What is Digg?137 Comments
- mickman17, on 11/28/2007, -7/+107Here is a politician that is for the people. He is not letting himself be bullied by the two parties to shut up and play the game - he is exposing them for what they are.
Kudos to Kucinich. If only America could see this man as the patriot he truly is and see the rest of the bunch for what they aren't - brownrabbit, on 11/28/2007, -9/+79Write your Congress People and request that they support the proposal and political action to impeach the President and Vice President.
- tehbored, on 11/28/2007, -6/+71Kucinich is easily the best candidate out there, on either party. He would make an excellent president. He supports freedom and peace. Elect Kucinich in 2008!
- shabumike, on 11/28/2007, -4/+41"Kucinich believes that the administration is creating a situation that will lead to a war with Iran." - It's not a secret, or a belief, it's fact.
- headt0thebunker, on 11/28/2007, -8/+37And call them and take a car load of your friends on a "save our country" trip to their offices.....speak to them in person....let them see you are serious.....and tell them if they fail you support this you will vote "against" them in the next election regardless of who is running....You will vote "against" them...
- jon30041, on 11/28/2007, -7/+34They're friends, and they both love the Constitution. Their opposites start and end, I think, with economics. Thanks to that, Kucinich is my man, but Ron Paul is second.
- BluesFan, on 11/28/2007, -6/+30Impeach Bush and cheney Now don't wait, IMPEACH NOW!
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 11/28/2007, -26/+50kucinich > ron paul.
No, you can't agree with both because they are polar opposites. If you like them both just because they want out of the war, then just vote for Obama then. - Murphy52589, on 11/28/2007, -4/+22Kucinich FTW!
- 3tcp, on 11/28/2007, -1/+16It's worth noting that hillary clinton is the presidential candidate that has taken the most aggressive stance on iran.
- jon30041, on 11/28/2007, -3/+17Remember, though: voice-mails don't get listened to, e-mails don't get read. To actually get a message to someone, you have to send it snail, handwritten as well.
That way, they have to read through it to decide whether to discard it or not, rather than just click a delete button. - Mageling, on 11/28/2007, -0/+12I'm not going to digg you down because I know where you're coming from but impeachment was made to be used. If you don't think we're being lead blind into a war we don't need or want then you need open your eyes.. Our troops are deserting, dying and questioning command already and if we go into another useless war there won't be much of an army left. (draft, anyone?)
Face it. Our current leadership is not in the best interest of the country and we must use the only tool available to change that. (Because, you know.. declaring war was the first tool to stop this behavior and the president and vice president ***** all over the congress with that.
OUR PRESIDENT HAS VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION. WHY THE HELL ARE WE STILL DEFENDING HIM? - Jo9100, on 11/28/2007, -7/+18add kucinich to your digg friends! http://digg.com/elections/
- mabhatter, on 11/28/2007, -1/+12Ironically they are so far apart they share the same fans though! After all True Republicans want the govt's hands off everything to the execption that the govt will enforce economically unfair contracts, but not set rule for terms to keep the field fair. True Democrats want the govt to be actively involved in rule setting to keep the economics fair for the little guy in spite of contractual terms unfairly entered into.
What the "moderates" in charge fail to see is that in the current situation the govt is enforcing unfair contracts and working actively to make them MORE unfair... that squeezes out the little people the big companies shake down for money and soon there won't be any. Reality is that we need BOTH opinions of Kucinich and Paul in a sort of ying-yang balance, each of them is closer to the "truth" than the current people in charge. - GafferXL, on 11/28/2007, -3/+14Postulations aren't grounds for impeachment.
Cheney's conduct, however, is. - badqat, on 11/28/2007, -1/+11You're part of the problem. As someone has already stated, they are friends and have a lot of respect for each other.
Despite you wanting something, that doesn't mean you're going to get it. Sometimes, compromise is the only solution. But you, like the democrats and republicans in congress, are so obsessed with hunkering down under some supposed moral superiority, that nothing gets done.
Great job! - Carv, on 11/28/2007, -2/+12"$10 million for retrofitting B2 stealth bombers that could drop bunker-buster bombs" - So sad what this world has come to.
We need Kucinich '08. - DigitalDisease, on 11/28/2007, -2/+12Starting a war of aggression is an international crime.
http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-nurem.htm
Principle Vl
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under; international law:
1. Crimes against peace:
1. Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
2. Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
2. War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave-labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or illtreatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
3. Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime. - stillasleep00, on 11/28/2007, -0/+10I don't necessarily agree with his economical views, but it sure is nice to see a politician with a sense of integrity.
Go Kucinich! - tHePeOPle, on 11/28/2007, -2/+11***** you. This matters more than anything else. If not for the present, then surely for the future of this country.
- AshamedAmerican, on 11/28/2007, -8/+17Maybe they should just skip the impeachments and just go right to the gallows.
- relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -2/+11I don't care to listen to those who say Kucinich supporters and Paul supporters can't be one and the same -- Regardless of their differences in regard to government growth and economics, they are both the two strongest candidates by far who do not let the issues clout their integrity and their honesty. I think they could both find common ground and work together very well if they shared a ticket, and would be in a better position to unite the country than anybody else.
I support them both for their veracity and their candour. Let that come first in a politician, and the issues will find a solution. - GhostyBoy, on 11/28/2007, -0/+8I "woke up" about a dozen of my friends in one day.
This is an excuse not to try.
I'd rather go down fighting. - XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 11/28/2007, -6/+14No, they cannot possibly find any common ground. Ron Paul wants absolute laissez-faire economics, Kucinich wants a mixed economy. Ron Paul wants the economy to take its place and advocates "small government" and privatization. Kucinich wants to nationalize healthcare and improve social security benefits.
This is reminiscent of the bout between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. - janne1, on 11/28/2007, -2/+10No no, maniacs who voted for these insane leaders don't get to take the moral high ground.
- GhostyBoy, on 11/28/2007, -0/+7Obama's not going to get us out of the war. I like him, and he might even try, but we need someone who will never bow to political pressure.
Kuccinich and Paul demonstrate that. And yes, I like them both. - thcobbs, on 11/28/2007, -0/+6No they aren't you dumbass. They are hardened CONVENTIONAL warheads on laser-guided missiles that can penetrate several layers of concrete.
- inactive, on 11/28/2007, -3/+9Retro fit my ass lets use our fleet of minutemen dammit!!!!
- pintomp3, on 11/28/2007, -1/+7seeking justice is never a waste of time.
- pintomp3, on 11/28/2007, -0/+6yeah, seeking justice for violating the constitution, spying on americans, and starting wars is such a waste of time.
- Dylson, on 11/28/2007, -2/+8Good.
- Sparser, on 11/28/2007, -1/+6Leftards? Gimme a break.
- jbird71, on 11/28/2007, -0/+5You can also bet that she would pardon Bush and Cheney if needed.
- LeeSoong, on 11/28/2007, -0/+5People in Pakistan and India should write U.S. senators too - because if the USA bombs nuclear facilities in Iran, the fallout will blow over into Pakistan and even into India.
If the US is going to ''neutralize'' Iranian Nuclear Facilities - they Marines ground forces should capture the buildings, blowing up a bunch of concentrated radioactive fuel is a very messy, and long term problem. - desertDenizen, on 11/28/2007, -1/+6I sent an email to my Representative (Harry Mitchell) on this issue and received a personalized response that addressed my specific points. At least I know it got read, even if by a staffer. (I've found that Representatives have fewer inquiries to respond to and more bandwidth for such things than Senators.)
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 11/28/2007, -2/+7except RP's and kucinich's ideologies are polar opposites.
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 11/28/2007, -7/+11No, they are opposed in every way possible except for the Constitution- which every politician should love anyway.
- Malarie, on 11/28/2007, -9/+13Sorry, too many americans are too busy watching Entertainment Tonight and reading the lastest gossip on Britney Spears. Nothing will change.
- RyanM, on 11/28/2007, -9/+13get 100,000 people to commit to donate $100 each to Dennis Kucinich on December 15, 2007, for a total one-day contribution of $10 million
http://www.december152007.com/ - badqat, on 11/28/2007, -2/+6And it's also worth noting that she's convinced it's her destiny to be not only the democrat nominee, but the president as well.
I sure hope democrats are smarter than that... - bugsy187, on 11/28/2007, -2/+6You might want to focus more on what's happening to the country right now.
- theiggy, on 11/28/2007, -0/+3I scored a 44 with kucinich and a 19 with paul, but I still support a paul presidency more. That list asks nothing about financial policy. I also dont need to agree with a candidate on every issue, they're both men of integrity.
- Proletariat, on 11/28/2007, -0/+3mirror?
- pintomp3, on 11/28/2007, -0/+3why do you support ron paul? because he defends the constitution? well, he voted against investigating impeachment of those who violated it.
- georgemason01, on 11/28/2007, -0/+3"congress people" does not deserve to be capitalized. Nor does president and vice president for that matter.
- proliance, on 11/28/2007, -1/+4http://science.howstuffworks.com/bunker-buster.htm
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best. - laughmore, on 11/28/2007, -1/+4IMPEACH THEM (Cheney, Bush) NOW!!! (Actually there's probably more cause for TREASON procedures NOW!, google 'PDB August 6, 2001' )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6KbUpGNBts - PhireN, on 11/28/2007, -5/+7Wait, isn't the bunker buster a low yield nuke?
- bmunichman, on 11/28/2007, -0/+2Depleted uranium is so useful because its extremely dense, not necessarily because of hardness. Its also pyrophoric, so when it penetrates armour it creates a shower of burning particles that kill anyone inside the vehicle
- obelisky, on 11/28/2007, -0/+2sends a great message to future would be corrupt leaders that hey, its ok...
-
Show 51 - 100 of 135 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is