Never mind the fact he has the youth vote at record numbers and the african american vote as well as the latino vote which will jump to his side when he gets the nomination. All that's needed is the uneducated white person vote.
- ziptnf, on 03/31/2008, -3/+14Automatically assume that anyone who has ever experimented with drugs deals them, someone who was born from a muslim father is still muslim, and every word out of his pastors mouth was racist. That wouldn't be very characteristic of a dumbass republican.
- klco, on 03/31/2008, -1/+11Just like Bush 'saved' certain Americans from having the terrible burden of having to follow the law...
- ProfessorSYM, on 03/31/2008, -2/+12She will take this thing to the Supreme Court!
- sponeil, on 03/31/2008, -1/+11What a load of crap. Several polls have shown that Obama stands a much better chance of winning against McCain than Hillary does. Polls are easy to fake, but when every poll you read about points the same way, it is not entirely unbelievable. Personally, I know a lot of Democrats who will either vote for McCain or not vote at all if Hillary gets the nomination. Not only do I not hear people saying the same about Obama, but I hear quite a few Republicans saying they will vote for Obama if he gets the nomination.
Every argument you made against Obama is also crap. It's all either words taken out of context (his pastor's comments), something that makes no sense (you're not supposed to place your hand over your heart during the national anthem), or something that's just plain wrong (anyone who has been proud of what America's been doing since WWII is either immoral or stupid). If American ideals are that it's a good thing to use our military might to exploit other countries, then I either want a change or I want out. - wild, on 03/31/2008, -0/+10You know that using "Huessein" invalidates anything you say, right? It pegs you instantly as someone who has little interest in real issues and likes to play the "lets just slander" game. I for one am tired of it. And the more you guys come out of the woodwork, the stronger my conviction gets to back Obama.
- inactive, on 03/31/2008, -0/+9Her campaign must be suffering due to the constant sniper fire she is forced to hide from...
- bongowaxx, on 03/31/2008, -0/+8http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results ...
That has the delegate count as Obama 99 to Hillary's 95. Which makes Obama the winner in delegates. Hillary won the primary, but Obama won the caucus... Since these elections are nothing more than a race for delegates... You can count Obama as the winner. Also... if you count TOTAL votes Obama won the "popular" vote in Texas (problem with that argument is, in Texas.. .you can vote in both elections, so that argument is flawed.) - inactive, on 03/31/2008, -2/+10Yes, I do. And for most of those Digg-based supporters who are familiar with your anti-Obama rants, "Shut up" seems to about cover it. I mean how much more flowery would you like it?
- mrjah, on 03/31/2008, -1/+9rrc7cz: If you can't see a huge and obvious difference between the way Obama and Hillary are running their respective campaigns and representing themselves, then for your own sake I hope you're blind and deaf and can't read Braille.
- Toupee, on 03/31/2008, -0/+8I don't know... 20,000 people attended his rally here at Penn State's main campus yesterday. It was the talk of the town without a doubt and just before that he was bowling in Altoona. It's true that there are a lot of Hillary signs outside of the bigger towns though...
- ziptnf, on 03/31/2008, -4/+12Shut up.
- WasabiBomb, on 03/31/2008, -2/+10... and sometimes, being dugg down is just an indication that you're a right wing troll.
- klco, on 03/31/2008, -2/+10Wildly successful tax cuts!?! I am going to have to call BS on that...
- digg50, on 03/31/2008, -0/+8I read an article that one state delagate for Clinton after finding out in the press thanks to clinton that he wasnt required to vote for the person he was elected to decided to vote for Obama. I will try and find the article to link.
- Kurlumbenus, on 03/31/2008, -0/+8If Obama wasn't running I'd be voting for McCain. ***** blindly voting along party lines.
- sharpfork, on 03/31/2008, -0/+7To say something would be perceived as "unconstitutional " when it has absolutely nothing to do with the constitution shows you obviously do not understand the process you are commenting on. The process is defined by the Democratic party, not the founding fathers. Lt me rewrite your last sentence to fit reality:
Since this process is following the rules setup by the DNC and a majority of Democrats do not want Hillary as the nominee, no one is really making an issue out of it. - digg50, on 03/31/2008, -1/+8Obama won texas. check any of the recent news from the last 2 days.
- orangefly, on 03/31/2008, -0/+7seriously....???....a republican talking about taking freedom from americans.....???....
- chrissku, on 03/31/2008, -0/+7The Super Delegates are starting to move to Obama in bigger and bigger numbers. It's gonna take a large number of the uncommitted delegates to move to Obama before Clinton is going to drop out. She seems to think she has a reasonable shot of winning. I would have to disagree.
- dafragsta, on 03/31/2008, -1/+7Is your point that it's sexist? I beg to differ. If "she" were a "he," "he'd" be an an "*****." Don't make complaints of sexism, sister. There are a lot more douchebag, dickweed, dickwad, assclown, asshat, assmaster, *****, *****, bastard, son-of-a-bitch, (but no daughter-of-a-bastard?), *****, cockmaster, cockknocker, *****, and *****-for-brains labels which are rarely applied when it's known that the subject of discussion is a woman. Granted, we can always ball the nastiness of all those words up into one and call a woman a ***** and unleash the fury.
/whooooooaaa... I didn't say it! ;) - Shadic, on 03/31/2008, -0/+6"his failure to place his hand over his heart during America's national anthem" Yeah, he was too busy SINGING, you dolt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4FD-j_Dqq8 - digg50, on 03/31/2008, -0/+6found the link
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/03/clinton ... - inactive, on 03/31/2008, -1/+7Wearing a flag pin is what *some* non-Patriots do to avoid having their patriotism called into question by idiots who have stopped thinking.
- ziptnf, on 03/31/2008, -1/+7Only if you're too young/naive to get offended by that kind of thing.
- ThugThrasher, on 03/31/2008, -0/+6Well, it'd be different if he had ALSO said John Sidney McCain because then he would have been consistent. But it's obvious that when someone mentions more than one candidate and the ONLY middle name they mention is Hussein, then the entire point of mentioning it is to try and associate Obama with someone ELSE named Hussein.
- zephyear, on 03/31/2008, -0/+5of course you'd love to think that, based on all your (stupid) comments
- Kurlumbenus, on 03/31/2008, -3/+8Because pessimism is boring.
- SteveIsTheDude, on 03/31/2008, -0/+5No, Obama will. Sorry.
- wild, on 03/31/2008, -3/+8The man makes sense. I don't understand why you guys are digging him down.
- WasabiBomb, on 03/31/2008, -0/+5Nope, sorry. But hey, if denial is what gets you through the day, have fun.
- apetrie, on 03/31/2008, -2/+7Yes, you two are martyrs. /sarcasm
- inigomntoya, on 03/31/2008, -0/+5HAHA - nice one! BURNED!!
- Pherdnut, on 03/31/2008, -0/+5You know, it's weird, we've been trying to do this with the underrepresentation of clues among our GOP brothers and sisters for years now but it just won't take. Perhaps if we give all our extra clues to the smartest people they'll trickle down to the idiots.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 193 discussions
Catch all of your favorite Digg shows in one place, including Digg Dialogg, Diggnation, The Digg Reel and More!
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is