What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
Best Buy Employees Turn Carolers For A Day view!
www.youtube.com/bestbuy - Go behind the scenes to see real employees croon their way to star in Best Buy's holiday campaign.
19 Comments
- DoesItHurt, on 01/20/2008, -0/+14She used weighted percentages, her math is right. Check Romney: he took 10% of independent, but ind. are 14 % of the population, so she takes 10%*14% = 1.4% before adding.
Great analysis! - austinwpetersen, on 01/20/2008, -1/+12It's true! Notify the foreign press and all media that is not "owned" spread the word that the American Elections are being manipulated away. The Machiavellians have their Tyrannical state fully in place and their power is unchecked! US Constitution R.I.P. 1787-2008
- ronpublican, on 01/20/2008, -1/+10what makes u think they wont steal a few votes for the most feared candidate
- natschultz, on 01/20/2008, -1/+8Rep.% of voters = 84
Ind.% of voters = 16
Those added together (84 + 16) total 100% of voters.
You have to multiply the % of each vote cast by a Republican by the % of total Republican voters.
You then have to multiply the % of each vote cast by an Independent by the % of total Independent voters.
Adding the two results together gives you the % received of all votes cast for each candidate.
Just by looking at the original exit polls you can see that Paul was WAY ahead of McCain, since Paul was only 1 point behind McCain in the Republican votes cast (even though they were 84% of voters), yet Paul was 52 points ahead of McCain in the Independent votes cast (even though they were only 16% of voters).
McCain: Rep(.12*84)=10.08 Ind(.11*16) = 1.76 > 10.08+1.76 = 11.84% of total
Paul: Rep(.11*84)=9.24 Ind(.63*16) =10.08 > 9.24+10.08 = 19.32% of total
Romney: Rep(.53*84)=44.52 Ind(.10*16)=1.6 > 44.52+1.6= 46.12% of total
Anyway, the point is that the change from the original exit polls to the actual votes was beyond reason. Plus, all the votes that Paul lost were literally given to the other candidates.
It is a statistical improbability that every single other candidate would gain votes (even Duncan Hunter) and yet Ron Paul would lose so many of his from both Republicans and Independents.
Please, how can one county go take 16% of Paul’s votes away and disperse them among all the other candidates? The number of votes didn’t change, only the allocation of those votes changed in Washoe County.
Plus, there are horrible accounts coming out now that a lot of Paul supporters were not allowed to enter the caucus, but only to hand in their ballot and leave. That is NOT how caucuses work. And now there are accusations that Romney’s campaign had all their supporters spend the whole day phone-jamming Paul’s hotlines. Great, a former GOP operative who just got out of jail for doing just that just wrote a book all about that kind of stuff.
And changing exit polls hours after the fact because it is obvious that the vote tallies are way beyond the margin of error is totally not ok. The whole point of exit polls is to compare the results to how people say they voted. Anomalies like this are a bright red flag. - natschultz, on 01/21/2008, -0/+6MIRROR: http://www.nolanchart.com/authors/articles/article ...
Sorry, the blog host apparently does not like me exposing the truth.
I would have publishd this here first, but I couldn't get it to post last night. This link should work now! Thumb it up! - YoDiggity2, on 01/20/2008, -1/+7This is horrible! We have to email this to someone in the national media with some integrity, maybe Jack Cafferty or Keith Olberman, PBS folks - somebody! I'm emailing my local news stations too.
- dcronin90, on 01/20/2008, -2/+6RIP 1787-2000
- natschultz, on 01/20/2008, -0/+4Thanks!
- Lolo9, on 01/20/2008, -1/+4Vigilance is needed, thank you for yours natschultz!
- MadGangster, on 01/20/2008, -0/+3The exit polls were 'adjusted'? If this is true someone (MSNBC) has some explaining to do...
It reminds me of Iowa, when I refreshed the page (CNN) and saw Giuliani's vote count go down by 1,000 (And I still have no idea why). - Gilgamesh73, on 01/20/2008, -3/+5***** shill....
- Archer007, on 01/21/2008, -0/+2Mirror?
- inactive, on 01/31/2008, -0/+1Shill for what?
- natschultz, on 01/21/2008, -1/+2Yeah, what happens is that when the vote tallies start to contradict the exit polls, the press then "alters" the exit polls. Totally stupid, since exit polls show how the actual voters voted. In order to keep track you have to actually save the orignical data to your own computer. I did that - I saved the real, orignial exit poll, and later, on MSNBC, they changed it. So I saved that also, to compare. They do this so that voter fraud cannot be proven. Complicit panderers!
- natschultz, on 01/22/2008, -0/+1http://www.nolanchart.com/authors/articles/article ...
- Yeshuas, on 01/21/2008, -0/+1Website cannot display this page?
- jimboot, on 01/24/2008, -0/+1It gets worse, Watch "hacking democracy"
- inactive, on 01/20/2008, -3/+2hey for some reason that link is broken.... go figure here is the story
Digg This!!! Nevada Vote Fraud Proven!
Posted January 20th, 2008 by nathalja
How the GOP is Deliberately Controlling the 2008 Election Through Voter Fraud
http://digg.com/2008_us_e...
A chronological analysis of the election campaign from summer 2007 until now. How the GOP's plans for a Hillary vs. Rudy campaign were shot down and how they are deliberately engaging in voter fraud to reach their goals. A real-time mathematical analysis of the Nevada Caucus shows how votes suddenly disappeared.
I finally got this post through!
This absolutely PROVES Vote Fraud! I watched the numbers in real-time, and I SAVED the ORIGINAL exit polls to my computer. This shows, mathematically how Paul should have been the clear #2 @ 18% of the vote, but then all of a sudden the numbers changed.
I FOUND the MISSING NUMBERS!
You will not believe how absolutely blatant the GOP and all the media is!
Literally, EVERY OTHER Candidate GAINED votes, but Paul LOST his. Actually, at the end when I discovered all the "new, adjusted" exit polls that the media used to hide the truth, I didn't even calculate anymore because I couldn't stop crying.
But, I proved it from Washoe County alone - Paul lost exactly 16% of his votes, and the combined GAIN of the others was EXACTLY 16%.
The whole article traces the scheme from the beginning of the summer on. Then towards the end you can read my emotions - first elation because he was so winning! And then absolute despair.
The math PROVES the fraud!
Please Digg this so the WHOLE WORLD can see the TRUTH!!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/27648 - inactive, on 01/20/2008, -12/+5You don't add percentages...plus Paul came in second in the end....and also, there are often keying errors in these votes. It happens to all candidates, votes come up and go away, until the very end when it's confirmed.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is