What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Check out new footage. view!
DragonAge.BioWare.com - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
190 Comments
- Taquoshi, on 06/11/2008, -7/+64It would be so simple to resolve this...just by releasing his birth certificate. Failing that, his passport would do.
- djmdjm, on 06/11/2008, -21/+73Wow, wouldn't that be a typical Democrat lawless stunt. Run a candidate that does not meet plain constitutional guidelines. Oh I forgot, even if it where true the Dems are above the Constitution, (their motives being ever so pure.)
- klesb, on 06/11/2008, -9/+53No one is above the law. (Judicial Watch)
- IllegalsGoHome, on 06/11/2008, -20/+62This anti-American, anti-God of the Bible, racist Marxist should be scrutinized just like McCain and even more so since his birth circumstances are highly questionable. Frankly, I would celebrate if this closet Muslim were disqualified. He doesn't fool me one iota!
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -16/+58If Obama comes under more scrutiny and there are threats of disqualification, he'll then pull the race card, causing his detractors to cower and scurry away.
- VinBea, on 06/11/2008, -11/+46Everything about Hussein Obama is wrong for America, from the way he's been brought up out of virtually obscurity in the senate - packaged - and is now being sold to America as the best thing since sliced bread was created!
America is ripe to be plucked - harvested - for all the evils being advanced within its borders (not to mention nation building globally via our military advancing UN back policies) by the progressives making up both main political parties in the United States; and I can not think of a better example of America's total deprivation and inability to discern right from wrong, than to have B. ""Hussein"" Obama grabbing hold of the 'supposed' reigns of power in becoming president via 'bogus' elections using electronic voting machines without a paper-trail; and this irregardless of his national-origin.
If we were the Christian nation of even fifty years ago - neither Obama or McCain would be electable for obvious reasons... - Kaffir, on 06/11/2008, -12/+43Two of my sons were born overseas, and therefore are ineligible to become President of the United States of America. Even though both of us parents are American citizens (we were missionaries for some 9 years) and my oldest son has served for 4 years and is now serving with the U.S. Marine Corps in Iraq, he cannot even dream of reaching for such a position! Yet here is Obama, with only one parent a U.S. citizen, no birth certificate to certify his eligibility, is running a campaign for the highest position upon the planet! Where are the news magazines, reporters and commentators asking for his birth certificate, proof certain of his meeting Constitutional laws? McCain's situation has been put under a magnifying glass, and he has provided all the information demanded of him. He's been vetted and proven in this matter to be eligible! The same must be DEMANDED of Obama! The U.S. Constitution must be upheld . . . otherwise, how can Obama possibly mean what he says if he were to take the "Oath of Office"?
- jfm777, on 06/11/2008, -10/+41 Since when do we take someone's word that they were born a US citizen as fact? If he IS eligible to run,he DOES need to prove he is eligible. There's a lot of folks who want to run for president that cannot, because they are not naturalized US citizens, so who is Mr. smiley here to say he is above it, especially after John McCain just had to prove HE was a legit American born candidate by law????
If John McCain was black, he could have just said "screw the law you racists.. ", right?
Almost every time someone REFUSES to show they are legally whatever, you can bet they are not..
Illegal aliens could just start calling the cops racists for asking for proof of US citizenship, right?
(how could someone with a name that sounds just like "IRAQ [saddam] HUSSEIN OSSAMA" ever get this far after 9-11 to begin with????)
Another day... another brick taken out of our country's wall of sanity! - inactive, on 06/11/2008, -0/+29Threats of violence just because you don't like what a person has to say? There are laws on the books for that. And reported by the way.
- lookingforHim, on 06/11/2008, -2/+30You are correct. But it makes one wonder why they have not done so.
Are they trying to hide something else? Like his FULL name? What other information could they be not wanting to share? - Barbrady, on 06/11/2008, -3/+29You Obama nutswingers sure are clueless.
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -7/+33I don't see any evidence that Obama is a legal citizen. Let's see the birth certificate and see it now. Otherwise, he's just Obama the Illegal!
- arkansasindian1, on 06/11/2008, -5/+30The Constitution-- Amendment XIV,section 1)Citizenship......"All persons born or naturalized in the United States,And subject to the jurisdiction thereof,are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside".now if you really want to get a discussion going,look up what "And subject to the jurisdiction thereof", means.It can get very interesting!
- 14justice, on 06/11/2008, -5/+30It shouldn't be difficult for an enterprising investigator to obtain a copy of Barack Obama's birth certificate. Of course it wouldn't have his Social Security number on it, you get your Social Security number afterward. It isn't copyrighted either, it's a public record. Get it and post it on the internet.
Enterprising investigator, where are you? - inactive, on 06/11/2008, -3/+27Why does Obama hide his birth certificate?
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -0/+24Elwizardo tends to stalk me on digg. Not an inside joke. Not funny at all, either.
- exgop, on 06/11/2008, -8/+32If their is nothing to this, the O-Blah blah campaign needs to simply show his birth certificate. This will answer every question. The more they hesitate in showing his birth certificate the more the American people will suspect the accusation is true.
- DrReaper, on 06/11/2008, -1/+24It is fishy. Remember when they libs were insulting Bush's intelligence only to find out later he had better grades then Kerry. That was a laugh.
- LadyAmerica, on 06/11/2008, -0/+23rjwusa, did elwizardo just made a terrorist threat against you? Or was it an inside joke?
- these3remain, on 06/11/2008, -0/+22He's an obnoxious, mentally unhinged troll. Report it, I did , because even if your a lefty, there is no justification for that type of comment. It should not be tolerated.
- these3remain, on 06/11/2008, -1/+22Ditto.
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -6/+25I can't understand why Obama has yet to provide his birth certificate. Did Hillary slip up? She's usually adept at this kind of thing
- watnext, on 06/11/2008, -5/+23Obama the boob! Not much experience in just about anything, not able to talk without a teleprompter and a written speech and now not even a legitimate candiditate. Time for the damnocrats to wake up and read some history of former Democrats years ago when they were not socialistically ruining our country. I think there were a few but am not certain of that.
- DrReaper, on 06/11/2008, -17/+35When did the constitution even count? Our money isn't back by anything but bombs. The supreme law of the land the constitution says in black and hemp. Gold and Silver should be the only money.
- VinBea, on 06/11/2008, -2/+20Kaffir, I wish it were all about meaning what one says over and against what is said verses what's actually done - irregardless of what the topic is.
Fact - everything going on out of WDC today is illegal, and is the worse kind of illegal activity in that those who are guilty will not be held accountable anymore than Bill or Hillary Clinton are being held accountable for the crimes they're guilty of...
If those who control the GW Bushes of our nation, or control the Bill and Hillary Clintons of our nation et al, want to select Hussein to represent America there's not thing one you or I can do about it...
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan52.htm
The worse thing Americans can do now is bury their head in the dirt wishing it'd all just go away! - inactive, on 06/11/2008, -7/+24What's all the hub-bub? There isn't a politician in this country that holds the Constitution as the document of authority for anything EXCEPT those things they WANT. And it's been that way for years.
My own Senator (I hate to Say his name) Larry Craig, has told me the Constitution is viewed as a "dynamic" document. In other words, it means what ever they want it to mean.
Granted, L. Craig would be the last person I'd believe as the final word on anything except bathroom protocol, but it's the way THEY view it that matters. Since citizens can't keep them on point all the time even if they would listen to us.
The Constitution is now used as a lever to be applied against citizens only and only at the discretion of THEM.
The power of: We the People, has been turned completely around. It's now viewed as their club. Not a CONTRACT between We the People and government. (Which by the way, I believe has been broken, and is now null and void).
Citizens need to pull their heads out of their collective asses and either hold guys accountable or revolt. - sweetnsour, on 06/11/2008, -17/+34This man is bought and paid for by the British via an Iraqi millionaire crook. He is a danger to the US and must be removed from the race.
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -0/+17Elwizardo's account has already been terminated, and his death threat comment removed. That was a lot faster than I thought.
- DavidS9, on 06/11/2008, -1/+18Wait you mean you won't take his word for it?? Gee then all those liberals that spout off about the GOP would have to start providing proof as well and we all know that won't happen.
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -8/+25There is another aspect of Obama’s citizenship in question that NO ONE is reporting on. I wonder why?
On November 23, 1993, President Clinton signed United States Public Law 103-150, which not only acknowledged the illegal actions committed by the United States in the overthrow of the legitimate government of Hawaii, but also that the Hawaiian people never surrendered their sovereignty.
The latter is the most important part of United States Public Law 103-150 for it makes it quite clear that the Hawaiian people never legally ceased to be a sovereign separate independent nation. There is no argument that can change that fact.
United States Public Law 103-150, despite its polite language, is an official admission that the government of the United States illegally occupies the territory of the Hawaiian people.
In 1999, the United Nations confirmed that the plebiscite vote that led to Hawaii's statehood was in violation of article 73 of the United Nations' charter. The Hawaii statehood vote, under treaty then in effect, was illegal and non-binding.
Hawaii Declares Independence From All Foreign Powers Samuel Keolamauloa Kaluna, Jr. Regent, Prime Minister P.O. Box 359 96-3148 Pikake Street Pahala-Kau, Kingdom of Hawaii 96777
In 1999, the United Nations confirmed that the plebiscite vote that led to Hawaii's statehood was in violation of article 73 of the United Nations' charter. The Hawaii statehood vote, under treaty then in effect, was illegal and non-binding.
In a world where nations are as governed by laws as are men, Hawaii is not and has never legally been a part of the United States. Hawaii was stolen from the Hawaiian people, and they want it back.
Hawaiians submitted a petition to Congress with 29,000 signatures opposing annexation, and petitions to the Republic of Hawaii (the satellite government imposed upon the native Hawaiians), asking that annexation be put to a public vote. They were never permitted to vote on the issue.
In all, three separate Treaties of Annexation were sent to congress. All three failed. In the end, Hawaii was annexed by a joint resolution of Congress. But Congress did not have the legal authority to do so. A joint resolution of the U.S. Congress has no legal standing in a foreign country, which is what Hawaii remained, even under the provisional government.
If one holds that the government of the United States is obliged to obey the laws and the UN charter it freely signed, then the status of the Hawaiian people as a distinct and sovereign nation is beyond debate. This makes the United States in Hawaii, as Gandhi described the British in India, acting as the masters in someone else's home.
ARTICLE II, Section I. of the Constitution of the United States requires:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii and thus was not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States to satisfy the constitutional requirement for the U.S. Presidency. His mother was from Wichita, Kansas, but his father was born in Nyangoma-Ko-Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya. Legally then, Barack Obama is a foreigner, per United States Public Law 103-150. It is revealing that the American Communist party (CPUSA) actively supports Obama. In admitting his birth in Honolulu Barack Obama has, perhaps innocently, claimed to be a natural born Citizen, a false presentation nevertheless. An innocent violation of the U.S. Constitution in such an important matter as that of vying to be President is still a most serious transgression.
President Bush has sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States in his oath of office.
Will President Bush issue an executive order disqualifying Barack Obama as a Constitutional Candidate for President of the United States? Or who will sue the Federal election Board and the DNC over this abuse of the constitution? Will the RNC sue? Will the McCain campaign sue? Will President George Bush sue to have a decision from the Supreme Court? Will some group of concerned citizens sue? Or shall the fraud continue without action to correct it until the election? - MrsSpooky, on 06/11/2008, -2/+19That was addressed in the article and in a previous comment. Maybe you should actually read the article we're commenting on so you won't post messages on digg proving you didn't. :)
- lookingforHim, on 06/11/2008, -1/+18Different religions??? My history books read a little different.
America was founded by Christians being persecuted for practicing their Christian faith as they believed. NO State Church etc. - sbernie, on 06/11/2008, -4/+20You would be quite wrong on this issue. John McCain was born to two American citizens on a US naval base on territory controlled by the US government. I will agree with you on Obama, though, if he is born in the US even though his father was a foreign national, his mother is a citizen of the US and he was born on US soil. But John McCain is a natual born citizen also. I will vote for neither candidates becasue both are at the minimum socialist and Obama is a communist.
- DavidS9, on 06/11/2008, -4/+20The question I have is he a duel citizen with his fathers country? That splits his loyalties way more then any one should be comfortable with.
- DavidS9, on 06/11/2008, -0/+16It was probably one of the "nukes" she decided not to luanch.
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -0/+16He told Charlie Gibson he was running for leader of the free world. It is on youtube if you care to find it.
- 14justice, on 06/11/2008, -0/+15Interesting research, Navy. Of course, a law is not worth the paper it's written on if it's not enforced. Our masters in Washington, D.C., have a long history of enforcing laws that suit them, and otherwise not. I believe that the politicians of both parties are happy to let the fraud continue and that the courts will say that concerned citizens have no "standing" in such a case.
- flip2trip, on 06/12/2008, -0/+15Oh, that's why I couldn't find the death threat. So long Elwizardo you will not be missed.
- dlbfromLA, on 06/11/2008, -7/+21Hey ELRETARDO the truth hurts doesn't it!
- inactive, on 09/04/2008, -0/+14Since he was born in Hawaii, then he should be able to show his birth certificate to back up his word.
- drachemorder, on 06/11/2008, -1/+15"Elwizardo's account has already been terminated, and his death threat comment removed."
And there was much rejoicing!
* goes to listen to "Another One Bites the Dust" in commemoration of this event * - Taquoshi, on 06/11/2008, -1/+15I'm an amateur genealogist. I've got LOTS of practice in this kind of guessing game. Maybe Mama Obama didn't name daddy, or maybe it was a different father. Then there is the whole spectrum of where he was born. Or, maybe Obama is adopted and the records are sealed. Also, in the early days of adoption, one could, I am told by reliable anonymous sources, have the birth record amended depending on where you were and who you knew. That included the date and the race of the child. There are also legal ways of doing it, too, or so I have been told. Interesting, no???
- spinningplates2, on 06/11/2008, -7/+20Obama was elected by a landslide in Illinois for one reason. Republicans voted Democratic as a Protest against Dr. Alan Keys because he was from out of state. (last minute replacement for a GOP dropout) Think about that when you 3rd Party voters allow Obama to be elected in November.
- these3remain, on 06/11/2008, -1/+14"You morons" - as in morons who post comments without reading the article where the issue is already addressed?
- DavidS9, on 06/11/2008, -0/+12If you think Kerry (the back stabbing traitor) or Gore( the biggest con-man in history) Would have done a better job then Bush you are smoking something seriously mind altering.
- DrReaper, on 06/11/2008, -3/+14Sorry the Separation between church and state was a judicial fiat. The Supreme court removed God from the schools without ANY previous case law. That was the first time they passed a law without previous case law.
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -0/+10The article STATED that McCain is a U.S. citizen, because the Panama Canal zone was the property of the United States at the time; his parents were both U.S. citizens, and the birth occurred on a US military base.
READ THE ARTICLE! - gordonj, on 06/11/2008, -5/+15hahaha, because the british have been biding their time waiting to get america back for the boston tea party?
- inactive, on 06/11/2008, -0/+10Agreed.
As Patrick Henry stated: When the leaders of the government begin not to obey the Constitution and the will of the people, but begin making up there own laws to suite there needs with no regard for the will of the people, it is unfortunate in that the only thing that will preserve the Constitution, freedom and liberty will be the use of down right force. Not the exact quote - but you get the point.
I believe this is where we stand today. - soofan, on 06/11/2008, -1/+11you undoubtedly were educated by educators and not the History revised books of today. Great post and a correct one.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 205 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is