5 Comments
- inactive, on 08/20/2008, -0/+6Dugg for: #Number of Tattoos and Size of Television as Deciding Demographics.
- duckley, on 08/20/2008, -0/+2“McCain, by continuing the basic thrust of Bush’s tax policies and adding a few new wrinkles, would cut taxes for the top 0.1 percent of earners — those making an average of $9.1 million — by ANOTHER $190,000 a year, ON TOP OF the Bush reductions.”
- alienSkull, on 08/22/2008, -0/+1dugg for facebook-masturbators
- kevinb70, on 08/21/2008, -0/+0but I'm with you on this TV thing.. maybe a cross section of population who both 1) own large screen plasma TVs and 2) are "low income" who are "worried" about the "bad economy"... being that plasma's are flying out the door of best buys, circuit citys, and walmarts by all walks of life.
- kevinb70, on 08/21/2008, -0/+0Duckley trying to get your take on this. Since this 'article' is a parody, is your comment a parody as well? Are you seriously so angry and envious at those making more than (you) $9.1M, who probably pay more taxes in one year than you will earn over an entire lifetime, that $190K off their $2-3M a year tax bill is such an issue for you?
Top earners pay >~ $2,000,000 in federal income taxes a year
You pay how much in income taxes a year?
You're really ok with this miniscule $190k tax break, right? You are aware of the benefit putting $190k in the hands of employers means, right? Trickles down into these people hiring more people and giving raises.



What is Digg?